- Post
- #287927
- Topic
- Happy 30th Anniversary, Star Wars!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/287927/action/topic#287927
- Time
ShiftyEyes
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 11-Jul-2004
- Last activity
- 14-Apr-2024
- Posts
- 640
Post History
- Post
- #287848
- Topic
- Happy 30th Anniversary, Star Wars!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/287848/action/topic#287848
- Time
- Post
- #287483
- Topic
- Ideas: 'Firefly - Season Two' (the Serenity film edited into a Firefly S2?)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/287483/action/topic#287483
- Time
EDIT: Didn't realize they released a fullscreen version on DVD, so I guess if that's what you're working with it might be okay.
- Post
- #287445
- Topic
- Ideas: 'Firefly - Season Two' (the Serenity film edited into a Firefly S2?)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/287445/action/topic#287445
- Time
Originally posted by: Mojo_LA
Cropping it to 1.85 will be fine, it was made with protection for 1.85, so you won't lose any important image information (much like cropping movies made with "open matte").
I don't understand how this applies. If Mitch is started with the 2.35:1 image, he'll still need to cut off the sides to get it to 1.85:1. Unless he's working from a fullscreen (unmatted) transfer of the film, everything in the 2.35 image he's using is considered "important". Or are you saying that the film was shot in 2.35 with extraneous information on the sides, which would be a relatively uncommon way of shooting a movie. If so, do you have any proof that it was shot this way?Cropping it to 1.85 will be fine, it was made with protection for 1.85, so you won't lose any important image information (much like cropping movies made with "open matte").
- Post
- #286768
- Topic
- The Visual Effects Society Unveils “50 Most Influential Visual Effects Films of All Time”
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/286768/action/topic#286768
- Time
- Post
- #286710
- Topic
- The Official babyhum Release Thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/286710/action/topic#286710
- Time
- Post
- #285742
- Topic
- "BRING BACK STAR WARS" Channel 4 UK documentary coming soon...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/285742/action/topic#285742
- Time
Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
Can't cite my source cuz I don't recall, but I remember reading somewhere that AG's sequel cameos were both shot at the same time
before ESB production was in full swing, maybe only a short while after SW production wrapped.
Guinness came back for ESB and ROTJ on two separate shoots largely because back in the day (don't know if he still does this), Lucas was pretty generous and gave actors a small percentage of the film's profits. Guinness got 1% off of the original, which turned out to be a hefty sum, and felt indebted to Lucas and so he came back for the two sequels. Can't cite my source cuz I don't recall, but I remember reading somewhere that AG's sequel cameos were both shot at the same time
before ESB production was in full swing, maybe only a short while after SW production wrapped.
- Post
- #281328
- Topic
- Spider Man 2 Extended Cut - In January on FX (Clips Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/281328/action/topic#281328
- Time
- Post
- #281006
- Topic
- Info: The Making of The Empire Strikes Back (Michel Parbot)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/281006/action/topic#281006
- Time
- Post
- #280862
- Topic
- Help Wanted: anyone have the old 20th Century Fox Logo in good quality?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/280862/action/topic#280862
- Time
- Post
- #280485
- Topic
- Anyone else totally disregard Leia being Luke's sister?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/280485/action/topic#280485
- Time
- Post
- #280484
- Topic
- How does Star Wars compare?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/280484/action/topic#280484
- Time
2. Well, I really love the first two SW films. Beyond that, it's still a pretty entertaining bunch of films (even the prequels!). As far as comparisons to other film series go, LOTR and Indy are up there with SW for me. The Godfather is great as well (I even like Part 3). And Back to the Future is a great piece of entertainment too (though I think the original is by far the best of the bunch). James Bond is a bit tougher to classify since beyond the first few, they have very little to do with one another. Still, I'd say at least half of the Bond flicks are good. Harry Potter is fun too.
3. LOTR was pretty big for me. But maybe that has more to do with the fact that I was born after ROTJ and wasn't introduced to SW until I was about 8. The SW prequels were a little disappointing, so LOTR and other franchises helped fill the void. Probably the most excitement I get from SW nowadays is learning about how they were made, the development of the ideas, etc.
- Post
- #279732
- Topic
- FAN EDIT REQUEST THREAD - Post your dream Fan Edits Here!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/279732/action/topic#279732
- Time
- Post
- #278925
- Topic
- Idea: New KING KONG 2005 Extended Edition EDIT
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/278925/action/topic#278925
- Time
- Post
- #275800
- Topic
- Taxi Driver commentary? (from the Criterion LD) (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/275800/action/topic#275800
- Time
- Post
- #275797
- Topic
- Info: The NEW 007 DVD's
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/275797/action/topic#275797
- Time
- Color timing is off in some sequences of films. Bond's reintroduction sequence in "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" typically hasn't been as blue/purple as it appears in the Ultimate Editions (see here). The first 45 seconds or so of the title sequence of "Live and Let Die" is way too bright and orange (see here). There are other color timing differences between the new and old editions, but these two are the most jarring.
- "A View to a Kill" and "Goldeneye" have been cropped (see here and here).
Anyway, all the films look stunning, especially the Connery ones. The color timing issues on OHMSS and LALD don't really bother me, but some purists are pretty annoyed by it. They're even more upset with the cropping on AVTAK and Goldeneye, but nothing important seems to be missing in each shot. Still, it's not really about more or less image. It's a matter of the correct one.
- Post
- #274674
- Topic
- //Star Wars Begins\\: HD Version Now on Vimeo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/274674/action/topic#274674
- Time
Also, the Criterion Collection of "Kind Hearts and Coronets" includes a rare hour-long chat with Alec Guinness from 1977. Of course, SW is mentioned towards the end and he briefly discusses how he feels about the film and relays his money anecdote (he says George offered him a 2% bonus, but when he bumped into Gary Kurtz, Kurtz said something like, "Oh, you mean the extra 1%?" and Guinness left it at that).
- Post
- #273571
- Topic
- a rumor from thedigitalbits.com...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/273571/action/topic#273571
- Time
- Post
- #272614
- Topic
- Star Wars 3D Animation TV Programme News
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/272614/action/topic#272614
- Time
- Post
- #272613
- Topic
- Do you legally own the OOT?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/272613/action/topic#272613
- Time
Otherwise, I own the '97 SE VHS tapes in pan and scan. Ugh. I'm afraid I was 8 or 9 at the time and unenlightened about aspect ratios. And then the 2004 DVD set in widescreen.
- Post
- #272562
- Topic
- The Godfather - a fan edit idea.
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/272562/action/topic#272562
- Time
- Post
- #272476
- Topic
- *** The Official DigitalFreakNYC Release Thread*** (SW, Indy + Others!)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/272476/action/topic#272476
- Time
Originally posted by: digitalfreaknyc
Nope. But now that you mention it, I started to watch the Returning to Jedi disc last night and I saw the lightsaber that MUST have been from that.
WTF is the story behind it?
From what I recall over on the Returning to Jedi thread, a poster had somehow acquired the actual prop and made a video of it. Nope. But now that you mention it, I started to watch the Returning to Jedi disc last night and I saw the lightsaber that MUST have been from that.
WTF is the story behind it?
- Post
- #269417
- Topic
- Daredevil - Spence (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/269417/action/topic#269417
- Time
My only complaint is with the music replacement scenes. It sounds like you cut out the soundtrack and put some songs in so there aren't any sound effects or anything. It makes the scenes feel a bit weird, but I understand it's not an easy thing to do. Anyway, good job.
- Post
- #268962
- Topic
- Batman Series Edit (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/268962/action/topic#268962
- Time
- Post
- #267549
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Harry Potter & Prisoner of Azkaban - extended version on ABC?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/267549/action/topic#267549
- Time