logo Sign In

Darth Cracker

User Group
Members
Join date
3-Aug-2006
Last activity
9-Apr-2021
Posts
107

Post History

Post
#433818
Topic
I will refuse to buy STAR WARS on bluray!
Time

I don't have a Blu-Ray player/HDTV. Was gonna invest if the OOT was coming out as part of the set.

So i guess now i won't bother. Thanks for saving me some dosh Mr Luca$*

 

[rant]

*By the way George, "It's a very, very expensive process to do it," is just a mystifying reason to omit the Original Originals from the set. You're a F***ING BILLIONAIRE, man! Get over yourself & give something back to the fans for Chrissakes! Your stubborn revisionism is a kind of mental illness, just as our love for the OOT is a kind of mental illness - but we are RIGHT and you are WRONG.

[/rant]

Post
#426712
Topic
Free "farewell" Screening of 1977 Star Wars collector's print (British I.B. Technicolor)
Time

danny_boy said:

"Another year later I saw both films back-to-back as a double-bill in a British cinema, not bothered by not being able to speak English, knowing both stories by heart."

http://twitchfilm.net/featured/2009/07/twitch-o-meter-the-ten-megaton-tom-twitch-o-meter-turns-10.000.000-part-2.php

 

Just found this poster...it was 1981:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
By s9b at 2010-07-23

http://www.icollector.com/Star-Wars-The-Empire-Strikes-Back-1981-double-bill-UK-Quad-Cinema-Poster-30-x-40-Linen-Backed-cond_i5245832

 

 

 

I had that poster!!! Wish i still had it... i remember seeing the double bill at my local Odeon cinema in Hanley Staffordshire and lip-synching with the dialogue :-)

 

Post
#426183
Topic
Free "farewell" Screening of 1977 Star Wars collector's print (British I.B. Technicolor)
Time

Just saw this on Facebook.

Friends of the Senator Theatre, present 2 free "farewell" screenings of a 1977 print of Star Wars today (Baltimore MD, 21 July 2010, 4:30 & 8pm)

Link:

http://friendsofthesenatortheatre.wordpress.com/2010/07/20/senator-theatre-free-farewell-to-kiefaber-screenings-of-rare-star-wars-1977-print-on-july-21/

Facebook event:

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=134446589929441

Can someone get down there and beg for the print to be professionally cleaned up, scanned and delivered to Luca$film for the BluRay release?.......... (yeah, dreaming)

Post
#411900
Topic
DVD Active's The Ten (things that SW Blu-Ray should include)
Time

Cool article, if you didn't see it already check it out here:

http://www.dvdactive.com/editorial/articles/the-ten-things-that-the-forthcoming-star-wars-blu-ray-should-include.html

YAY to the request for "good artwork", and the suggestion about a toys documentary is interesting too, but it is this section that's really singing my tune...

EVERY VERSION

With content and packaging out of the way let’s focus on the specifics. Each of the six episodes should be there in all their different versions right? This is Blu-ray after all. The format that has space to spare and with years of bitching about original and special editions, it’s about time Lucasfilm released the product we’re all wanted—the one that covers it all.

So, just to be clear: original theatrical versions, ’97 special editions and the DVD versions of the original trilogy (you know, the one with the slightly less gooey Jabba amongst other things). 

Moving onto the prequels, with the much talked about and indeed glimpsed at new scenes arriving in at least The Phantom Menace (including the much needed CGI Yoda), I’m hoping we don’t just get the new versions on the new format. Again, I’m after theatrical and then any changes in a separate selection. 
 
Oh and before you think we’ll forget. all in HD. You know how we all felt about the original versions of the original trilogy when they got thrown out on DVD, Lucasfilm. Don't let us down.

Amen to that!

Post
#315369
Topic
Lucas to sue Star Wars designer
Time
--------------

Lucas to sue Star Wars designer

By WENN world entertainment news - 33 minutes ago

Filmmaker George Lucas is suing a British designer who created the costumes for his Star Wars films.

Andrew Ainsworth designed the storm-trooper helmets and was paid GBP35 each for 50 helmets made for the 1977 film.

But he says he owns the merchandising rights and is entitled to a multi-million dollar pay off.

In 2004 he sold copies of the outfits for GBP1,800 each - but was stopped by Lucas who claims he owns the copyright.

But Ainsworth has hit back claiming the copyright has expired because the uniforms were industrial design, not art.

The U.S. court case is expected to last 10 days.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/wenn/20080407/ten-lucas-to-sue-star-wars-designer-c60bd6d.html

-----------------
heh - "industrial design not art" sounds more like a description of the PT/SE to me ;)
Post
#297822
Topic
"Lucas can't find home for Star Wars spin-off"
Time
Lucas can't find a home for Star Wars spin-off

By WENN world entertainment news - Tuesday, September 25 03:50 pm

Star Wars creator George Lucas is struggling to find a home for his spin-off animated series Clone Wars.

The movie mogul admits he's struggling to get a network to pick up the 100-episode series. He has already created 40 episodes.

He tells TV Guide magazine, "People are talking about it, but so far everybody's got the same conundrum: How do we programme it? It doesn't fall into the realm of what animation typically is, which is either adult, kind of off-colour humour or kiddie stuff.

"It has to go on after nine o'clock, and it can't be on a kiddie channel."

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/wenn/20070925/ten-lucas-can-t-find-a-home-for-star-war-c60bd6d.html
Post
#289529
Topic
30th Anniversary - Empire Magazine
Time
http://www.empireonline.com/features/starwars/

We've got two of your cast members here. Can you talk about the casting process?
George Lucas: When you're casting relative unknowns you just see thousands of people. You see them for five minutes and then you do readings, then you test them on tape, and then you test them on film, and you just do it over and over again for years - until you finally get to a point where you can throw a dart at a dartboard with three or four eight-by-tens and pick one. And you hope that you get lucky, and I got very lucky, 'cause I got a great cast.

Carrie Fisher: I slept with him

Mark Hamill: Who didn't?


LOL

Empire magazine produced 30 different covers for the anniversary (i picked up the Leia bikini one hehehe...) - with 10 copies of a limited "Golden Jar Jar Binks cover" in circulation. If you find of these you apparently win something special from the Luca$film archives..........................hopefully the original 35mm reels of the OT! (yeah, right)

EDIT - all 30 covers

http://www.empireonline.com/images/cover/large/217102.jpg
Post
#288504
Topic
I just can't watch Star Wars anymore....
Time
My wife & i watched the entire GOUT trilogy over the weekend ~ gotta say, we had a great time in that galaxy far, far away.

Needless to say, we had no desire to watch the prequels afterwards, not a fricken midichlorian in sight!!

The original trilogy just WORKS ~ beautiful, fun movies with tons of pathos and humour, made with passion and an innate drive to tell the story.
Post
#286437
Topic
Star Wars - The Exhibition, London
Time
Opened May 5th at County Hall, Westminster, London

Adult tickets cost £16:50!!! - that's a lot of ca$h for an exhibition...
Family tix (2 adults 2 children) = £50
Children = £12.50

it's supposedly running until Sept. but i personally won't be going unless they drop the price! (or bundle in a screening of the Original theatrical-release Star Wars )

official site
Post
#286436
Topic
BBC Radio 2 30th Anniversary documentary (1/2)
Time
Part one (of two) airs this Friday (19:00 UK time - live streaming online available)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/listings/day.shtml?day=friday#evening

19:00 Star Wars - 30th Anniversary

1/2. Thirty years ago, one of the most popular, profitable and entertaining sci-fi adventure fantasy films of all time was released. Since then, Star Wars has become the most influential movie franchise in cinema history.
Post
#283975
Topic
Revenge of the sith is the shite and the flies upon it
Time
Originally posted by: Wesyeed...except for it being so badly written.


That's the puppy right there - the root of all cinematic evil is bad writing.

Consider this gem:

Obi-Wan Kenobi: I have failed you, Anakin. I have failed you.
Anakin Skywalker: I should have known the Jedi were plotting to take over!
Obi-Wan Kenobi: Anakin, Chancellor Palpatine is evil!
Anakin Skywalker: From my point of view, the Jedi are evil!
Obi-Wan Kenobi: Well, then you are lost!


An unmitigated hairy bag of ass.

Post
#283007
Topic
What 30th Anniversary?
Time
Originally posted by: Fang Zei
Is George Lucas's ego really such that he can't even swallow his pride for one split-second and just remaster the things? It's the 30th anniversary and yet LFL is determined to sell everything except that which we want the most from them.


Sadly, the answer would appear to be yes - his ego really is such.

Post
#281588
Topic
Star Wars In 3D
Time
Article appeared today updating on the movie-studio-3D rumours:

More movies to be offered in 3-D
By GARY GENTILE, AP Business Writer Mon Apr 9, 1:50 PM ET
LOS ANGELES - By the end of the decade, Darth Vader could be rattling sabers with his enemies above the heads of moviegoers, and Buzz Lightyear could be flying off the screen on his way to infinity and beyond.

For real — or at least the cinematic version of real: 3-D.

A growing number of blockbuster, live-action films and animated movies are expected to be offered in in-your-face 3-D in the next few years, as thousands of theaters are outfitted with the special projectors and screens needed to show the films.

Jeffrey Katzenberg, chief executive of DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc., is so gung-ho about 3-D that he has said his studio might start exclusively releasing movies in the format as early as 2009 with its "Monsters vs. Aliens."

"For Memorial Day weekend 2009, I would like to see 3,800 locations and 6,000 screens that we can put our movie on. And if they are there, then we will be exclusive in 3-D," Katzenberg said at a recent investors conference.

So far, moviegoers have reacted positively to the few 3-D films that have been released in recent years.

"Meet the Robinsons" from The Walt Disney Co. debuted March 30, earning $25.1 million in its opening weekend.

More than a quarter of that revenue came from the 581 screens across the country that showed the film in 3-D, the company said. Those moviegoers were even willing to pay a few extra bucks to don special glasses and watch characters leave the screen.

A number of high-profile filmmakers have 3-D projects in the works, including Peter Jackson, Robert Zemeckis and James Cameron.

Walt Disney Co. has released 3-D versions of three animated films and recently signed a deal with Zemeckis to produce more. The studio is also rumored to be making the sequel "Toy Story 3" in 3-D, a report the studio declined to confirm.

These days, 3-D films are more than just a gimmick.

For theater owners and studios, the technology could be a lifesaver, luring people back to multiplexes for an experience that cannot be matched by sophisticated home-theater systems or stolen by pirates with hidden camcorders.

The theater industry is also battling competition from video games and other alternative entertainment along with Internet downloads that will soon deliver high-definition films directly to homes.

Film exhibition companies looking to protect their business believe 3-D will boost revenue. Some industry executives think theaters can add as much as 50 percent to the cost of a ticket for a 3-D feature.

"If we can sell 10 percent to 15 percent of our tickets annually at a higher price point, that's a real mover of the needle," Mike Campbell, chief executive of Regal Entertainment Group, the nation's largest theater chain, said at the investors conference.

About 700 theaters across the country are now outfitted with 3-D technology, with thousands of others moving to spend the $17,000 needed to install the equipment.

Moviemakers, meanwhile, estimate that making a movie in 3-D can add as much as $15 million to the cost.

Today's 3-D technology is far more advanced than that used in the 1950s, the heyday of gimmicky 3-D films.

Previous 3-D systems projected two images on the movie screen, one for each eye. That required the use of red and blue lenses or even glasses with mechanized shutters that opened and closed quickly to separate the images.

With newer systems, moviegoers still need to don special glasses but not the cheap cardboard variety with blue and red lenses.

Instead, special polarized lenses will separate the stereo images projected on specially coated screens.

RealD, a Beverly Hills company, is the leader in modern 3-D with systems that will be operating on about 1,000 screens by the end of the year.

Its technology uses a special movie screen painted with a silver oxide to direct more light back to the viewer instead of scattering wavelengths the way normal screens do.

The theaters also use digital projectors that show movies stored in bits on a computer hard disk rather than traditional film.

Dolby Laboratories Inc. recently unveiled plans to market its own 3-D technology that would work with existing movie screens.

"The momentum is gathering, and I think this is probably the most exciting thing from a filmmaking and filmgoing experience that has happened in my time in the business," Katzenberg said. "There's nothing more compelling than this."


I saw "Nightmare Before Christmas" in 3D too, so i doubt "Darth Vader could be rattling sabers with his enemies above the heads of moviegoers" but rather rattling sabers INSIDE the boundaries of the movie screen