This topic has been locked by a moderator.
What? I am allowed to welcome him back if I want to. I agree he broke the rules, but I am also glad he is back.
No, his ban wouldn’t have been lifted at all.
Ok. This isn’t the arguments thread.
It was a misunderstanding. I apologize.
Ok.
If it were your sock, you wouldn’t have been let back in.
I was not let back in until today. It was my second post back. Before that, one could have assumed either way.
Irrelevant to the point, but ok.
I understand why I was banned. I admit that I was wrong for doing it. I will not make that mistake again (both the doing of it and the posting about it).
I’m grateful, however, to the powers that be for granting an early reprieve compared to what Jason originally said my sentence was. Message received.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
Ok.
If it were your sock, you wouldn’t have been let back in.
I was not let back in until today. It was my second post back. Before that, one could have assumed either way.
Irrelevant to the point, but ok.
The point being what? This is a forum. People have conversations. One person can chime in about the same thing someone else already said. That’s how conversations often work.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
Hey if you enjoy making redundant comments and calling it conversation, ok.
I have to agree with Chyron here. If there were the even just slightest suspicion that I had created a sock(when I in reality I did not) while serving a temp, I would want to tell everyone I didn’t do it as soon as my ban were over.
He posted. Therefore he was unbanned. Therefore the sock was not his.
It’s not complicated.
But ok.
He posted. Therefore he was unbanned. Therefore the sock was not his.
It’s not complicated.
But ok.
I would still want to deny the claim, if it were me. The fact that he was unbanned just means Jay and mods couldn’t prove it was him.
He posted. Therefore he was unbanned. Therefore the sock was not his.
It’s not complicated.
But ok.
I would still want to deny the claim, if it were me.
Ok.
Hey if you enjoy making redundant comments and calling it conversation, ok.
Or you could stop talking about it, and the conversation would end.
I don’t know why you assert that redundancy does not occur in everyday conversation, nor why whether or not it does could be of any importance.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
He posted. Therefore he was unbanned. Therefore the sock was not his.
It’s not complicated.
But ok.
I would still want to deny the claim, if it were me. The fact that he was unbanned just means Jay and mods couldn’t prove it was him.
I imagine they could compare IP addresses.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
He posted. Therefore he was unbanned. Therefore the sock was not his.
It’s not complicated.
But ok.
I would still want to deny the claim, if it were me. The fact that he was unbanned just means Jay and mods couldn’t prove it was him.
I imagine they could compare IP addresses.
Ah so you agree with me then. I’m glad that’s settled and I accept your apology.
He posted. Therefore he was unbanned. Therefore the sock was not his.
It’s not complicated.
But ok.
I would still want to deny the claim, if it were me. The fact that he was unbanned just means Jay and mods couldn’t prove it was him.
I imagine they could compare IP addresses.
Ah so you agree with me then. I’m glad that’s settled and I accept your apology.
For what it’s worth, I am sorry for pirating your edit. Seriously won’t happen again.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
I would also like to make it clear that the Bereadeus sock was not me.
Good point. the next person who doesn’t clear their name is probably the culprit.
Good point. the next person who doesn’t clear their name is probably the culprit.
I would also like to make it clear that the Bereadeus sock was not me.
Good point. the next person who doesn’t clear their name is probably the culprit.
must . . . resist . . . temptation . . . to . . . sigh . . .
must . . . resist . . . temptation . . . to . . . sigh . . .
That’s a sigh. Sorry.
I would also like to make it clear that the Bereadeus sock was not me.
Good point. the next person who doesn’t clear their name is probably the culprit.
must . . . resist . . . temptation . . . to . . . sigh . . .
You failed. And, as usual, we don’t now what you’re sighing about.
must . . . resist . . . temptation . . . to . . . sigh . . .
That’s a sigh. Sorry.
no its not.
I would also like to make it clear that the Bereadeus sock was not me.
Good point. the next person who doesn’t clear their name is probably the culprit.
must . . . resist . . . temptation . . . to . . . sigh . . . without . . . explanation . . .
FTFY
I would also like to make it clear that the Bereadeus sock was not me.
Good point. the next person who doesn’t clear their name is probably the culprit.
must . . . resist . . . temptation . . . to . . . sigh . . .
You failed. And, as usual, we don’t now what you’re sighing about.
when I originally posted it, I thought it would appear directly below I what I was referring to. But Frink posted before I could. But now I have quoted what I was responding to.
and I again, I did not sigh.
must . . . resist . . . temptation . . . to . . . sigh . . .
That’s a sigh. Sorry.
no its not.
Interesting theory.
and I again, I did not sigh.
The effect is exactly the same, so whether you actually sighed or not is beside the point.
ok, I won’t even joke about it anymore. My God. This is becoming the no fun forum.