logo Sign In

timdiggerm

User Group
Members
Join date
23-Jul-2010
Last activity
20-Jan-2026
Posts
3,468
Web Site
https://macrobinoculars.wordpress.com/

Post History

Post
#1674587
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

RM4747 said:

Tobar said:

RM4747 said:

Everyone here should just ignore you, child. Don’t you have homework to do?

I recommend taking another look at our Hard Rules, specifically number 2. You won’t be warned again.

Yawn. No shortage of VPNs and new accounts I can make lol

I feel like this should just result in a banning

Post
#1674262
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

That guy with no name said:

DarthSmaul said:

That guy with no name said:

DarthSmaul said:

I’ve always found it quite interesting how when the Fox logos were changed for the 97SE they kept their original themes, even on the soundtrack. ANH has always been the most obvious.

I know John Williams himself composed theme for all the films.

What? What themes?

The Fox logo theme music itself.

John Williams did not compose the music. That was composed by Alfred Newman. He did record a version but it wasn’t used in any of the Star Wars films. Instead they just used the original recording…

I thought they only used the original recording on SW77, but Williams’ recordings on ESB & ROTJ?

Post
#1673676
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

DarthSmaul said:

oojason said:

NEW SCREENSHOT COMPARISON & NEW VIDEO CLIP - FROM Star Wars

 

ALI…

 
UHD…

 
4K77…

 

a streamable video clip of the above scene (video only): https://streamable.com/w8ayqc

 
 



 
 

 
A Mini-Index for info on the ALI OOT Restoration Leaks…

An Introduction / Overview
Image Screenshots & Comparisons
Video & Audio Clips
Media Coverage & Content
FAQs
News & Updates

 

We’re getting closer to the goods. This makes me wonder though, if 4K77 was designed to be closer to the original colors then why does it look so off?

Even the official UHD release looks more accurate.

The definition of the “original colors” is famously a difficult problem, involving things like the color temperature of projector bulbs, how much film has faded, nostalgic ideas of what movies of certain eras “should” look like, etc etc.

That being said, this clip is so lacking in contrast (except for the subs) that I wonder if the final thing will look very different.

But it is a nice confirmation of the original subs

Post
#1673655
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

That guy with no name said:

Bingowings said:

The DOUT isn’t going to be in cinemas for a whole year. Nobody knows about home releases yet. I think waiting for that isn’t practical or desirable, especially as lots of work has already been done.

Why are we calling it DOUT again? There is no other version called “OUT”, why do we have to specify it’s Disney???

tbf, the new release is not actually unaltered, as they’re re-doing some of the foley

Post
#1673196
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

SonnyGFunk said:

SomethingStarWarsRelated said:

I’m curious, why are these in 720p? Surely they have found and scanned all of these at higher rez?

For some reason ALI is uploading all the deleted scene stuff at 720p instead of 4K like they do for the normal clips, no idea why though.

This is admittedly concerning

Post
#1671108
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

SonnyGFunk said:

camdudetenger2018 said:

i still can imagine if lucus arts and lucus films releases a undone pre special edition uncut unrated and uncensored super extended verison along with a 1997 special edition style uncut unrated and uncensored super extended verison for the 50th anniversary

Eh?

It’s just like the original except using the takes where Chewy is naked.

They’re going to digitally paint out the bandolier?

Post
#1669234
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

YAREL_RGP said:

adywan said:

I have tried posting this numerous times now and everywhere i’ve uploaded it, it has instantly been blocked. My only option was to upload it to google drive. I don’t know how long this will last due to the bandwidth restrictions , but it was my only option. You can view the preview or download the clip to see it in better quality ( which is what i would recommend )

If you want to prevent your video from being blocked due to copyright issues, add this to the YouTube description. (Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended)

I do not believe that the copyright bot cares what you write in the description. Fair Use and other US copyright law terms apply whether or not you put something in a video description. This is like the idea that posting a particular copy-pasted paragraph on Facebook somehow protects you from their data collection; it does nothing.

Post
#1668329
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

NeverarGreat said:

That guy with no name said:

the skies on Tatooine are blue because the skies on Tatooine (Tunisia) ARE blue… They’ve been desaturated on home media (especially in the UHD) but have always been and meant to be a deep and bright blue…

If they’ve been desaturated on home media, does that not imply that they’re meant to be desaturated?

Kind of a strange question for a forum partly dedicated to complaining about all the ways the colors have been wrong on home media releases of this movie.

Post
#1667800
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

After viewing it a few times, I think it is a real problem. I think it’s a “crossing the line” issue, as they say in filmmaking.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Specifically it’s between images 4 & 5 of this sequence. By having the sandcrawler on the left, the camera has completely swung around from where it was before, in a very jarring way. It’s made worse by then swinging back around to where we were before for the next shot, but it would be a problem even without that.

I think the reason it’s okay to then do it for image 7 is that Threepio’s presence in frame anchors the viewer somehow? Anyway, continuity issues are less important than the visual language of film.

Post
#1667595
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

digitalfreaknyc said:

JF_Sanderson said:

Why is sandstorm still b&w? Because they don’t want to (or can’t) track down uncut negative and conform it to dailies edit?

What do you mean, “still?” It’s in color on the Blu-ray.

Lest anyone forget, here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQwEcD17RvA