negative1
This user is offline.
here's some more results using solo 21's script for
upscaling to 720p...
princess leia:
=============================================
gout 8
-------

gout 8 crop
-------
gout 8 => simple resize 720p
-------
solo21 -> gout 8 upscaling 720p
-------
adywan -> gout 8 1080p->720p
-------
[no GOUT in HD?->gout stabilize ->color correction ->upscaling to HD ->GOUT IN HD !] <no i still don't like newsgroups, just not as badly!>
negative1
This user is offline.
here's some more results using solo 21's script for
upscaling to 720p...
darth vader:
=============================================
gout 9
-------

gout 9 crop
-------
gout 9 => simple resize 720p
-------
solo21 -> gout 9 upscaling 720p
-------
adywan -> gout 9 1080p->720p
-------
later
-1
[no GOUT in HD?->gout stabilize ->color correction ->upscaling to HD ->GOUT IN HD !] <no i still don't like newsgroups, just not as badly!>
Octorox
This user is offline.
Salarian ScientistThis thread makes me think that the best way to get an HD OT would be to use Adywan's color corrected SE and splice in elements from the stabilized/upscaled GOUT. Is Adywan's HD version significantly compressed?
negative1
This user is offline.
Octorox said:This thread makes me think that the best way to get an HD OT would be to use Adywan's color corrected SE and splice in elements from the stabilized/upscaled GOUT. Is Adywan's HD version significantly compressed?
i've thought about that too..
but there are so many differences in color/textures/effects... i'm not sure
how this would be accomplished, and if the differences would be too much..
any ideas?
later
-1
[no GOUT in HD?->gout stabilize ->color correction ->upscaling to HD ->GOUT IN HD !] <no i still don't like newsgroups, just not as badly!>
negative1
This user is offline.
solo21 , or oldschooljedi,
don't know if there any updates to this script..
(OSJ have you tried it yet?)..
anyways, i'm getting some interlacing effects when i use the
script, so i'll try adding some deinterlace filters..
later
-1
[no GOUT in HD?->gout stabilize ->color correction ->upscaling to HD ->GOUT IN HD !] <no i still don't like newsgroups, just not as badly!>
Mielr
This user is offline.
(Jedi Knight) Space program? WHAT space program?!Octorox said:This thread makes me think that the best way to get an HD OT would be to use Adywan's color corrected SE and splice in elements from the stabilized/upscaled GOUT.
I agree. I think there are a couple of those projects in the works.
negative1
This user is offline.
getting back to rescaling images..
there's a photoshop plugin with batch capability that looks impressive:
==================================================

http://www.alienskin.com/blowup/index.aspx
Image Quality: Blow Up® 2 is a Photoshop® plug-in that produces enlargements dramatically sharper than any other software, especially Photoshop! Blow Up uses an innovative algorithm that temporarily converts pixels to a vector representation which results in perfectly smooth, crisp edges. Simulated texture and film grain keep photos looking natural even in extreme enlargements. Blow Up can even clean up JPEG compression artifacts when a client insists on using a low quality source image from the Web.
Image Quality
Image quality is improved in many ways. Results are sharper, both during upsizing and downsizing. Noisy images are handled better. Research from our Exposure product was used to improve simulated grain. You now have control over simulated natural texture.
examples at:
http://www.alienskin.com/blowup/blowup_examples.aspx
check it out...
later
-1
[no GOUT in HD?->gout stabilize ->color correction ->upscaling to HD ->GOUT IN HD !] <no i still don't like newsgroups, just not as badly!>
solo21
This user is offline.
Padawan LearnerI've not touched this in a while, but I'll dig up some results for you all.
I was using this script for a prequel trilogy edit, so my original source was the PAL DVD (deleted scenes), upscaling to match the WookieeGroomer 1080p rips. It's working well for me, but obviously the original source has a lot less grain etc than any OT footage.
negative1
This user is offline.
solo21 said:I've not touched this in a while, but I'll dig up some results for you all.
I was using this script for a prequel trilogy edit, so my original source was the PAL DVD (deleted scenes), upscaling to match the WookieeGroomer 1080p rips. It's working well for me, but obviously the original source has a lot less grain etc than any OT footage.
awesome,
thanks for checking back, i've been having a lot of fun with your script..
yes, i've done some 1080p rescaling, but it takes a lot longer, and its
hard to show here......
if you have any other ideas (about interlace artifacts, improvements), please
let us know..
later
-1
[no GOUT in HD?->gout stabilize ->color correction ->upscaling to HD ->GOUT IN HD !] <no i still don't like newsgroups, just not as badly!>
DVD-BOY
This user is offline.
Padawan LearnerHi,
Sorry to turn this into a bit of an AVISynth Help Club, but I seem to get the following error with Solo21's script:
MVAnalyse does not have a named argument 'overlap'
I know it's going to be something obvious, but I can't get my head around which bit I need to debug here:
function MVDegrain2i(clip "source", int "overlap", int "dct", int "idx")
{
overlap=default(overlap,0) # overlap value (0 to 4 for blksize=8)
dct=default(dct,0) # use dct=1 for clip with light flicker
idx=default(idx,1) # use various idx for different sources in same script
fields=source.SeparateFields() # separate by fields
backward_vec2 = fields.MVAnalyse(isb = true, delta = 2, pel = 2, overlap=overlap, idx = idx,dct=dct)
forward_vec2 = fields.MVAnalyse(isb = false, delta = 2, pel = 2, overlap=overlap, idx = idx,dct=dct)
backward_vec4 = fields.MVAnalyse(isb = true, delta = 4, pel = 2, overlap=overlap, idx = idx,dct=dct)
forward_vec4 = fields.MVAnalyse(isb = false, delta = 4, pel = 2, overlap=overlap, idx = idx,dct=dct)
fields.MVDegrain2(backward_vec2,forward_vec2,backward_vec4,forward_vec4,thSAD=400,idx=idx)
Weave()
}
Can anyone help? What does it all mean Basil?
Moth3r
This user is offline.
Nyeah...It probably means you have an older version of MVTools. The latest is (as far as I know) v2.4.2 and can be found here.
Last night, I dreamt that I wrote The Lord of the Rings. I was Tolkien in my sleep.
DVD-BOY
This user is offline.
Padawan LearnerThanks Mother, I tried the new install (mvtools2.dll) and AVISynth then complains that it can't find the function MVAnalyse, which appears to be now MAnalyse (?) in which case the usage also seems to have changed.
For some reason I was using a really old version, and it looks like once I've upgraded to the last of the 1.x branch it might have fixed the problem.
And I've finally got it working and then I get an Assertion Error and AVISynth explodes...
Might give up on this one...
dark_jedi
This user is online.
Dark Jedi KnightDoes anyone know how to get this to work on a lossless avi file?
or does it have to be a .d2v file?
If you did not know I used gforce's script and made lossless avi's of the SW Trilogy,and now just for the hell of it I want to try and upconver the file and see how it looks,but I cannot get solo21's script to work.
I keep getting the error that MVAnalyse need yuy2 or yv12,well I put the convert command all over the place in the script and it just keeps telling me the same thing.
any idea's?
Thanks

Moth3r
This user is offline.
Nyeah...The MPEG-2 video from the GOUT DVD is YV12, and I'm pretty sure that the stabilization script does not change the colourspace. Therefore, your lossless AVI should also be YV12, unless you changed it to RGB by accident when you saved it.
You can easily find out with this script:
AviSource("C:\filename.avi")
Info()
Last night, I dreamt that I wrote The Lord of the Rings. I was Tolkien in my sleep.
Moth3r
This user is offline.
Nyeah...Just had a closer look at the script, and I have serious doubts about its suitability. Can anyone explain the logic behind using SeparateFields() and Weave() steps for a non-interlaced source?
Last night, I dreamt that I wrote The Lord of the Rings. I was Tolkien in my sleep.
mrbenja0618
This user is offline.
I'm having pretty great results with Video Enhancer. It was posted earlier. Once you figure out how to use, it's pretty powerful.
dark_jedi
This user is online.
Dark Jedi Knightmrbenja0618 said:I'm having pretty great results with Video Enhancer. It was posted earlier. Once you figure out how to use, it's pretty powerful.
I to like it,pretty cool stuff.
