- Time
- Post link
This guy is offering Puggo Grande as a bonus disc with the GOUT.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Star-Wars-Original-Trilogy-Purists-DVD-Pack-Theatrical-Releases-16mm-Transfer/253610803544
I reported him.
This guy is offering Puggo Grande as a bonus disc with the GOUT.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Star-Wars-Original-Trilogy-Purists-DVD-Pack-Theatrical-Releases-16mm-Transfer/253610803544
I reported him.
This guy is offering Puggo Grande as a bonus disc with the GOUT.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Star-Wars-Original-Trilogy-Purists-DVD-Pack-Theatrical-Releases-16mm-Transfer/253610803544I reported him.
You get a Wookiee cookie. 😃
Where were you in '77?
For the love of God don’t eat it
Are you implying something about my cooking?
Where were you in '77?
Nobody’s looking at SilverWook’s cooking.
You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)
THIS clown.
THIS clown.
I reported him.
I reported two more on ebay just now.
The question was never wether fan-edits were legal. They are not. So any way of distributing fan-edits, no matter if paid or for free, is technically a copyright infringement.
Technicality–making a fan edit is legal, distributing it without a license from the copyright holder is not.
Sadly, not if the blu-ray is used as a source. By removing the copy protection you have breached the DMCA.
Donations welcome: paypal.me/poit
bitcoin:13QDjXjt7w7BFiQc4Q7wpRGPtYKYchnm8x
Help get The Original Trilogy preserved!
From the Wikipedia DMCA page:
"Rulemaking was scheduled to occur in 2009, but the final rule was not issued until the following year. The 2010 exemptions, issued in July 2010, are:[39]
Motion pictures on DVDs that are lawfully made and acquired and that are protected by the Content Scrambling System when circumvention is accomplished solely in order to accomplish the incorporation of short portions of motion pictures into new works for the purpose of criticism or comment, and where the person engaging in circumvention believes and has reasonable grounds for believing that circumvention is necessary to fulfill the purpose of the use in the following instances:
Educational uses by college and university professors and by college and university film and media studies students;
Documentary filmmaking;
Obsolete software and video game formats.
Noncommercial videos. (A new exemption in 2010, similar to a previous educational exemption.)"
One could argue fan edits fall under "noncommercial video’ I suppose. Or if you’re a film studies student like myself, could argue it falls under educational use.
I’m glad of this news.
The question was never wether fan-edits were legal. They are not. So any way of distributing fan-edits, no matter if paid or for free, is technically a copyright infringement.
Technicality–making a fan edit is legal, distributing it without a license from the copyright holder is not.
Sadly, not if the blu-ray is used as a source. By removing the copy protection you have breached the DMCA.
I learned that recently making my TLJ fan edit. I think that’s complete trash. If I’ve purchased the official blu-ray, I should be able to do whatever I want with it as long as it’s for private use.
I know it’s not really an issue since it’s impossible to enforce, but I take exception on principle.
You can do what you want, the issue is distribution.
You can do what you want, the issue is distribution.
No, you cannot. Copyright grants exclusive right to create derivative works (works that adapt the original work), except in a fair use context.
I mean, you can do what you want in the privacy of your own home, you just cant distribute it. Free or otherwise.
Indeed, if we adapt a work privately without making it public, the author will never know that this adaptation exists. But Copyright, theoretically, does forbid adaptation of a work without the prior consent of its author, no matter whether it is distributed or not.
JEDIT: it was already discussed here: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1108834/action/topic#1108834:
Exclusive rights
There are six basic rights protected by copyright. The owner of copyright has the exclusive right to do and to authorize others to do the following:
- To reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords;
- To prepare derivative works based upon the work;
- To distribute copies or phonorecords of the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;
- To publicly perform the work, in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
- To publicly display the work, in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work.
- To digitally transmit sound recordings by means of digital audio transmission.
A violation of any of the exclusive rights of the copyright holder is a copyright infringement, unless fair use (or a similar affirmative defense) applies.
(…)
Making a fan-edit interferes with point 2 of “exclusive rights”, however, if you made this fan-edit for yourself and you watch it only with your family, you’d have a very strong case that this is covered by “fair use” as you’re not interfering with anyones business. (See point 4 of fair use.)
Just came across this: Link to website removed by moderator - let’s not give them the publicity they wish for.
Just came across this: Link to website removed by moderator - let’s not give them the publicity they wish for.
What the serious F.
Maybe the most brazen yet. It’s even got a “copyright” on the bottom.
"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars
Does godaddy have any way to report a website? I’m sure there’s a terms of service violation in there somewhere.
Where were you in '77?
Does godaddy have any way to report a website? I’m sure there’s a terms of service violation in there somewhere.
copyrightclaims@godaddy.com is their official address for copyright complaints, but I’m not sure how useful it is if you’re not the copyright holder’s lawyer.
Hopefully there’s something usable here: https://supportcenter.godaddy.com/AbuseReport
No matter how many times this guy has been reported, ebay is still allowing him to sell Revisited and other edits. Ebay is a joke. As long as they get their cut, they aren’t bothered
https://www.ebay.com/str/stinkytuna2000?_trksid=p2047675.l2563
I actually called Ebay but they just told me to make the report online. I wonder if you put your foot down enough you could get customer service to connect you with someone with a little more authority.
i dont mind the idea of, say chipping into a project and getting somthing in return, its what ive had in planning for my retso jobs, mostly as a thank you gift for donating towards the restoration, rather than explicitly selling it, but downright selling fan edits and claiming oh you gota pay that price, it cost me a whole 5 dollars to print a lable on a bluray disc, instead ill lie and say its handling, its a scummy as hell practice
Im that guy who likes megazone 23 a little too much
I actually called Ebay but they just told me to make the report online. I wonder if you put your foot down enough you could get customer service to connect you with someone with a little more authority.
dont even bother reporting, never works, ebay straing up ignores obvious counterfits, sure ive bought some, but ebay never did anything after reporting them
Im that guy who likes megazone 23 a little too much
I actually called Ebay but they just told me to make the report online. I wonder if you put your foot down enough you could get customer service to connect you with someone with a little more authority.
dont even bother reporting, never works, ebay straing up ignores obvious counterfits, sure ive bought some, but ebay never did anything after reporting them
Good to know.