New Classic Who Blu-ray trailer:
New Classic Who Blu-ray trailer:
So has moderation on this site officially thrown in the towel?
This whole time I thought it really was supposed to be Untilted. I just assumed it was a term I wasn’t familiar with, but was too lazy to look up.
On the bright side, it probably is technically untilted. Unkilted too.
A native 4K encode of the version the Blu-Ray is authored from exists, actually. Guess it just hasn’t made its way around to the more public haunts just yet.
I may be mixing things up, but does that have the reel change markers still in place, unlike the iso?
Well, that’ll be my next option I suppose. Disc 3 (just the film itself with no fluff this time) is in process as we speak. Fingers crossed!
Hooray! Dunno what was causing problems with the intro videos, and while it would’ve been cool to have those, I’m just glad I don’t have a third coaster. Looks like I’ll just keep it simple in the future when muxing iso files.
If you weren’t doing so already, I would try multiAVCHD next time for multiple clips. But it’s possible one wasn’t compliant (multi should tell you and give the option of reencoding, though).
I don’t recommend any form of stick-on/adhesive label. They ruined most of the discs I used them on over time, and I’ve heard horror stories of them ruining disc drives as well.
If you want disc labels, the only truly safe way to do it is to get printable discs and use a compatible printer, unfortunately.
I was after a certain indie band’s very rare home-made CD-R release from the late 90s and every existent copy is now unrippable thanks to the adhesive used in the printed disc labels. Luckily I found someone who had ripped the CD back in the day and still had the files.
It’s worse for CDs because it actually peels the data off. DVDs and Blu-rys should be recoverable in theory.
screams in the void said:
fair enough , would the moderators object to me starting a thread about this topic so as not to further derail this thread ? also , my apologies to the op .I have not heard any thing regarding this issue from him . maybe he is on vacation ? and I am open to topic name suggestions
The OP has a new baby (or one on the way)! So the exact opposite of a vacation. 😛
I can’t imagine the mods would object to a new topic, though.
This looks really nice. Great work!
I enjoyed the season as well. It wasn’t bogged down by a bunch of UNIVERSE ENDING nonsense. But the views here are not unique, everywhere I’ve gone I’ve seen nothing but negative reviews of the season.
I did like the variety of relatively small to moderate scale threats. That’s an aspect Kerblam did well with, as did Demons and several others.
6 planets isn’t a terrible scale for the finale, but it’s too bad it was awful in nearly every other way. 😃 Still, as I said, the non Chibnall episodes were generally quite good.
Good points, Jason. People that might not want any diversity in the cast/crew might find it too liberal or PC, but so what? If anything, the content itself was far more centrist than ever before in the new series. It’s possible that Chibnall’s clunky exposition and frankly rather poor dialogue made things stand out a bit more, for people that are sensitive to certain things.
It also had perhaps the most conservative leaning episode since the Tom Baker serial, Sunmakers, with Kablam.
I myself found it a fairly disappointing season, mostly, that did a few things quite right. Chibnall’s own episodes felt of an amateurish quality, and the season planning (and what was done with the main characters) quite poor. But all of the guest writer scripts were well written, and a couple of them were great (Demons, Takes You Away, nearly Rosa with the faults likely Chibnall’s doing).
I hope things get tightened up next time. The presentation has taken a nice turn. Good direction, quality CGI, and I do like the new composer. Great actors, but each episode felt like they were still starting out and hadn’t developed the characters. I would love to see the role of show runner be more like a classic series producer, where they don’t write a single word of the scripts. 😉
Can’t wait for this one! The images look much better than Power.
You mention the 16mm has great color. Do you suppose you will utilize one of Dre’s color matching algorithms to match the 35mm print to the 16mm color?
Also, you’ve got a donation from me 😃
That could certainly be done, yes… but do you really prefer the 16mm colors as a reference?
I was under the impression that our 35mm sources were in much worse condition than they are. I really like the 16mm colors, but the 35mm looks good enough. I just grew wistful remembering an instance where color matching tools were used to reobtain original color from high quality black and white footage and a very low quality NTSC videotape.
It’s not “color matching” that’s being done here but rather frame blending. You take the b/w luma channel of the film footage and take the chroma channel of the video footage and overlap the two to recreate the color footage.
And in this case, it worked well because of a particular type of noise that allowed them to unwarp the 16mm source and overlay things more easily.
Presumably it’s not always an easy task to align two film scans.
How long do you think it might take due to how good the prints are? 4K83 had an amazing print so how good or bad is Empire?
Unlike the pristine Return of the Jedi print which needed very little work, this project is expected to take at least two years - many of the sources are faded, and have at least as much damage (perhaps even more) as the Star Wars prints we were working with.
‘Doctor Who to skip Christmas Day for first time in 13 years’…
The festive edition of Doctor Who will be shown on New Year’s Day on BBC One instead of Christmas Day for the first time since the drama’s return in 2005.
Not really a fan of this change. From what I’ve read, this is the kind of situation where, once the give up that time slot, they’re possibly never going to be able to get it back. And, when this rumor was going around a few weeks ago,
the reason stated was that Chibnall thought all of the Christmas plot ideas were tapped out. Which is… strange. It doesn’t need to be about Christmas to be broadcast on that day. And several of them have only had a passing reference to the holiday.
This would also explain, perhaps, why Chibnall initially refused to take over for the last Christmas special. Moffat stuck around to produce yet an extra Christmas special, specifically to make sure Doctor Who kept that time slot. Oh well, thanks anyway?
Have there been tests done with the Fuji scan to see just how far the colors can be pushed (at least approximately in the right directions)? I’m sure you’re choosing the best sources you’ve got, of course. Seems like something that you might have checked out before the restoration folks spend their many hundreds of hours on cleanup (thank you for your service).
I think he mentioned it in one of his workflow videos. 🤷🏻♂️😉
Without any kind of actual source to look at here, I’m just going by memory. The inclusion of GOUT in Jedi 2.5 was minor and more of a little homage, as all of the other 2.x releases had GOUT (in other cases, because it was needed, for Jedi just for fun).
This is in contrast to 3.0, which can totally break free of GOUT dependence. What would be the reason for including one GOUT shot for each film, in this case? I’m pretty sure you’re mistaken on this, but I’d be curious to see if he did in fact say that. 😃
Fang Zei said:
It was mentioned upthread that Despecialized 3.0 will be “entirely 35mm based.”
Does this mean 3.0 will finally be the “best of both worlds” version? In other words, the unaltered 70-80% of the bd color-corrected, with the 35mm scans used for the stuff that was altered, and none of Harmy’s meticulous recreations nor using the ‘97 re-comp shots in place of the true originals?
I think he said all that and he will only be using one shot of GOUT.
Jedi 2.5 had a piece of a shot from the GOUT, but I don’t know that there is a plan for 3.0 to do that. I would guess not.
I’ve really enjoyed the last couple of episodes. I’d dare to say that nuWho has finally reached Big Finish’s level of quality.
Looking forward to next Sunday’s. Another historical that looks rather good. And four weeks in a row with non-Chibnall writers (and first time writers for the show) sounds good to me.
It’s actually easiest to put it on an external drive and plug it directly into the 4K TV and play it that way. It won’t work on a PS4 (overly restrictive requirements for 4K media, such as it has to be h264, which the 4K releases from TN1 are h265), and I dunno about an Xbox.
On Xbox One you can definitely play it via Kodi. Not sure about the native apps, but I expect not.
Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:
I still dislike the color palette - or lack thereof. All that orange is driving me crazy. The lack of natural color, especially whites and blues (and actual greens and reds) makes everything look small and scrunched. Hard for me to imagine how multiple people can look at this and not immediately see that the colors are worse than on the 1970s episodes on VHS. There is no discernible reason for this, because most of the other modern-era Who episodes had great, rich color.
I don’t mind the strong color choices at all when depicting something like an alien world. Episodes 3 and 4 were differently colored and more natural (but we’re on OT, which is probably the most touchy site in the world when it comes to color, so I can’t say you’ll like it for sure! 😃 ). The preview for next week was almost all blue and white sets, though! 😉
I still have no idea what the Tardis looks like, but I’m assuming that will become more clear in the next episode. Well, other than that it is almost entirely orange (like the rest of the show).
It’s a strange design that looks like they don’t have enough space to film the whole cast near the console. I wonder if it will be tweaked for next series.
Dek Rollins said:
The most I know is that both the DEED and the 4Ks both use a technicolour print.
That’s only for Star Wars.
And also not true for Despecialized (though that may change).
Was there gate weave in the 35mm used for SW and ESB? I don’t remember there being any if there was.
He can correct me if I’m wrong, but much of what Harmy used for SW (and I think this is largely true for ESB) was from 35mm sources for lots of composite shots, but not large raw chunks of the film. Sources for the full films became more available and of higher quality as time went on. Harmy did blu-ray/35mm composites for Jedi as well, but he also had shots and scenes that were purely 35mm that time around. So the hybrid nature of that one was more obvious between shots, while the earlier projects had more hybridization ‘seams’ within shots, if that makes sense.
For SW 2.7, the film sources were surely stabilized so some degree by TN1. And I stabilized and otherwise tinkered things to try to get them to fit in with the blu-ray, as needed.
So 4k83 is here.
Which edition wins the all round, one-copy-only, best ROTJ at the moment?
Harmy 2.5 or 4k83?
Personal preference, really. Despecialized contains virtually zero GOUT. It’s basically all blu-ray and 35mm.
4K83 is extremely clean. I’ve seen commercial blu-rays and TV airings of movies with more scratches or dirt. The image is a little softer, and there are clearly limitations that are inherent to the reel-by-reel grading method. I think once someone does a shot-by-shot version of 4K83 (and as a personal preference, removes the reel change markers), it will be pretty damn hard to beat that. I think some shots look better in 4K83, because they’re purely from the original source. For instance, the early shot of 3PO and R2 at the door.
Two fantastic options.
TV’s Frink said:
Looks like I need to calibrate my babel fish.
You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about.