logo Sign In

Why Frink Reserved the 42nd Anniversary "OOT Release?" Thread

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time

My guesses for the two reasons:

Reason #1: This is the easy one. Just the simple Hitchhiker’s Guide reference.

Reason #2: A slightly more abstruse Hitchhiker’s Guide reference. One very nice explanation for how 42 could actually be The Answer was that “To Be or Not To Be” is The Question, and could be written as “2B || !2B”, which in hexadecimal, means “43 or not 43”. The answer being 42 means that the answer to “To Be or Not To Be” is “Not To Be”. Which, very cleverly, also answers the thread title.

Nice job, Frink.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

And it only took three posts for the thread to be ruined. Well done.

Author
Time

Whatever happened to rules like “no one-word posts” / “no image only?” #s shouldn’t count as a way out of that rule. Frink gets a hell of a lot of slack. Bit of a cockroach aint’ he?

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

Huh. Really did not expect Frink being the one coming out of this exchange smelling like monkey pee. Others, sure, but not this one.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

bkev said:

Whatever happened to rules like “no one-word posts” / “no image only?” #s shouldn’t count as a way out of that rule. Frink gets a hell of a lot of slack. Bit of a cockroach aint’ he?

Jesus dude. It was perfectly on-topic. What ever happened to “no images of a monkey drinking its own piss?”

But nah, I guess using a couple of gifs to answer the OP was the real shitty thing in this thread, huh?

Author
Time

bkev said:

Whatever happened to rules like “no one-word posts” / “no image only?” #s shouldn’t count as a way out of that rule. Frink gets a hell of a lot of slack. Bit of a cockroach aint’ he?

lol yeah Frink’s images in response to the thread’s topic were so much worse than seeing some sweet monkey dick.

Are you joking?

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

That crossed the line. Id, consider yourself warned.

And the no image only posts rule is being skirted. That also has to stop.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

Author
Time

Careful, draw too much attention to the topic at hand and people might realize the topic was a little silly to begin with.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

Okay, you have a point, but the Scanners gif is really disturbing to those who don’t know what it’s from.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Believe it or not I might have just scrolled through the monkey dick because I don’t remember seeing it. I’m so used to all those (unfortunately popular) Harambe memes that if I wasn’t paying close enough attention I could easily write it off as that.

If that’s what was posted, then… yeah. No comparison between dumb .gifs and that. Whoops.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

It might have looked innocuous before it fully loaded as well.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

bkev said:

Believe it or not I might have just scrolled through the monkey dick because I don’t remember seeing it. I’m so used to all those (unfortunately popular) Harambe memes that if I wasn’t paying close enough attention I could easily write it off as that.

If that’s what was posted, then… yeah. No comparison between dumb .gifs and that. Whoops.

Don’t use people commemorating our Lord and Savior to justify your bs.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

Okay, you have a point, but the Scanners gif is really disturbing to those who don’t know what it’s from.

Understood.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

And it only took three posts for the thread to be ruined. Well done.

It was like that when I got here, I swear!

bkev said:

Whatever happened to rules like “no one-word posts” / “no image only?” #s shouldn’t count as a way out of that rule. Frink gets a hell of a lot of slack. Bit of a cockroach aint’ he?

This was the implicit yet unmistakable heart of my critique-by-gif.

CatBus said:

Huh. Really did not expect Frink being the one coming out of this exchange smelling like monkey pee. Others, sure, but not this one.

Lol, nice. Winner: Darth Id’s Comment of the Week Award.

TV’s Frink said:

It was perfectly on-topic.

Give me a break. A Frink-referential “topic,” that should never have been outside Off-Topic in the first place, let alone used as a pretext for breaking express guidelines.
In fact, I didn’t realize it was in the Star Wars subforum until after S’wook exacted his justified moderatorification.

TV’s Frink said:

What ever happened to “no images of a monkey drinking its own piss?”

Oh dish, musta missed that rule. My bad.

Tyrphanax said:

…sweet monkey dick.

Oh come on, that makes it sound a lot worse than it actually was. The “dick” isn’t even a salient feature. …It’s all about the drinking its own pee.

[Id. Note: for anyone curious, google “Pitchfork Jet review monkey gif”.]

CatBus said:

Careful, draw too much attention to the topic at hand and people might realize the topic was a little silly to begin with.

[/thread]

Author
Time

Are image only responces banned in the star wars pic threads too?

Author
Time

They’re fine there.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

That shouldn’t change anything.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

That shouldn’t change anything.

Reason #84 you won’t ever be asked to be a moderator!

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/985246

Rules are rules. How should this person get a temp ban for this and you don’t for a similar post because people like you or you’re a “pillar of the community‽”

Author
Time
 (Edited)

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

How am I skirting the rule? The images were direct answers to the OP.

That shouldn’t change anything.

Reason #84 you won’t ever be asked to be a moderator!

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/985246

Rules are rules. How should this person get a temp ban for this and you don’t for a similar post because people like you or you’re a “pillar of the community‽”

Well for one (if you’d actually read the rules or Frink’s quoting of them):

  1. No image-only posts unless the image has a direct bearing on the topic at hand and it adds value to the discussion.

Emphasis mine.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)