logo Sign In

Starboy

User Group
Members
Join date
31-Aug-2004
Last activity
4-Dec-2019
Posts
421

Post History

Post
#82188
Topic
Myths
Time
Nice. I fully appreciate the whimsical stuff I also remember the the argument that hell was endothermic, which someone submitted on a final.

I also appreciate your point of view (referring to all your posts). I'm glad to have you in the discussion. A lot of knowledge and thoughtfulness goes into your points which is good both for the discussion and for each of us to defend or propose our own understanding of the truth.

Lastly, welcome to the message board. Sorry it started in being pissed off.

Now, in seriousness, some thoughts.

- if God is God, He exists outside of time. What happened before or after Jesus' death matters to we who exist inside creation, but to God and to those who are dead, there is no before or after. For God to be subject to time would make Him cease to be God, and would make time pre-existant to God.

- Add another quote to your list, It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of the needle than a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. I say to you, unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and the pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. If you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'move from here to there,' and it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you. The first, as I said above, was telling people that success in life was not a requisite or sign of salvation. The second was saying that you had to be more righteous than the most righteous people on earth to enter heaven (the scribes and pharisees dedicated their whole lives to learning and understanding God's law). Which is to say, righteousness cannot get you into heaven. The third says that even with the smallest faith, we can do anything. But we can't do anything, like move mountains or get ourselves into heaven, so even faith has nothing to do with it.

What he's getting at here is what he says later, "I am the way and the truth and the life." It isn't success or righteousness or faith that Christianity preaches, it is the OBJECT of our faith. It is not by actively doing anything; by obedience, by growing and living our faith, or anything that we get into heaven. We can't actively get into heaven. It is by passively accepting. The void between God and man is uncrossable by man. A God of perfect justice demands that justice, and the wages of any and all sin is death. To reconcile perfect justice wiht perfect love, God took that death in our place. And for God, who is outside of time, that separation of God from God, that very real death and schism that happened on the cross, is eternal. To us in creation, it looks like three days in Hell and it's all over, but not so from the perspective on the throne.

But God has said "you deserve death for what you have done with creation, with yourselves, and what you have done to me. But I cannot bear to be separated from you." And he went in our place, to be with us. To get into heaven, you accept what he did for you, that's all.

And in beginning that love relationship with him, He will make you righteous as you grow, He will grow your faith, He will bless you as he sees fit to bless you, but all those things follow the object of your faith, they do not precede or replace it. It's all on his shoulders, and to be a Christian, you have to humbly accept how little you had to do with any of it, but in that broken failure, to accept Him.

---

So that's a serious note in response to some whimsy. I just wanted to lay it out plain and simple for once rather than keep touching on smaller parts of it here and there.

And that is the truth. If you disagree and don't believe it, that is your decision to make. If you understand it but don't want it, that's your decision too. I don't say any of this to convince or persuade anyone. I have reasons and arguments behind those claims, but ultimately it's between you and the silence in your heart to take it or reject it. I just want to lay it out there because I'm tired of Time Magazine and college professors and historians trying to tell the world what Jesus is about.
Post
#81936
Topic
Myths
Time
And anyway the point is, the prevailing mindset back then was that if you were rich it indicated that you were blessed by God, while the poor were being punished. Being rich was viewed by the secular religious people (those who followed the code without really involving God in the whole thing) as a sign of righteousness.

Whatever the literal translation, the point is, a rich man can't get himself into heaven. Jesus doesn't then say "go make yourself poor so you can get into heaven." The disciples response, "then who can be saved?" not "so we need to get rid of our money?", indicates that they understood what he was saying. The prevailing opinion, poor people are unrighteous and rich people have honored God. Jesus is saying rich people can't enter heaven either, basically saying no one can enter heaven.

So the statement appears to be addressing the human need for God, not some statement about material possessions. No one can naturally fit into heaven, no one has earned the right or made themselves into something that can enter heaven. Hence the need for God's involvement, and His sacrifice.

Elsewhere it's not a sin to be rich, but it is a sin to ignore the needs of others or value your money above God. To be unwilling to lose it or sacrifice it when called to. I guess you could call it the difference between "having" and "possessing", if that makes sense (read AW Tozer, he's got a whole chapter on it).

I know this isn't directly on point, but it came up. It's a great travesty when the bible is read verse by verse rather than as a whole because it gets misquoted, misused, misunderstood, and then you get comments about "contradicitons in the bible" from people who have never read it and so forth. It riles me up so I felt it important to explain the cultural and written context of that statement for those who don't know it, since this is one of those "verses in a vacuum."

Anyway, carry on.
Post
#81775
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
As I've said many times, I tend to sit about a year behind the gaming world so that I can buy for 10-20 bucks a pop. Sometimes I can't wait, but most of the time it's a good deal. So I actually look forward to games that are already out. Go figure.

Can't wait for the price to drop on:
Ninja Gaiden
Ratchet and Jak 3
Fable
Xmen Legends
Halo 2 (I'll probably jump the gun on that one, just to play with my old college roomies on the net)
KOTOR 2
Star Ocean

And the ones I'm actually looking forward to:
Xenosaga 2
Kingdom Hearts 2
Far Cry (xbox)
Jade Empire
Republic Commando (although it's possible the graphics/engine will be way behind the curve, as Lucas arts tends to be. Playing through Bounty Hunter, it looks like they borrowed some textures from Dark Forces and/or Shadows of the Empire. Trade franchise for quality, as usual)

And if I ever get a gamecube:
Metroids
Any and all Zeldas
Mario sunshine and kart
Post
#81808
Topic
The Star Wars Kid...
Time
Just did some quick googling, and N Sync seems to be saying that they were filmed. And then later cut. I can't tell the order of what happened or anything. And I don't know N Sync very well. But I DO know that the Jedi who throws Anakin his Saber while in the arena looks freakishly like and N Sync member, and it appears that they were at least filmed.

Whatever. I can't get to the bottom of it. I'll trust you Bossk. But that guy...
Post
#81774
Topic
Classic Games
Time
If any of you have run into an xbox with the emulators loaded onto it, I'm sure you'll agree it is the ultimate classics machine. I've been to a party or two including one of those things and no matter what else is going on, everyone seems to gravitate around the memories. And you can have EVERYTHING on there.

Someone walks in - "hey, do you have Rush N' Attack?" someone says - "hmm...let me check, oh, right, we have everything. Yeah."

Whether it's the memories, or the quality, or the community, classic games spread the joy like no other.
Post
#81642
Topic
New PS2
Time
Touch screen, baby.

I got to hand it to Nintendo. When they announced the DS, I was just thinking "that's it, the end of Nintendo." I know they took a hit this generation, although they've been pulling through with the handhelds. But I thought the DS was the nail in the coffin, it sounded like such a terrible idea.

But they pulled it off. now that I see it and everything, it's not a bad idea. We'll see how it does over time.

Oh yeah, I think it also has wireless networking.
Post
#81588
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
Hey, about Front Mission 4: it's still 24.99 at gamestop. Best Buy is currently getting it off their shelves so I just grabbed it for 14.99 on their website.

It got bad reviews pretty universally, I think because of expectations. Coming off of mechwarrior and such, they wanted something action oriented. It's a very slow game with tons of menu customization and set up time. Those who know what to expect, i.e., those who were looking for the next FF Tactics or Dynasty Tactics, loved it.

I haven't played it yet, but my friends highly recommend it. Just know what you are getting. You aren't driving mechs around, you're picking options from a menu and playing a board game. A board game that kicks butt.
Post
#81624
Topic
New PS2
Time
I think that's more of a function of Nintendo taking a dive than Sony doing something right. Oh well. I can still remember the N64 glory days.

Anyway, I'm poking around now, and MAN I wish I'd picked up three or four PSTwo's. Those things are selling great now and would have paid for themselves. Oh well.
Post
#81616
Topic
Riddles
Time
While we're waiting, I'm going to post a guess.

2 3 4 5 28 - that's 5 numbers. Split the 28 into its digits:
2 2 3 4 5 8 - that's 6 numbers and twin 2s, and it adds up to 24.

But I doubt that's it. 1 2 3 8 19 would work with the same reasoning, and countless others.
Post
#81614
Topic
Classic Games
Time
River City Ransom will forever be my favorite classic.

But lately I've been working through the Sonic series and Zelda 2. I've amassed quite a classics collection in my older age (being mid-20s).

Has anyone played Super Dodgeball on the NES? That game completely escaped me back in the day, but it is awesome!
Post
#81432
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
Chiming in after a long time off this thread:

Wow, good zelda-ness. Maybe I will get a gamecube and catch up on my Zelda, Mario, and Metroid. Eventually.

And the second thing, I finally beat Halo. This last weekend. Back in 01-02 I got up to the last level, but college graduation left me Halo-less. I didn't have access to it until this last summer and I've been working through a series of games. Halo's turn came up and I'm so glad. Playing through the game again was great, and the ending was fabulous. But everyone on earth but me already knows that.

It was a high point for the weekend. And I can jump straight on to 2 now!
Post
#81271
Topic
Help
Time
These archives are purged pretty regularly.

Option 1) go to the forum and see if it's still there
Option 2) go to search and input date criteria
Option 3) it's gone. 3 is pretty likely. Sorry : / You can always start it up again?

If there's any other option, I don't know about it. Jay would be the authority.
Post
#81266
Topic
Riddles
Time
I don't really understand the question...does that mean that one number must be even? If so, only one number? Or is one number a double digit number that you split and add the digits? Do all these numbers have to be different or can they be the same? Sorry. I think Simon must understand. That looks like a good answer.
Post
#81054
Topic
New PS2
Time
You have to buy an adapter. I don't know if they WEREN'T forward looking, or if they WERE and saw a way to juice more money out of us. Seems like you're paying the same as an xbox but you get less hardware, fewer controller ports, no harddrive, no internet...all you get is the PS2 game library which is funded by the largest market share...

Which, honestly, is enough for me. But the xbox is a better deal.