- Post
- #969895
- Topic
- Anime talk
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/969895/action/topic#969895
- Time
anime is bad
i say no
anime is bad
i say no
But you’re right, I should have said “no one who is a thinking person would ask this.”
Yes, they would. That is the definition of critical thought.
Sorry, I should have said “no one who understands film would ask this.”
Yes, they would. Have you ever seen a review of a film?
Have you ever heard an album?
Yes, I have.
I mean as an audio experience, not a visual one.
Yes, and I have enjoyed many audio experiences.
But none related to anime I’m sure.
I’m sure there’s some good anime soundtracks out there.
(P.S.: this discussion may have to continue a bit later in the afternoon)
But you’re right, I should have said “no one who is a thinking person would ask this.”
Yes, they would. That is the definition of critical thought.
Sorry, I should have said “no one who understands film would ask this.”
Yes, they would. Have you ever seen a review of a film?
Have you ever heard an album?
Yes, I have.
I mean as an audio experience, not a visual one.
Yes, and I have enjoyed many audio experiences.
But you’re right, I should have said “no one who is a thinking person would ask this.”
Yes, they would. That is the definition of critical thought.
Sorry, I should have said “no one who understands film would ask this.”
Yes, they would. Have you ever seen a review of a film?
Have you ever heard an album?
Yes, I have.
It’s nice to see people coming together over a game.
Even an objectively bad one?
Yes.
It’s nice to see people coming together over a game.
But you’re right, I should have said “no one who is a thinking person would ask this.”
Yes, they would. That is the definition of critical thought.
Sorry, I should have said “no one who understands film would ask this.”
Yes, they would. Have you ever seen a review of a film?
But you’re right, I should have said “no one who is a thinking person would ask this.”
Yes, they would. That is the definition of critical thought.
It’s not stupid.
But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.
I have no opinion about it - there’s no “why I think it’s objectively terrible.” That’s what makes it objectively terrible, rather than subjectively terrible.
Why are the prequels such objectively bad movies?
No one who saw them would ask this.
Yes, many have. It’s important to understand what’s wrong with something before just saying ‘it’s bad.’ Besides, it was a rhetorical question.
But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.
I have no opinion about it - there’s no “why I think it’s objectively terrible.” That’s what makes it objectively terrible, rather than subjectively terrible.
Why are the prequels such objectively bad movies?
But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.
I do understand what it means. I just think you don’t understand what it means.
Now I think you don’t know what “understand” means.
You have refused to answer my question. And, no, your half-answer doesn’t count.
I do understand what it means. I just think you don’t understand what it means.
So why is all anime so bad?
You’d have to ask the creators.
Anime is unacceptable.
WYSHS
This, too, is unacceptable.
I misread.
Well it’s still not fixed. I see you’ve edited your above post that only says, “I misread,” but your glaring negligence has been left to fester above that, even after the mistake has been shoved in your snout like shit on the living room rug.
Fix. It. Now.
No need to be so hasty.
Fixed.
So why is all anime so bad?
You’d have to ask the creators.
Unacceptable answer.
So why is all anime so bad?
C’mon, buddy. You mistyped it and ruined the joke. “Karate Framer” is nowhere near as funny as the accurate “Karate Farmer,” which is one of the loliest things ever.
You really need to be more careful. I mean, jeez, do I have to do everything???
I misread.
There is no dark side, no light side. The Force is the Force.
So you’re one of those hippie Force users. . . .
Hate is the path to the dark side.
This thread only had 11 replies before June of 2016.
George didn’t respond to the eye color question quick enough.
can i have invite to myspleen please?
Why hasn’t this sock-bitch been banned yet?
Form 51AB hasn’t been filled out yet.
In TESB the issue is different. The Falcon’s hyperdrive is out and they have to take the long way. That changes any trip from hours or days into weeks at the least. And that is just to get to a neighboring system. From a storytelling perspective, the time is irrelevant. It is enough time for you to believe that Luke and Leia are in love and that Yoda has trained Luke to be a quasi-Jedi (the way I look at it is that Yoda trained him in the skills he needed, but Luke hadn’t passed the tests to confirm he had learned the most important lessons - that he came back from confronting Vader proved he had taken in Yoda’s training). It really is however long you as the viewer thinks it needs to be to accomplish those two things. For me, that is about 2-3 months. The story skips to the arrival at Bespin and Luke’s vision so how long it took is never addressed. I think with Lucas’ idea that 3 years happen between ANH and TESB and 1 year between TESB and ROTJ that a longer time for the events in TESB fits better, but that is me.
Such a short timescale for training a Jedi would betray the prequels because Jedi training then is more like school. But that isn’t new.