logo Sign In

Editroid

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
3-Sep-2010
Last activity
20-Dec-2017
Posts
291

Post History

Post
#1069731
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

doubleofive said:

Editroid said:

doubleofive said:

Editroid said:

Please don’t judge me when I say that I hope the Revisited versions of the OT won’t contradict the official versions of the PT. Then again, since the OT is so sacred to many, most of the changes made to them are aesthetic, and not story-related.

Some of Adywan’s changes to RotJ may depend on what he can change in the PT. I’m still sure they’ll fit better than how much the PT already contradicts the OT.

Pardon me for seeming naive, but how does the PT contradict the OT?

Leia remembering her mother for one.

It’s “psychometry.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tnqFjTg5Zg

Post
#1069725
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Editroid said:

TV’s Frink said:

Editroid said:

Please don’t judge me when I say that I hope the Revisited versions of the OT won’t contradict the official versions of the PT.

OVERRULED

I’m only a Prequel Trilogy apologist. So what?

I’m judging you.

Okay, so I have a different opinion about them from you. You don’t have to be a jerk about it.

Post
#1069718
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

doubleofive said:

Editroid said:

Please don’t judge me when I say that I hope the Revisited versions of the OT won’t contradict the official versions of the PT. Then again, since the OT is so sacred to many, most of the changes made to them are aesthetic, and not story-related.

Some of Adywan’s changes to RotJ may depend on what he can change in the PT. I’m still sure they’ll fit better than how much the PT already contradicts the OT.

Pardon me for seeming naive, but how does the PT contradict the OT?

Post
#1069708
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Please don’t judge me when I say that I hope the Revisited versions of the OT won’t contradict the official versions of the PT. Then again, since the OT is so sacred to many, most of the changes made to them are aesthetic, and not story-related.

Post
#1048894
Topic
What is wrong with... <strong>Attack of the Clones</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yotsuya said:

And I completely forgot to mention that in my experience with online forums (going back more than 20 years) is that you always have people who disagree. You always have people who feel very strongly about things. But you can also have things happen that change the nature of the forum. Usually it involves an apparent gulf between new and old members and how the moderators handle it often dictates if the forum lives or dies (not literally, but in the sense of the forum being what it once was). So far I haven’t see that form of descent here and we have some top notch moderators. I think I would categorize fans by when the found Star Wars. Was it the originals in the theater? On home video? The Special Editions? The Prequels? Or now the Sequels? That is going to color a lot of their opinions and you really can’t change them. That is why I think acknowledging that everyone’s opinion (especially about Star Wars around here) is valid. Yes, this is originaltrilogy.com which should give anyone who comes here a clear indication of what this site is about, but someone can love the PT, even consider one or more of them their favorite of the Saga, and still want to see the original unaltered trilogy.

Feel free to love the PT all you want. But if you think they’re well made movies, you’re objectively wrong.

I’m sorry Frink, but you sound like a real dick when you say that. In one sentence you say that he’s allowed to have an opinion, but in the next you are saying that opinions are pointless. That’s hypocritical.