logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 533

Author
Time

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

Man of Steel isn’t that bad. It’s not great, but it does have good aspects.

I’m surprised you liked BvS more than Justice League though. BvS was simply one of the worst films I’ve seen in recent memory. JL ain’t great either, but at least I didn’t want to kill myself while watching it.

It might have helped that I’ve only seen the director’s cut, I dunno. From what I’ve seen of the differences between that and the theatrical, I don’t understand how the theatrical was comprehensible in any way.

It wasn’t.

Personally, I can’t imagine how making an already interminable film longer would make me enjoy it any more, so I haven’t seen the director’s cut and can’t really compare.

Author
Time

Collipso said:

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

Man of Steel isn’t that bad. It’s not great, but it does have good aspects.

I’m surprised you liked BvS more than Justice League though. BvS was simply one of the worst films I’ve seen in recent memory. JL ain’t great either, but at least I didn’t want to kill myself while watching it.

It might have helped that I’ve only seen the director’s cut, I dunno. From what I’ve seen of the differences between that and the theatrical, I don’t understand how the theatrical was comprehensible in any way.

Is the director’s cut the “ultimate version”?

Yep.

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

Man of Steel isn’t that bad. It’s not great, but it does have good aspects.

I’m surprised you liked BvS more than Justice League though. BvS was simply one of the worst films I’ve seen in recent memory. JL ain’t great either, but at least I didn’t want to kill myself while watching it.

It might have helped that I’ve only seen the director’s cut, I dunno. From what I’ve seen of the differences between that and the theatrical, I don’t understand how the theatrical was comprehensible in any way.

It wasn’t.

Personally, I can’t imagine how making an already interminable film longer would make me enjoy it any more, so I haven’t seen the director’s cut and can’t really compare.

Well, from what I’ve read, the theatrical cut removed large chunks of plot, especially surrounding the Africa stuff, Lois’ investigation of Lex, and Clark’s investigation of Batman. So it’s longer, yes, but the short version seems to have sacrificed narrative coherence for a shorter runtime, crippling an already flawed film.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

Man of Steel isn’t that bad. It’s not great, but it does have good aspects.

I’m surprised you liked BvS more than Justice League though. BvS was simply one of the worst films I’ve seen in recent memory. JL ain’t great either, but at least I didn’t want to kill myself while watching it.

It might have helped that I’ve only seen the director’s cut, I dunno. From what I’ve seen of the differences between that and the theatrical, I don’t understand how the theatrical was comprehensible in any way.

It wasn’t.

Personally, I can’t imagine how making an already interminable film longer would make me enjoy it any more, so I haven’t seen the director’s cut and can’t really compare.

Well, from what I’ve read, the theatrical cut removed large chunks of plot, especially surrounding the Africa stuff, Lois’ investigation of Lex, and Clark’s investigation of Batman. So it’s longer, yes, but the short version seems to have sacrificed narrative coherence for a shorter runtime, crippling an already flawed film.

director’s cut is watchable. theatrical is absolute shit. i watched it 2 years ago (and i feel like i’m much more mature and i comprehend “things in general” a lot more now) and i couldn’t understand a thing. then there was the wonder woman mess. oh god…

nothing made sense. the prison section in the theatrical made no sense. 0 sense, i’m not even kidding. lois’ investigation was basically bs too, and i don’t even remember what africa part you’re talking about. i might rewatch the movie in a near future.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

ChainsawAsh said:

Tried watching Justice League tonight.

Tried. Holy shit is it bad.

And this is coming from someone who genuinely liked Man of Steel and didn’t think BvS was quite the abomination many saw it as (though it’s not exactly good).

I’m going to try to finish it someday, but I’ll need lots more booze first, if only to be able to see past the mustache removal (which isn’t even the worst of the CGI I’ve seen so far).

I thought that Justice League was better than I was expecting, though majorly flawed. WB want to hurry to catch up with Marvel, and they’re trying to do something fast that you just can’t rush.

The Magnificent Seven- It ain’t Sturges, and it sure as hell ain’t Kurosawa, but director Antione Fuqua’s remake/retelling/reimagining/whatever is a lots of fun as a straight action flick with some good performances from a a team of cool stars. It has little or the social depth of either of the previous versions and is light on character development, but has a couple of impressive action set pieces and some striking cinematography. Denzel Washington is a commanding screen presence, Chris Pratt has fun as his usual wisecracking hero, Ethan Hawke is terrific as a self-loathing PTSD-rattled soldier, and Vincent D’Onofrio has a blast chewing the scenery. Nothing like a masterpiece, but a solid, entertaining action movie-Western that has no delusions about what it is or wants to be. Lots of fun.

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.”

Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Collipso said:

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

ChainsawAsh said:

DominicCobb said:

Man of Steel isn’t that bad. It’s not great, but it does have good aspects.

I’m surprised you liked BvS more than Justice League though. BvS was simply one of the worst films I’ve seen in recent memory. JL ain’t great either, but at least I didn’t want to kill myself while watching it.

It might have helped that I’ve only seen the director’s cut, I dunno. From what I’ve seen of the differences between that and the theatrical, I don’t understand how the theatrical was comprehensible in any way.

It wasn’t.

Personally, I can’t imagine how making an already interminable film longer would make me enjoy it any more, so I haven’t seen the director’s cut and can’t really compare.

Well, from what I’ve read, the theatrical cut removed large chunks of plot, especially surrounding the Africa stuff, Lois’ investigation of Lex, and Clark’s investigation of Batman. So it’s longer, yes, but the short version seems to have sacrificed narrative coherence for a shorter runtime, crippling an already flawed film.

director’s cut is watchable. theatrical is absolute shit. i watched it 2 years ago (and i feel like i’m much more mature and i comprehend “things in general” a lot more now) and i couldn’t understand a thing. then there was the wonder woman mess. oh god…

nothing made sense. the prison section in the theatrical made no sense. 0 sense, i’m not even kidding. lois’ investigation was basically bs too, and i don’t even remember what africa part you’re talking about. i might rewatch the movie in a near future.

As I watched the theatrical cut I was amazed at how awful it was. I barely knew what was going on and everything felt just incomplete and scattered. The Ultimate cut though is actually a fine movie. Like no joke, the improvements feel huge. Everything is fleshed out and much more understandable. It still has an awful villain with no motivation, a poor portrayal of Superman (coming from a guy who liked Superman in MoS), and a overly complicated plot with an CGI crap fest at the end.

I usually just remember the Ultimate cut so don’t connect with much of the hate that I see, but just taking a look at the theatrical cut reminds me again of how just terribly awful that version is.

But I will say that the one thing BvS absolutely nailed (besides him killing people) was Batman. Purely glorious content there. I just wish we can still get a solo film with Matt Reeves directing and a studio that doesn’t boss him around.

EDIT: And this reminds that everyone should take a look at samspider’s edit of MoS that incorporates stuff from BvS. Shaping up to be one killer fan edit.

Return of the Jedi: Remastered

Lord of the Rings: The Darth Rush Definitives

Author
Time

Don’t think so. He also felt like a completely different character in JL. And not like he’d evolved from where we left him in BvS, either, which I’d have been fine with.

Author
Time

Collipso said:

did batman kill in JL?

Just against Parademons, which aren’t human.

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.”

Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death

Author
Time

Okay, I finished Justice League.

It wasn’t that horribly awful. The first half hour or so is, though.

It’s tonally inconsistent throughout, the CGI is some of the worst I’ve seen in recent memory, the story is basically nonexistent, and the painfully obvious reshoots go beyond Superman’s awful CGI face (which sadly encompasses 90% of his spoken dialogue).

But overall it’s a dumb superhero team-up movie and if it weren’t for Marvel doing it first and doing it much better both the first time and multiple times since, it would have been better received.

It’s bad, yes, but it’s not as bad as the first 30 minutes would have you believe.

Author
Time

When you look at just how bad some of the CGI is, it’s amazing to think that it cost $300 million.

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.”

Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death

Author
Time

“47 Metres Down” (2017)

Decades ago a certain man made a film about sharks which defines the genre to this day. So much so that it’s impossible to watch a shark movie without comparing it to that classic, flawless piece of filmmaking. That man was, of course, Renny Harlin and the film was Deep Blue Sea.

Putting aside all comparisons, this story of two sisters whose cage dive goes disastrously wrong and leaves them trapped at the bottom of a shark infested sea with limited, and rapidly decreasing, air actually works really well. It’s well played by Mandy Moore and “that one from the telly whose name I can’t remember right now”. A bearded Matthew Modine shows up for a bit and does his best with what he’s given.

The sharks are superbly rendered cg (not that I’d ever claim to be an expert on such things but they look very realistic!) and although they are of the Hollywood “HUMANS, I KILL YOU BECAUSE NOM NOM!” variety they aren’t overused and feel like a real threat.

Way better than I was expecting and a fun way to spend a Saturday night in a switch-off-yer-brain kind of way.

Whether or not you appreciate the story choices made in the last act will no doubt have a big impact of your opinion of the film because it’s, yeah, it’s a bit of a slap in the face. Personally, I liked how it went because I really wasn’t expecting things to turn out the way they did. A claustrophobic, tense and scary 80-odd minutes.

I give it 7.5 chum buckets out of 10.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The Cloverfield Paradox - I’ve never watched any of its predecessors, but this was fun-ish. I quite enjoy paradox and movies that deal with this sort of thing, with this supernatural aspect. And it was a cool movie in general, I didn’t hate it but didn’t love it. The worms scene alone makes me never want to watch this again though. Absolutely gross.

Author
Time

I consider it the worst of the three, which is to say you should watch the other two.

Author
Time

They’re all very different movies, so it sorta comes down to personal preference. The first is a monster movie, the others aren’t, for example.

Author
Time

10 Cloverfield Lane is fantastic.

Author
Time

Yeah, I’m not a huge fan of the first one, though it isn’t bad for a found footage style movie.

Lane would, in fact, have been better with a very different last 5-10 minutes, but that doesn’t completely invalidate the superb psychological thriller the rest of the movie is.

Author
Time

ChainsawAsh said:

Yeah, I’m not a huge fan of the first one, though it isn’t bad for a found footage style movie.

Yep

Lane would, in fact, have been better with a very different last 5-10 minutes, but that doesn’t completely invalidate the superb psychological thriller the rest of the movie is.

Yep

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I’m about to watch Alien for the first time and im not sure to start with the original Music Track or The Alternate Music Track. Which one would you Choose?

“Get over violence, madness and death? What else is there?”

Also known as Mr. Liquid Jungle.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

paja said:

I’m about to watch Alien for the first time and im not sure to start with the original Music Track or The Alternate Music Track. Which one would you Choose?

Original. Look what site you’re on.

Lane would, in fact, have been better with a very different last 5-10 minutes, but that doesn’t completely invalidate the superb psychological thriller the rest of the movie is.

Since we know that was added on at the last minute, I wonder what the original ending was and if it’ll ever see the light of day.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Handman said:

paja said:

I’m about to watch Alien for the first time and im not sure to start with the original Music Track or The Alternate Music Track. Which one would you Choose?

Original. Look what site you’re on.

Sorry. And Thanks?

“Get over violence, madness and death? What else is there?”

Also known as Mr. Liquid Jungle.