logo Sign In

twister111

User Group
Members
Join date
22-May-2005
Last activity
1-Oct-2015
Posts
2,383

Post History

Post
#791396
Topic
Going away? Post so here!
Time

TV's Frink said:

Warb responded to what I said, so I responded back...just as I'm doing now. It had nothing to do with what you think you know to be the truth.
You responded to what I had said first with complete unbelief. And you continue with your response below.

TV's Frink said:

Furthermore, responses like yours only prove my point. You are so convinced of your truth you don't even consider all the other people who are convinced of their truth, even though all these truths are contradictory in one way or another. Just for one example, you aren't going to find many Jewish people who subscribe to your version of the truth. Myself included.

RicOlie_2 said:

Have you not considered that you are equally certain that most of us are wrong about our religions, as you have made quite clear on several occasions? I bet you're also pretty sure that creationism is not how the world came about, and that matter is made up of atoms. Yet in neither case have you had an opportunity to experience those realities first-hand, and you must rely on the research, experience, and conclusions of others to form a decision on them.

EDIT: Apologies for engaging you in debate, but you started it. :P

With responses like these it's pretty clear that the satanic strong delusion is clogging your ears. It's partly my fault as God guilted me into knowing that I haven't explained just how important it is that you start seeking Jesus and walking a repentant walk. But I'm explaining it now. It is important and it's the most important thing you could do in your life. Refining your soul with repentance is so important you have absolutely no idea. Until you're ready to really listen to what I have to say I have no time for you.

Trying to analyze this like it's a science experiment is foolishness. Think about this all of you are willing to dig and scour the internet for years hanging off the interviews and words of George Lucas. Yet someone among you has got knowledge from God and your only inclinations are to say that I'm wrong and try to prove me wrong right off the bat. If you started today in a year or two God just might impart the kind of wisdom he has unto me unto you too. If you seek him with sincerity eventually you will get this satanic strong delusion lifted from you I just don't know how long it would take for you individually. I see now that this is why God chose me to come separate from here so that you might see how serious this is and want to know the truth. Contact me when you want to know the truth instead of just trying to disprove me. I sincerely hope you do.

AntcuFaalb said:

I'm not sure that we can come to any truth without the ability to verify our experiences with something other than another subjective experience.

With that being said, I do wish you the best of luck. I hope you find happiness and meaning in whatever walk of life you choose.
The truth is available for anyone to find out. It's free all you have to do is seek it with sincerity and repentance. I wasn't called out by any human being to find this out. God chose me to find this out and you can heed to this calling by someone chosen by God or not. Really even if we never speak again you can learn the truth behind everything I'm talking about just by seeking Jesus and God. Beyond this little nudge in the right direction you can get all the direction you need from God. I'm just offering my help by offering contact information.

Also I do appreciate the well wishes but I'd hope that at least one of you would've wanted my e-mail address instead. Because none of you realize the satanic warfare going on right now everywhere. I'd rather help you fight it than get well wishes thinking I'm going on a long vacation or something.

I pray in Jesus name that the satanic strong delusion is lifted off of at least one of you. Amen.


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#791329
Topic
Going away? Post so here!
Time

TV's Frink said:

One thing I have always found unfortunate about religion is the way most everyone believes their version of "the truth" is the correct version.
What's unfortunate is that you'd rather rebuke what I have to say in an impersonal manner than address me directly and ask me why I feel like I know the truth now. Don't you find it odd that after all this time that we've interacted on these forums the moment I proclaim Jesus Christ with authority you instantly close your ears and use truth in quotations as though it'd be impossible for me to know it? Do you not question your own quickness to dismiss what I have said? You'd rather ask Warbler who isn't proclaiming with such authority that I am. Though it's not about being special in any certain way. Anyone here could come to the same truth I have if they would only seek Jesus and the most high God on their own with sincerity. Praying's free and it takes very little time of your day to do so. I can pray that you see that there is truth in my words and actions but I can't do the actual act of praying for you. God gave you the free will to choose to pray or not. It's up to you to seek the truth for yourself I can't do it for you.

I will say this, it'd be nice to hang out here for when the next Star Wars movie releases. It'd be nice to discuss the story points, see the fan edits, and the eventual animated gifs for it. I just can't stay here while I know that God doesn't want me wasting my time here.

Warbler said:

true, but most Jewish people don't believe Jesus is the son God. They believe the Messiah hasn't yet come.

Warbler said:

true. But I would wager that many Jewish people that believe Jesus is the son of God would convert to Christianity. (I am not saying you should convert nor am I saying you shouldn't convert)

Well then obviously I'm not like most Jewish people.

Anyways I'll be checking here probably until 7am or 10am tomorrow at the latest. Primarily to give my e-mail address to those that want it. I may post again I may not. But if I don't this'll be my last post here until I do enough for Jesus and Adonai that I feel like I can check in again.

Goodbye everyone and if you'd like to talk again you have two ways to contact me.


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#791266
Topic
Going away? Post so here!
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

 But I thought you were Jewish?

But good for you. Hopefully we'll see you around in the not too distant future.
I am. Jesus doesn't stop being the son of Adonai the most high God just because I'm Jewish. And I don't stop being Jewish just because I know that Jesus is the son of Adonai the most high God. Petty human arguing about whether or not Jesus is the messiah or if he and his father in heaven even exist are irrelevant to the truth.

----------------------------------------------

In essence I'll probably be away from here at least 6 months if not then maybe even a year. Depends on how things turn out. Again you can keep in contact with me via twitter or if you want my e-mail just say so, so that I can PM it to you.


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#791231
Topic
Ask the member of the Latin Rite of the Roman Catholic Church AKA Interrogate the Catholic ;)
Time

You know what nevermind. Regardless of whether or not I'm right on this certain issue it really doesn't matter. I was temporarily puffed up with pride and arrogance and I apologize and repent of my behaviour. RicOlie_2 you don't need to make any reply to that post whatsoever.

Have a nice day everyone. http://i.imgur.com/UK732.gif Take care in the coming days ahead.

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#791230
Topic
Going away? Post so here!
Time

Danfun128 said:

Why are you leaving?

A few reasons, primarily because I want to read more Torah/Bible and think about ways to serve Jesus. I'm just getting more serious about improving my life in general and for right now spending time on this forum has to be put away. I may return someday I don't know at the moment.

Post Praetorian said:

Have a good trip(?) our twisty friend...;-)
Thanks!

If anyone wants to keep in contact with me I'll be available via twitter @thetwist111 or leave a message here that you want my e-mail address and I'll pm it to you.

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#791121
Topic
Ask the member of the Latin Rite of the Roman Catholic Church AKA Interrogate the Catholic ;)
Time

Warbler said:


I read it as "If you'd like to explain how x its a biblical reason to exclude women from representing Jesus feel free to thanks. " (x being the the quote from RicOlie_2).  I am not a grammar expert, but I think you should either say "how x is" or "how it" or "how that's".   Also I think you need a comma between Jesus and feel.   
()_o I'm not gonna George Lucas my post into SE version 50 over minor grammar issues that have already been clarified. It's a waste of time.


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#791117
Topic
Ask the member of the Latin Rite of the Roman Catholic Church AKA Interrogate the Catholic ;)
Time

Warbler said:


"it's a biblical reason to exclude women from representing Jesus feel free to thanks."

maybe should edit this so it makes sense?
??? ()_o It's a continuation of the sentence from above the quote. "If you'd like to explain how it's a biblical reason to exclude women from representing Jesus feel free to thanks." The "it" being the quote. Pretty straightforward.... Maybe using the up arrow "^" or the word "that's" might make it more clear but seems a bit useless to edit it now that I've explained it.


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#791096
Topic
Ask the member of the Latin Rite of the Roman Catholic Church AKA Interrogate the Catholic ;)
Time


RicOlie_2 said:One reason women can't be priests is that priests act in the person of Christ. This includes representing Christ himself, in the sacrifice of the Mass, in confession, etc. God is masculine in nature, especially in the form of Jesus. Priests representing him must therefore be male in order to properly stand in for him.

RicOlie_2 said:It's tough for me to explain, without spending hours and hours on it. But it is readily apparent that God made men and women differently, and not just physically. It isn't just our bodies that are different, but our souls as well.
It's arguably blasphemy to state this you realize this right? It states clearly in Galatians that
22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.

24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.

25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.

27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


Course you could talk about the scripture in Timothy and Corinthians about the male authority over a woman and how she shouldn't teach. However it's clearly in reference to a married woman each time. In the hebrew text it even uses the words for husband and wife in Timothy it's just that those words can also mean woman and man. But in each instance it makes much more sense for it to mean a married woman since it talks of her husband in Corinthians and in Timothy it states that she can be saved from having taken authority by bearing children. Which would only make sense if she were already married otherwise it's the bible sanctioning children out of wedlock which is actually blasphemy. Further the spiritual order of having a man as a woman's "head" only makes sense if she is married. Additionally the chapter in Corinthians is mainly talking about the unknown tongues. In context it's arguable it's just saying that women shouldn't teach on unknown tongues.

(Edit) Also it's arguable that it's just her husband that she shouldn't usurp authority over/teach not all men. As in each instance in Corinthians and Timothy it mentions her husband for whom she should turn to. (Edit)

Additionally:

RicOlie_2 said: Or, a person might want to become a priest to escape the responsibilities of family life or life in the "real world," which is also a faulty motive.

The command to "come out of the world" is biblical tho. If priests are to represent Jesus Christ it's blasphemy that they don't come out of the world. The only reason they shouldn't is to retain a job that pays money to support their family should they have one.
From John:
15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.

16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.
From Corinthians:
14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?

15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.

18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.


Seems to me that the whole "priest" position is built on a blasphemous foundation only intended to make men feel special and using Jesus as an excuse. Ultimately you could say that married women can't become priests because they'd be spiritually subservient to their husbands and Jesus is in authority over all men. However there's no reason I see that a single woman couldn't fulfill a priest position should she fulfill the other needed requirements. Though it's a position that seems held up by blasphemy anyways so it's really silly to exclude women on the blasphemous basis that a woman couldn't represent Jesus.

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

If you'd like to explain how

RicOlie_2 said:2. Because men tend to have a harder time connecting with their Faith, it helps to have an important and special role for them that doesn't make them feel that religion is for women. This sounds silly when summed up like this, but it comes down to the way men and women differ.

it's a biblical reason to exclude women from representing Jesus feel free to thanks.

Tho I will say that it's odd to have a position in the church specifically so that men don't feel like religion is for women.... It's like stating that this religion isn't for women at all so go away.

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#790793
Topic
All Things Star Trek
Time

pittrek said:


I found something interesting on the Star Trek Renegades website ( http://startrekrenegades.com/home/be-a-renegade-support-the-ongoing-internet-tv-series/ )



For reasons we are not able to disclose, CBS cannot move forward with Star Trek Renegades at this time – or any Star Trek series for that matter.
I always thought CBS owns the rights to Star Trek TV shows and Paramount owns the rights to Star Trek movies. Any ideas what can be the reason why CBS can't do any Star Trek series?
It can mean anything. From CBS just not wanting to do any Star Trek series but they're cool with them making the fan series so they're putting it in the nicest way possible. To there is some legitimate contract reasons for why they can't make a Star Trek series at this time. Possibly that it stipulates that while there's a running movie canon they're forbidden from making a TV series and vice versa. As a possible way of avoiding either production from trying to "take command" over the other and make story demands to keep either within it's own canon. If that's the case then obviously making that public would be unwise as people would be like "I don't care about the movies just make a series" or "OMG this series sucks! Why don't you cancel it to make more movies!?"


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#790497
Topic
Would you want to see Anakin or Obi Wan in the new trilogy, portrayed by their PT actors?
Time

Akton said:

Lord Haseo said:

I wouldn't mind seeing Hayden in the ST. All he would need is the right acting coach to get him in the good frame of mind for his scenes and secondly he needs good dialogue. People seem to forget only amazing actors give vastly greater performances than the actual writing allows. I mean even Samuel L. Jackson wasn't good in the PT and he's an overall great actor.

I hear these kinds of defenses of Hayden Christensen a lot around here. And I just don't get them.

I've seen Shattered Glass, the film purported to be the ne plus ultra of his thespian skills,and I can honestly say I don't think he ever rose above the level of mere competence and serviceability; about as good as your average Lou Diamond Phillips performance. Nothing approaching Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction, that's for damn sure. 

I dunno, praising an actor for simply being capable of turning in a not-horrible performance seems silly, and kind of smacks of the mentality that gives kids trophies just for showing up to the ballpark and gives congratulatory back-slaps to those Maury Pauvich and Jerry Springer guests who proudly proclaim their ability to pay their own bills.


Concerning Shattered Glass if you watch an interview with the actual Stephen Glass you can see how eerily close Hayden gets to a proper portrayal of him. That said, having had a lot of time without watching any of the prequels/anything with Hayden Christensen (apart from a few mins of stuff here and there) and revisiting some interviews with him in it today I don't think he was actually doing a lot of acting in Shattered Glass. Apart from Hayden being more happy and more confident there's not much separating Stephen Glass' personality from Hayden Christensen's.


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#789360
Topic
The Place to Go for Emotional Support
Time

Possessed, it's obvious that you need to work on the inside of you first. Maybe take some time off work and really discover what can make you happy. There had to have been a time in your life when you were just so excited to wake up tomorrow that you almost couldn't sleep you were so happy. Rediscover moments like that. Relearn how to think like that again. You talked about how others are giving you praise and respect at work already and that hasn't stopped you from trying to destroy your body. External praise, or even talking about the problem, or "fear" of how bad trying to kill yourself felt is only going to keep you alive on a temporary basis. You need to stop going for the quick fixes here. They have a shelf life and won't last.

Try to think of one thing to do tomorrow that excites you. Something easy that you can do in a few minutes when you wake up. Like reading a few pages of a book on something you're really interested in. Or checking this site, make that something you do when you wake up a few mins checking this site. Or set aside a YT video to watch when you wake up. Go to bed thinking of what interesting or exciting thing you can do tomorrow and wake up doing something that interests or excites you and you have something to hold onto forever. So long as you're alive there's a tomorrow waiting for you and something interesting to do when you wake up. You just have to start thinking about what you're going to do now. There are so many possibilities you just have to open your eyes to see them.

You have many days ahead of you man. Think of ways to enjoy each one.

(Edit) Okay even if you can't get time off work to reflect on this. You can still do this. Just think of it during breaks or something.


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#789250
Topic
All Things Star Trek
Time


Tobar said:


'Star Trek: Voyager' actress accused of indecent exposure, Tennessee TV station reports

A former actress in the "Star Trek" franchise was arrested this month in Tennessee, accused of indecent exposure in the presence of a neighbor's minor children, Knoxville TV station WATE reports.



The Roane County Sheriff's Office website confirmed that Jennifer Lien, who played the alien medical assistant Kes for the first three seasons of "Star Trek: Voyager," was booked with indecent exposure on Sept. 3. The bond for Lien, who lives in Harriman, Tenn., was set at $2,500, the records show.



According to the report, Lien left her front door open and was naked under a blanket on her couch when sheriff's deputies arrived with a warrant for her arrest, alleging an earlier incident of indecent exposure to a neighbor's children outside her home. The report said Lien refused to get dressed or walk to the patrol car, and had to be carried by deputies.


<a href="]http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2015/09/star_trek_voyager_actress_accu.html">Source</a>[/url]


This is the video embedded when you go to read the full story.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EASb1XYOtE

I think this one would've been better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBxzYVnW62I

Or this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRcWDxQfU5A

Also brings new meaning to this line:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISET6vrs-VM

That said, I feel sorry for her husband(if they're still married) and kid that they have to deal with her going crazy like this.

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#784070
Topic
Movies that were updated, then the original was &quot;lost&quot;(other than Star Wars)
Time

SilverWook said:

twister111 said:

Not a movie but a season of a TV series. Power Rangers Time Force was reedited in response to 9/11 to lessen the shots of exploding buildings and the after effects of the exploding buildings. Complete with an episode eventually being temporarily banned from airing, even tho it was reedited too, because of how it depicted the building destruction in the episode.

So when Disney bought Power Rangers they apparently threw out the original masters of the unreedited versions. Leaving only poor VHS quality backups of the originals that weren't suitable for a home release. So when Saban bought back Power Rangers he was left unable to release the originals due to Disney throwing them out.

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif
 Wouldn't most, if not all the exploding buildings be in the original Japanese footage though?
Most of it yes, however there's also footage that was reedited from the effects of the buildings getting destroyed. Like debris falling around people that are running away from the destruction that was reedited too. It'd take a restoration effort to try to return the footage to the original and it's a 40 episode season. Considering spending money to make Time Force in the first place caused Saban to loose enough money that he had to sell the entirety of Power Rangers I don't think he's that eager to spend even more money on a restoration effort of it.

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#783975
Topic
Movies that were updated, then the original was &quot;lost&quot;(other than Star Wars)
Time

Not a movie but a season of a TV series. Power Rangers Time Force was reedited in response to 9/11 to lessen the shots of exploding buildings and the after effects of the exploding buildings. Complete with an episode eventually being temporarily banned from airing, even tho it was reedited too, because of how it depicted the building destruction in the episode.

So when Disney bought Power Rangers they apparently threw out the original masters of the unreedited versions. Leaving only poor VHS quality backups of the originals that weren't suitable for a home release. So when Saban bought back Power Rangers he was left unable to release the originals due to Disney throwing them out.

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#783919
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

The new steelbook release covers seem to have no real logic or thought behind them other than "lets put some evil characters on the covers but shove Yoda on one of them". A neat way to have done it would've been to have the following:

Maul - Obvious reasons
Jango Fett - Because it's Attack of the Clones, his genetic code is the start of the clones.
Dooku - He may not have much of a role in this one but it is Revenge of the Sith and it makes more sense to have a Sith on the cover.
Luke - Because it's A New Hope. Having this one stand out with the lone non-bad guy character makes more sense.
Vader - I don't think this needs explaining.
Emperor or Yoda - Emperor to fit in with the overall theme, or Yoda to fit in with the whole "Return of the Jedi" feeling.

Alternatively keep it the same up to A New Hope and put Tarkin on a New Hope because Vader already has the slipcase cover. The Emperor on Empire then Luke on Return of the Jedi to fit in with the whole temptation towards the dark side angle.

I don't know some kind of logic other than just throwing the bad guys on the cover just to be cool and throwing Yoda on a random one.

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#783518
Topic
Oldest OT.com Thread
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

RicOlie_2 said:

The oldest threads are archived on the Wayback Machine (partially)--they're not on this version of the forum.
I wonder why ... *shiftyeyes* 
I forget which thread I saw this in but I seem to recall a post by Jay that explained it. Something about how the older threads were archived somewhere and could be reintegrated into the site sometime in the future. There was some technical reason behind it that I don't recall now for why the older posts were merely archived.


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#782620
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:



Warbler said:


DuracellEnergizer said:


Warbler said:


DuracellEnergizer said:


Warbler said:

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   COLE HAMELS JUST THREW A NO-HITTER!!!!!!!!!!

AGAINST THE CUBS! : D


Have you been assimilated into team_negative1? 


 no I haven't, what makes you ask?


Oh,

nothing.

*whistles* 


 ?

I don't get it.


Instead of making your statement,

in one, whole, continuous sentence,

you chose to break it down

into separate sentences -- like this --

which brought to mind

negative1's way of formatting

his sentences/paragraphs. 
Didn't negative1 have the reasoning

that his posting style was because of how the text displayed in the text

area box? So anytime the line would reach the end of the text area box

he'd create new lines so that he'd know exactly where the text would be

in his completed post? Something more akin to this. So in effect Warbler's

post would need to read like the following:

"YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! COLE HAMELS JUST THREW A

NO-HITTER!!!!!!!!!!


AGAINST THE CUBS! : D"

-Warbler

Because the "NO-HITTER!!!!!!!!!!" portion takes it to a new line in

the text area box.

-twister

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Post
#780514
Topic
Random Pictures and Gifs (now with winning!) [NSFW]
Time

http://i.imgur.com/FyXJkUf.gif

ray_afraid said:

DuracellEnergizer said:
twister111 said:

http://i.imgur.com/Q3u1qdo.gif


http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif

Must ... know ... source. 

<a href="http://kikaider.wikia.com/wiki/Devilish_Woman%3F%3F_Pink_Armadillo"> Here's</a> the show and episode info.
&<a href="http://kikaider.wikia.com/wiki/Pink_Armadillo"> Here's</a> character info.
*tries to time travel to give the thanks before the "you're welcome" *

Thanks for posting the source info ray!

>_>

http://i.imgur.com/MXA8TmO.gif