he-who-should-not-be-named in Ent. Weekly?

Author: ADigitalMan
Date: 16-Apr-2005, 3:26 AM

Author: ADigitalMan
Time: 16-Apr-2005 3:26 AM
Post link

A letter to the editor was published in entertainment weekly from somebody named Daniel A. Brown, from Leyden, Mass., talking about Lucas' plans for 3-D and reminding readers why the OT was legendary.

I wonder if it was our own dark lord who shall not be named.

I am fluent in over six million forms of procrastination.

Author: Klingon_Jedi
Time: 16-Apr-2005 12:00 PM
Post link

Hmm, that name doesn't ring a bell. The only person on here that should never be named if I recall had a screen name that started with a J and ended with an O, and I've already said too much and know it's not him.

Made for IE Forum's Episode III theme month - May 2005.

Author: Warbler
Time: 16-Apr-2005 1:36 PM
Post link

yeah, J____ would not say that the OT was legendary. He'd say that the PT, and Lucas were legendary, but not the OT.

Author: Moth3r
Time: 16-Apr-2005 1:42 PM
Post link

I think DanielB was Australian.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here