This user has been banned.
ABC said:
You love so much when I violate the rules, I know it !!!
Perhaps you should undername the thread: "the forbidden to women thread"...
Women are allowed here...but only the right kind of women:
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/hot-like-C3PX-thread/post/260069/#TopicPost260069
And of course...
PURGATORY!!!
xhonzi said:
Man, did I almost make a big mistake.
QFT
ABC said:
Moth3r said:
OT question...
Last time I tried as uploader (quite a time from now), they allowed only ten download for it.
Uploading to a free collector's account should elimate that problem.
Guess what I just realized:
ABC said:
Though, he has the boots !
Suits, not boots.
PROBATION!!!
And to follow that trick up:
ABC said:
Anyway, this rhinestone subject is quite passioning... Awesome suits provided by Google !!!... Here a rhinestone bathing suit:
Thanks Ferris !
Rule #3, new Revision #2.
HALL OF SHAME!!!
(24 hour rule waived for repeat offenses)
ABC said:
Rather than say you don't know what to say, you could have post something related to the new subject !
Meh. Rule #7.
Waterworld.
No, seriously. I don't know why but I've always enjoyed it. I think it's the cool boat. Or maybe the foxy lady. Did I mention the boat?
This time was first time in blu, however. Very cool.
Slight alteration to the current thread topic:
RHINESTONE SUITS!!
Just to save me some fact checking, it doesn't have to be country singer specific.
C3PX said:
I'd probably end up being someone you don't get along with on the boards at all, even though your great friends in real life.
Even though I swore I'd never join him, I just found out that VINH is my father.
Noooooooooooooooo!
Wow. I don't know what to say.
Other than topic accepted, of course.
Honestly, Apple's sound check sucks.
The good thing about it is it's very easy to use, just turn on and off at the click of a button. The bad thing is it does a terrible job at normalizing, as far as I can hear. Much worse than MP3Gain.
ivolume looks interesting. I may take that for a test drive. Thanks.
Moth3r said:
Just read this - MP3Gain does actually modify the audio data, but in a clever way that makes it lossless/reversible.
Interesting. It sounds like there is a tech reason for the 1.5 db limit, so maybe this is as good as it can get.
Now here's where I get lost - AFAIK, the ipod (and itunes) do not support Replay Gain (they use a slightly different algorithm called Sound Check). So, in theory, you should not be hearing any difference in volume after using MP3Gain!
Well that is really strange.
I definitely hear a difference - all the songs are closer in volume. But even if my ears are playing tricks on me, the change in volume is being read (or processed or whatever) by both itunes and the ipod. Most songs come in in the high 90 db range, and i have the program set to reduce volume to 90 db. And the songs are definitely quieter after runnning the program.
Hmmm...well, it's not that big of a deal, as it does a decent job. I'm just looking for something that can tweak it a little more.
For a short while I thought someone at fandeditforum.com might be someone I worked with, based on his username. But before I had a chance to ask him, the guy on the forum revealed he lived in a different country.
Bingowings said:
Thanks to Google, I now know that "Buckfast" is a wine. And I just thought they misspelled "breakfast."
ABC said:
THIS THREAD IS NOW ABOUT TO CLOSE !!!
Sorry, but no.
THE THREAD IS STILL OPEN...
If someone doesn't pick a topic soon, I think Ric will pick one. And if I know Ric as well as I think I do, the topic will probably rhyme with "Nick Folly."
Thanks Moth3r.
Sorry, but I'm a novice with this kind of stuff. What do you mean by the metadata?
If you're asking if my ipod (or itunes) is playing the files at a volume based on MP3Gain's settings, then the answer is yes. There is a definite difference after I run MP3Gain, the tracks are much closer together in volume. But there is still a difference in some tracks, not bad by any means, but it seems like they could still be closer in volume.
Sorry to hear the bad news CA. Obviously this is no help now, but backup drives have gotten really cheap. Might want to look into one before you do anything else...
Nooooooo!
What is wrong with you people? This is not a serious discussion thread. You're supposed to be debating who is the better ACTOR.
I still say Lucas. He's a better blue Alien than any of the Na'vi.
Octorox said:
I never understood why the Clone Troopers were cg. They're supposed to be people...in costumes.
'Cause CG is AWESOME! So much better and more realistic than real life.
Bingowings said:
If you were a man you might not be ok with his "humour", if you were a woman you might find him hilarious.
Taste is subjective and follows no gender stereotype.
You are so hilariously wrong in this matter I am tempted to think you are pulling my leg about it.
You make it sound like you know this guy personally and that your certainty of his guilt is based on some kind of inside knowledge.
I feel safe in the assumption that no ex-wives, sons, cheerleaders or sex workers were killed in the making of these reviews.
Nor do I believe he harbors secret ambitions to take up mass murder either.
Sorry Bingo, but I don't buy it. Sure, a man might not be ok with the humor (as VINH and I are not), and yeah, some women might be ok with it. But you can't really think that a lot of women won't have a problem with rape and wife-killing jokes.
Rape and wife-killing are gender issues, because male-rape (i.e. the man is the victim) and husband-killing aren't anywhere near as common (at least as far as I can tell).
No one thinks this guy is guilty of these crimes. No one thinks he ok with doing these things. But he obviously thinks they are funny, at least in the context he's presented them. And I didn't agree.
I actually side with VINH on this one. You can play a character without being anti-woman. You can play a serial killer without making it about your wife. It could have been done a little more gently and it still would have made the point (and been funny). The few jokes he did like this are the reason I won't be showing it to my wife.
Still think the rest of it was great, however.
Deleted. Sorry.
Meh. Not much of an explanation, if you ask me.
However...
C3PX said:
Hehe, my Khan is longer than yours!
That was funny.
FULL PARDON!
However...
C3PX said:
.
PROBATION!!!
And finally...
THE THREAD IS NOW OPEN!
Very true.
However, there's so much crap in there that it's impossible to read through it all without wanting to off yourself. Stinky's posts are not only fun to read, but they're easy to find, what with the Dramatic Chipmunk and all.
ABC said:
Possible Klingons' ships make crop circles when landing... Any photo of that ?
My advice - just skip to the Stinky posts.
