logo Sign In

lovelikewinter

User Group
Members
Join date
5-May-2014
Last activity
12-Oct-2018
Posts
602

Post History

Post
#941303
Topic
OT Special Editions to have USA Roadshow Summer '16
Time

The Star Wars Trilogy has held the top three spots for films I want to see in a theater (others in that illustrious group include the 2010 restoration of Metropolis, Blade Runner, Aliens, Superman the Movie) At this point I would even go see the 1997 SE, because all the real stupid shit didn’t go down until the 2004 release, that was the first time the theatricals and the SEs weren’t on an even playing field quality wise.

If they do release the OOT, how about a punching bag with Lucas’ face on it in the lobby so each fan can thank him as they go see the suppressed classics he tried to bury in favor of the mediocre meddlings of middle age?

Post
#937215
Topic
PrequelTrilogy.com - A new forum for a new era . . .
Time

There are like 8 people on that forum and the last post was 2 months ago. Safe spaces are for the weak. The river devil eats those who are weak.

I really don’t like invite only forums. Yes we have idiot spammers but they are fun and quickly dealt with. Besides, we should be accepting to all the new fans TFA brought and those who left because of the PT era.

Post
#935869
Topic
"Lucasfilm currently has no plans to release the original versions of Star Wars"
Time

I refuse to buy the Blu-Ray “Complete Saga” and give money to Lucasfilm for treating me like shit. I would buy the Theatrical Trilogy first day like I did with The Force Awakens. I would love Harmy’s versions burned onto discs, but I will not compromise on my stance and throw away money on something I despise.

Post
#934757
Topic
If George Had Made The Sequel Trilogy...
Time

Separating Luke and Leia was a hard thing to do. Padme would understand they stood a better chance apart. Life is full of shitty decisions that you make. Luke was loved by Owen and Beru, he had his own speeder and a skyhopper and he didn’t starve.

This all came about because Lucas wanted to tie up the “other” storyline and the Han/Luke/Leia triangle very neatly. Which makes no sense, because the other was captured by Vader when Luke went to save her.

Post
#934664
Topic
"Lucasfilm currently has no plans to release the original versions of Star Wars"
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

lovelikewinter said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Why would Disney and Fox executives be willing to discuss Legacy with Verta if they had no intention of ever releasing the non-SE versions of the films because of Lucas?

Where was this? I’m not saying it isn’t true, but I’d love to see where Verta said this.

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/910108

Thanks! That’s good news that execs are even willing to consider it.

Post
#933116
Topic
"Lucasfilm currently has no plans to release the original versions of Star Wars"
Time

suspiciouscoffee said:

I wouldn’t say sadistic, just childish and selfish.

Yep. His comments about TFA just show how childish he could be. Then Jett came on Twitter and basically attacked people for liking the movie and saying that we were the reason Lucas never made all those awesome movies he was going to make.

Post
#932973
Topic
Dear Lucasfilm: A Billboard
Time

I find it a shock that people believed the EU was going to be kept intact or considered when they announced the Sequel Trilogy and the Anthology films. Like JJ was going to follow hundreds of books and comics and not use Chewie. Everyone freaking loves Chewbacca, even the British Royalty forwent custom and hugged the crap out of him.

I loved the Daley Han Solo books, Shadows of the Empire, X-Wing and the Thrawn Trilogy. I enjoyed playing Rogue Squadron, and Jedi Knight. But I would give it all up again, because I got a 4th good Star Wars movie and several more promising ones on the way. The books were going up their own ass anyway.

Post
#932435
Topic
Is it really about historical novelty?
Time

In my experience, the PT fans love the SE, because they shoehorn PT elements into the classic films and are part of Lucas’ “Artistic Vision” or whatever they use to justify stupid shit like R2’s rock and Obi-Wan’s new call.

As for why the OOT hasn’t been released, I have a couple ideas. Keep in mind until Kennedy says anything on the matter, its still speculation.

  1. Fox doesn’t want to. Fox and Disney are in a pissing contest over Fantastic Four and I’ve heard Fox is still kissing Lucas butt.
  2. The restoration is taking a long time and they won’t announce it until its nearly complete. The negatives are in horrible condition and its possible they have to go to interpositives and other sources to create an acceptable OOT.
  3. It doesn’t fit into their plans right now. There is no secret that their primary goal was setting up the new Trilogy. Now that TFA is a huge success and Star Wars is a movie powerhouse again, they can devote resources to other things. 2017 sounds like a good time. You have Rogue One in December 2016, the 40th Anniversary in May and Episode 8 in December '17. It would be great synergy to have the OOT in mid 2017 on home video and limited theater showings.
Post
#928182
Topic
Star Wars: Rogue One - * Non Spoiler Discussion Thread *
Time

Topo said:

Spencer wilding could possibly play Vader In RO

Neither are confirmed, but it is interesting to think about!

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2016-04-12/is-this-doctor-who-star-set-to-play-darth-vader-in-rogue-one-a-star-wars-story

He looks to have some experience in wearing bulky costumes. As long as James Earl Jones is doing the voice- thats the important thing.

Post
#927861
Topic
Filmmaker and New Yorker film critic Richard Brody's thoughts on the prequels.
Time

joefavs said:

It is so painfully obvious that George lifted all these characterizations from the 1930s-40s era cinema he’s so fond of, which was absolutely loaded with unambiguous racist caricatures, and then applied them in a well-meaning but very poorly considered and tone-deaf way decades later in his own work. I don’t think Lucas had a racist agenda when he made the prequels, I think he was a kind of clueless sixty-something year old guy with no one to tell him how dated and awful this stuff was.

That could describe most of his 1997-2005 output.

Post
#926641
Topic
Filmmaker and New Yorker film critic Richard Brody's thoughts on the prequels.
Time

BmB said:

TV’s Frink said:
It’s a better film than the other two, but it’s not even close to being good or well made. Parts are good or well made but the overall result is still poor.

It’s enjoyable to watch from beginning to end. Is well structured, reasonably well plotted. The dialogue isn’t completely out there most of the time, and all the action sequences are exciting and move the story forward. The effects are also the best out of any of them, real care was put into both the practical and digital effects with only the gungans really standing out as bad, that owing mostly to McCallum insisting that they ditch Ahmed’s costume to bait the FX oscar.

The major “crimes” it commits is that it contradicts OT canon and doesn’t really have major relevance to the overarching story. But as a standalone film those don’t matter.

Contradicting the OT is unforgivable when you are trying to make a prequel to it. The he tried to shove stupid crap into the OT with his revisions to try and make them fit together better.

Post
#926628
Topic
What is wrong with... <strong>Attack of the Clones</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

I have no idea what that was about, I find Frink unfunny and tend to gloss over his posts. The free speech was more in response to the idea that the forum will become more limited.

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

lovelikewinter said:
As for “offensive” speech? I’m a free speech advocate and can usually let it all roll off. I hate censorship. I have no sympathy for perpetual victims or pearl-clutchers. Open and honest discussion is the best.

Privately-owned forums, web-based or otherwise, aren’t bound by the first amendment. It is perfectly legitimate and reasonable for them to have rules of conduct. If someone doesn’t like that, they can leave. Membership here is completely voluntary.

Did I bring up the first amendment at all? No. I stated that open and honest discussion is the best thing. The problem is all to often that rules of conduct become tools to pave the way to censorship of ideas: you start going far beyond common decency and the reasonable leaves the room. Just look at what happened to CBR. They changed the rules in such a draconian way that if you say something as mild as “Frank Miller sucks” they come down on you.

I hate to have that happen here.

Post
#926585
Topic
What is wrong with... <strong>Attack of the Clones</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

I believe that some PT fans are upset because of the Disney Era Lucasfilm’s pro OT sentiment. I get that, all OOT fans get that. We lived it for years.

I love that this place is open. We can say X sucked or Y is a terrible actor and not be considered out of line and taken out to the woodshed. You can have divergent opinions, heck one poster here only likes Star Wars 1977! There is no hive-mind like on TFN or the PTAS or numerous other sites of numerous other fandoms. We are very lucky.

As for “offensive” speech? I’m a free speech advocate and can usually let it all roll off. I hate censorship. I have no sympathy for perpetual victims or pearl-clutchers. Open and honest discussion is the best.