- Time
- Post link
I found this post very interesting. It happens to be just a bit later in the same thread...
Vaderisnothayden said:
C3PX said:
You have to admit, Wrath of Khan has a lot more substance to it than any of the TNG films.
I don't agree. Spock's sacrifice had depth, but otherwise Khan was a crap movie (ok, Saavik was good, but other than that). Overrated in the extreme. With the TOS movies, each movie is better than one before it, with 6 being the best. And yes I am saying 5 was the second best. It's not a great movie, but it's an improvement on the ones before. 6 is the only good TOS movie. The TNG movies have various levels of quality, but I think the last two were the best. Yes, that includes the much-maligned Nemesis. Insurrection had some emotional depth. Generations was a disappointment. First Contact was ok. I'm not bothered by Picard getting more action heroey. Seeing as the movies all happen after the tv series, maybe he changed in character after the end of the show. People do change. From what I'm hearing about RLM's comments on Trek movies, it doesn't sound like I'd agree with his trek reviews either. I still can't believe he said Qui Gon has no personality. Lack of perception.
I basically requoted the entire thing, but the underlined part is what I find so interesting.
This is nothing against VINH's opinion, but what I found interesting is I had never heard this before anywhere. A lot of people subscribe to the even Trek movies are the only good ones (until Nemesis, of course), so in general people like Kahn, Voyage Home, Undiscovered Country, and First Contact in some order. Some people like The Motion Picture, some people hated Voyage Home (raises hand), the order of favorites changes from person to person, but VINH's opinion is one I've never come across before.