Sign In

Doctor M

User Group
Trusted Members
Join date
1-Feb-2005
Last activity
26-Feb-2017
Posts
2719

Post History

Post
#1046159
Topic
Raiders of the Lost Ark HDTV 35mm LPP regrade
Time

RayRogers said:

DrDre said:

RayRogers said:

Will this be a BD25 or BD50?

The current plan is to do the initial release as a 30-40 GB mkv, so a bluray version will be BD50.

Guess you’re using H264 and not H265 which is the vastly better codec including halving the filesize. I’d rather wait for the BD anyway.

Commercially perhaps, but the free x265 codec is immature and inefficient.
Hi10P x264 is superior but has low hardware compatibility which rules that out as useful too.

This post has been edited.

Post
#1036407
Topic
Disney's Beauty and the Beast [spoRv] *BD-25 RELEASED*
Time

I’m not sure how I feel about the added grain, ^…^. Overall, yeah, the new look is definitely superior.

I’ve always felt that once the grain is destroyed, adding fresh grain is just obscuring any detail left from over filtering or low resolution.

Could you post a new w/ grain plate vs. new w/o grain plate for comparison?

Post
#1031482
Topic
Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

bjwanlund said:

Okay, looked into it on Blu-Ray.com and the new Snow White Blu-Ray is basically the same master as the Diamond Edition. Which, given your recommendation of the Diamond Edition as an acceptable alternative DoctorM, seems like a “must-buy” for me. Been wanting Snow White back in my collection of Disney movies for awhile. Had the VHS (really it was a good restoration for its medium, dunno why they decided to continually monkey with it for future releases) and now I’ll probably have the Signature Collection Blu-Ray. Hopefully that stupid DMR-exclusive bonus feature is still there.

BJ

EDIT: Would have been nice had I enclosed a link. http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Snow-White-and-the-Seven-Dwarfs-Blu-ray/144704/#Review

Snow White is a problem because there really is no know original version outside of some film prints. Disney ‘restored’ this film early.

Post
#1014423
Topic
Best DVD-R brands today?
Time

It should be pointed out that bad/sub-optimal burns can reflect a burner drive that is starting to degrade.

If you can do a surface scan to check the quality of your burns, you should and then try burning on a different drive and comparing scans.

MyCE.com used to be called CDFreaks. The people there know their optical drives and media still.

This post has been edited.

Post
#1011369
Topic
DRESDEN FILES 2-HOUR PILOT PRESERVATION
Time

CharlieSummers2 said:

Nothing like resurrecting an almost ten-year-old thread…

Doctor M said:
Much of the workprint consists of missing effects, shots with big honkin’ text saying “Temporary Effect”, or “Insert Shot of Cell Phone In Snow”, blue screens, and overdubs from people that aren’t the actor (or the even the same gender).
<snip>

The 2-hour recut film version of Storm Front (aired in Canada) is available on various torrent sites. I’m wondering, though, if anyone ever posted a copy of the 67-minute workprint mentioned above? It’s that I would dearly love to watch, as-is and not re-constructed…

Check your PM

Post
#1005645
Topic
Good Hi-Fi VHS vs. 192kbps AC3?
Time

VHS Hi-fi audio is probably about 6-8 bit depth quality and that’s your limiting factor.
That said, if I was archiving, I’d encode to PCM audio, because the source is high quality analog and PCM is lossless. You would get everything you could out of it.

If space is a concern, you won’t be disappointed by 256-320kbps AC3.
I rarely would consider 192kbps for high quality digital sources.

This post has been edited.

Post
#1002960
Topic
VirtualDubMod MKV Problem
Time

I have no idea what alternative you should use either. But VDM requires that you index the video first and then load an avisynth script into it. It’s a real pain.

Post
#996356
Topic
Song Of The South
Time

Only Jim Crow, played by Cliff Edwards, was white. The rest were African American. Technically this means Disney was color blind when casting the crows.

It’s actually ironic that Jim Crow was white and in no way segregated from the other crows.

It’s only racist if you want to believe it was.

Post
#987925
Topic
m2ts to mkv
Time

towne32 is completely right. MKVToolNix isn’t capable of re-encoding video. The space savings is only because M2TS has more padding.

That said, it sounds like you have a raw M2TS file from a Blu-Ray. Why wouldn’t you use tsMuxerGUI to build it as a proper Blu-ray disc.

You’d have superior compatibility.

Edit: Oh, you don’t have a BD burner. You could use BD Rebuilder to re-encode it down to a BD9 (AVCHD) and burn it to a dual layer DVD.

This post has been edited.

Post
#986127
Topic
Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

FrankT said:

Oh? Under the same circumstances?

Not from the film being lost, but from the actor being in poor health.

From Wikipedia:
Little’s talent for impersonation has been used in movies, when an actor’s dialogue was impaired by poor health. When David Niven proved too ill for his voice to be used in his appearances in Trail of the Pink Panther (1982) and Curse of the Pink Panther (1983), Little provided the overdub in Niven’s voice. He performed similar duties to dub James Cagney’s stroke-impaired voice in the 1984 TV movie Terrible Joe Moran, and in the 1991 TV special Christmas at the Movies by providing an uncredited dub for actor/dancer Gene Kelly who had lost his voice.

Post
#982944
Topic
RELEASED: &quot;Star Trek: The Motion Picture (Special Longer Version)&quot;
Time

They can do any number of things transferring to PAL. The most common is 24fps master to 25fps with speedup to the audio track (and the pitch rises with it).

I’ve seen weird things like 24 to 29.97 to 25 or 24 to 25 with blended fields (which yields a blurry mess of interlaced material, but correct play speed and audio).

Post
#982939
Topic
Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

That’s exactly where the clip came from. All clips from the movie in “The Making of Peter Pan” in the 2002 DVD is footage from the 1990 transfer.

The colors and the light splotches on Tink’s dress are the give away.

It’s not uncommon for even new bonus features to use old transfers for clips rather than the restored version on the disc with it.

But yeah, as far as I know, there was no digital clean up until the Platinum Edition. I’m no expert though.

This post has been edited.

Post
#982111
Topic
Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

Spaced Ranger said:

Doctor M said:
They look more like a flaw than intentional effects.

Definitely agree.

I would rule out the standard procedure of washing and reusing animation cels (a cost saving measure) being involved in such an anomaly. If so, it would affect other colors. However, I don’t see it on the adjoining skin. More likely there was some other-color reside (or too much water) still on the brush or in the paint container to affect green painting across a group of cels.

Does anything show immediately before or after this shot, but nowhere else, for just this color?

I’m not sure I understand your question. I’ve never seen the 1990 release in its entirety so I don’t know if that splotchy appearance occurs anywhere else.

I still can’t help but think it has something to do with an optical effect used to create Tink’s glow… but the 2002 SE isn’t supposed to be a restoration, so you’d think if that were in the master it would still be visible.

Maybe it’s from the transfer itself?

Post
#981992
Topic
Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

More Peter Pan… I know, I know, but I came across some digital footage of the 1990 transfer.

Here is a slightly edited clip of Tinker Bell landing on the hand mirror. I used the three sources of most interest for comparison. The 1990 transfer that was used for the LD/VHS but from a DVD, the 2002 SE and of course the Diamond Edition BD.

https://youtu.be/RoWq8FDhMyQ

So now that I’ve seen those splotches on Tink’s dress in motion, I no longer believe they were intended to be pixie dust hand prints or something.

They look more like a flaw than intentional effects. Thoughts?

This post has been edited.

Post
#980525
Topic
Doctor M's ÜberGuide for -Full- PAL to NTSC DVD Conversion v2.0
Time

benduwan said:

is there a easier way to convert pal to ntsc or ntsc to pal?
i´m not so technical…
thanks

There are several all in one programs that will do the conversion, but results will vary, you probably won’t have the original menus and it takes a human to analyze the source to know the proper conversion method.

Post
#974468
Topic
Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

We do know that the Blu-rays are color timed based on the cells, not what the film or projector would cause it to look like. So we can rule those out.

When the Platinum Edition came out, most experts were appalled by the color changes. They are considered the most wrong.

The 1990 edition is thought to be the most correct by many.

If you want digital, the 2002 DVD is my second choice.

This post has been edited.

Post
#971707
Topic
Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features
Time

goofydylan8 said:

Ripped it again just to make sure I didn’t have the wrong version on my machine. Here are screenshots that look identical with a photo of my blu-ray. Peter Pan has only had one blu-ray release as far as I can find so it’s definitely the diamond edition.

Wow. You are right. I took a closer look, and there are some differences, but that’s disgustingly close to the Platinum Edition… except HD.

Edit: Okay, compiled everything you guys have linked, posted, etc. with my previous PP comparison sheet.

Here is an updated version showing everything up to the Diamond Edition: (see below)

Edit 2: I’ve been thinking about Disney’s trend in color changes and I’m starting to think this is the visual equivalent of Disney Enhanced Home Theater Mix soundtracks.

It’s just possible that the colors are intentionally wrong. The logic being that most people are using their TV’s default settings which tend to be over bright and with a cold color temperature.

It would explain the dingy whites, washing out of blues and a general tint towards gold.

That or Disney’s restoration people are dimwits that are using uncalibrated monitors.

Edit 3: Updated version giving proper credit for BD images: http://www.mediafire.com/download/xcbdcebef7r7z9d/Peter_Pan_v2.7.html

Btw, unfortunately all images are compressed jpg (with some being re-compressed). The software I was using was ill equipped for the job. It was this or a 25mb version which seemed ridiculous. The quality doesn’t seem to be perceptibly altered.

This post has been edited.

To the top