- Time
- Post link
Oh my.
This topic has been locked by a moderator.
DAMNIT FRINK.
Now I’m upset again!
Yo Frink, I’m really happy for you, Imma let you finish but AntcuFaalb had one of the best socks of all time. One of the best socks of all time!
Oh my.
DAMNIT FRINK.
Now I’m upset again!
Yo Frink, I’m really happy for you, Imma let you finish but AntcuFaalb had one of the best socks of all time. One of the best socks of all time!
Frink, don’t listen to him, he’s a jackass
😃
What is a wum? (see oojason’s latest post in the banned thread)
ah.
Flippin Groundhogs Day all over again, yet something is slightly difforento.
Oh carp I just posted in the insignificant tread.
Why was darth solo banned?
Flippin Groundhogs Day all over again, yet something is slightly difforento.
Oh carp I just posted in the insignificant tread.
Why was darth solo banned?
PM’d
He wasn’t banned because of a PM!
He wasn’t banned because of a PM!
Lol
Are PM’s the only way to find these things out now? Can’t it just be stated?
Are PM’s the only way to find these things out now? Can’t it just be stated?
Pmed
He claimed his daughter died in a terrorist attack (I think…it could have been a natural disaster, don’t recall specifically). The staff felt (rightly so IMO) that they had enough evidence that he was lying to ban him.
IIRC
It was a terrorist attack at a concert I believe.
Are PM’s the only way to find these things out now? Can’t it just be stated?
I don’t know, I figured this particular ban could be a bit of a sensitive subject.
It was a terrorist attack at a concert I believe.
In Manchester (UK) and the details of their “daughter” did not tally with the casualty reports.
“Logic is the battlefield of adulthood.”
He claimed his daughter died in a terrorist attack (I think…it could have been a natural disaster, don’t recall specifically). The staff felt (rightly so IMO) that they had enough evidence that he was lying to ban him.
I hope they were right. Would be horrible to loose your child and then be banned from a place you like because the Mods don’t believe you.
He claimed his daughter died in a terrorist attack (I think…it could have been a natural disaster, don’t recall specifically). The staff felt (rightly so IMO) that they had enough evidence that he was lying to ban him.
I hope they were right. Would be horrible to loose your child and then be banned from a place you like because the Mods don’t believe you.
Yeah but i think he was lying he did threaten mods that he would skin them alive.
He claimed his daughter died in a terrorist attack (I think…it could have been a natural disaster, don’t recall specifically). The staff felt (rightly so IMO) that they had enough evidence that he was lying to ban him.
I hope they were right. Would be horrible to loose your child and then be banned from a place you like because the Mods don’t believe you.
He admitted to it IIRC.
Real fun to have to see this dug up again. 😕
Where were you in '77?
He claimed his daughter died in a terrorist attack (I think…it could have been a natural disaster, don’t recall specifically). The staff felt (rightly so IMO) that they had enough evidence that he was lying to ban him.
I hope they were right. Would be horrible to loose your child and then be banned from a place you like because the Mods don’t believe you.
Yeah but i think he was lying he did threaten mods that he would skin them alive.
Woah…
Real fun to have to see this dug up again. 😕
It would be simple to just state why a user was banned when the hammer drops. I don’t see why that’s a problem. Maybe I’m not seeing the full picture.
He claimed his daughter died in a terrorist attack (I think…it could have been a natural disaster, don’t recall specifically). The staff felt (rightly so IMO) that they had enough evidence that he was lying to ban him.
I hope they were right. Would be horrible to loose your child and then be banned from a place you like because the Mods don’t believe you.
Yeah but i think he was lying he did threaten mods that he would skin them alive.
No. That was a separate incident in which Solo threatened to skin “you a!!” [sic] because we couldn’t understand what he was saying.
To the best of the forum’s knowledge, Solo was lying about his daughter. The list of victims did not match with what Solo described. This incident happened about two months after the “kin you a!!” [again, sic] incident. More discussion here.
Real fun to have to see this dug up again. 😕
It would be simple to just state why a user was banned when the hammer drops. I don’t see why that’s a problem. Maybe I’m not seeing the full picture.
Or if something of an explanation and whether it’s temporary or permanent could be added to the user page upon banning.