That’s nothing. The Blade Runner set has like 6 versions of the movie.
Five versions of Blade Runner have been publicly released on DVD, HD DVD and Blu-Ray
The US Theatrical Cut
The International Theatrical Cut
The Directors Cut
The Final Cut
The Work Print
I swear, the more popular the movie, the more likely it’ll be mistreated.
I’ve found this to be absolutely true.
That’s nothing. The Blade Runner set has like 6 versions of the movie.
Five versions of Blade Runner have been publicly released on DVD, HD DVD and Blu-Ray
The US Theatrical Cut
The International Theatrical Cut
The Directors Cut
The Final Cut
The Work Print
I knew it was something like that.
That’s nothing. The Blade Runner set has like 6 versions of the movie.
Five versions of Blade Runner have been publicly released on DVD, HD DVD and Blu-Ray
The US Theatrical Cut
The International Theatrical Cut
The Directors Cut
The Final Cut
The Work Print
Plus Version 6 - the deleted scenes that are so extensive they form an entire alternate cut of the film when put back-to-back.
“That Darth Vader, man. Sure does love eating Jedi.”
Disney better release the original versions, or else.
We have waited too fucking long.
Disney better release the original versions, or else.
Or else… what?
Now you’ve done it.
Disney better release the original versions, or else.
Or else… what?
Exactly.
And in the time of greatest despair, there shall come a savior, and he shall be known as the Son of the Suns.
If I may, it’s not like Disney doesn’t already have a really good reason to give us what we’ve been clamoring for.
Harmy’s version has become very well known over the last several years, and now we have 1080p transfers of actual prints (or is it just ANH?) thanks to Team Negative One.
I’m not sure what it’s going to take to convince Disney of the money they’re losing by not doing a professional remastering themselves and slapping a price tag on it.
Disney better release the original versions, or else.
Or else… what?
Exactly.
😉
Where were you in '77?
If I may, it’s not like Disney doesn’t already have a really good reason to give us what we’ve been clamoring for.
Harmy’s version has become very well known over the last several years, and now we have 1080p transfers of actual prints (or is it just ANH?) thanks to Team Negative One.
I’m not sure what it’s going to take to convince Disney of the money they’re losing by not doing a professional remastering themselves and slapping a price tag on it.
If its still up to Lucas, Disney needs to tell us. But, yeah Disney is loosing money on this. There will be more scans of prints cleaned up and remastered to get the original versions. Sites are writing articles on this every few months. Look at completed listings of the 2006 DVDs and VHS releases. They are often going for more than the blu-rays.
It seems like people are really embracing the new characters. In fact, the big question people ask me now about Star Wars is, “Are Finn and Poe gay lovers?” And really how the f*ck would I know? My second husband left me for a man, so my gaydar isn’t exactly what you’d call Death Star level quality. ----Carrie Fisher
A LOOOOOOOOTT more than the BDs in some cases.
A LOOOOOOOOTT more than the BDs in some cases.
…why?
The font used for “Trilogy” makes it worth every penny.
A LOOOOOOOOTT more than the BDs in some cases.
…why?
Lovelikewinter was saying how some of the VHS’ and DVD’s of the OUT are going for more than what the BDs cost. My post was showing how some actually go for a LOT more than what the BDs go for. The set in that link is going for $2K.
A LOOOOOOOOTT more than the BDs in some cases.
…why?
Lovelikewinter was saying how some of the VHS’ and DVD’s of the OUT are going for more than what the BDs cost. My post was showing how some actually go for a LOT more than what the BDs go for. The set in that link is going for $2K.
I think he means why would anyone pay $2000 for VHS.
Or frankly the GOUT for that matter. You can pick those up for $20 a pop at some used stores.
I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.
WTF?! 2K for the OUT on VHS? Well, it’s a lot cheaper than buying a sealed copy of Super Mario Bros 2 (USA) NES cart.
A LOOOOOOOOTT more than the BDs in some cases.
…why?
Lovelikewinter was saying how some of the VHS’ and DVD’s of the OUT are going for more than what the BDs cost. My post was showing how some actually go for a LOT more than what the BDs go for. The set in that link is going for $2K.
I think he means why would anyone pay $2000 for VHS.
Or frankly the GOUT for that matter. You can pick those up for $20 a pop at some used stores.
They don’t last long if they do get them in (at least around here). I saw the 1993 Laserdisc set at Halfprice Books for I think $80 and they were gone the next time I came in.
It seems like people are really embracing the new characters. In fact, the big question people ask me now about Star Wars is, “Are Finn and Poe gay lovers?” And really how the f*ck would I know? My second husband left me for a man, so my gaydar isn’t exactly what you’d call Death Star level quality. ----Carrie Fisher
This article is comical. What does it even mean that the effects won’t hold up in HD? Does the author realize that for its first few years, Star Wars was only available in better-than-HD quality? (I.e. Film)
I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.
This article is comical. What does it even mean that the effects won’t hold up in HD? Does the author realize that for its first few years, Star Wars was only available in better-than-HD quality? (I.e. Film)
Yeah, that article pissed me off.
A LOOOOOOOOTT more than the BDs in some cases.
…why?
That’s nothing compared to those who think the Diamond Edition Disney tapes are worth something: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Beauty-and-the-Beast-VHS-1992-Walt-Disneys-Black-Diamond-Classic-/182452425052?hash=item2a7b03115c:g:yUEAAOSwTuJYn95x
This article is comical. What does it even mean that the effects won’t hold up in HD? Does the author realize that for its first few years, Star Wars was only available in better-than-HD quality? (I.e. Film)
The ignorance of some people never fails to amaze me.
I still remember listening to an episode of Imperial Holonet Radio where one guy mentioned that the movie Fanboys was getting released on dvd but not blu-ray.
“Was it shot digitally? No? It was shot on film? Oh, well then it’s not HD anyway.”
“Was it shot digitally? No? It was shot on film? Oh, well then it’s not HD anyway.”
I mean, I guess that’s technically true. HD is a digital standard, not a film one. It is an ignorant statement, however.
This article is comical. What does it even mean that the effects won’t hold up in HD? Does the author realize that for its first few years, Star Wars was only available in better-than-HD quality? (I.e. Film)
Too many people seem to think HD didn’t exist at all prior to Blu-Ray.
A LOOOOOOOOTT more than the BDs in some cases.
…why?
That’s nothing compared to those who think the Diamond Edition Disney tapes are worth something: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Beauty-and-the-Beast-VHS-1992-Walt-Disneys-Black-Diamond-Classic-/182452425052?hash=item2a7b03115c:g:yUEAAOSwTuJYn95x
I think I have that VHS, and I’m pretty sure it’s in good condition; can I be a millionare now?