logo Sign In

ProgMetalMan

User Group
Members
Join date
1-Jan-2013
Last activity
2-Jan-2018
Posts
7

Post History

Post
#1152364
Topic
The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS **
Time

I found my feelings on this movie to be rather conflicted. Some of it was amazing, some of it felt very prequel-esque. Maybe it’s my resentment of the current state of animation, but those little birdie mofos hanging out with Chewie reminded me too much of Minions and cute George Lucas creatures. The pacing left a lot to be desired, particularly in the first act, but that seems to be a recurring issue over the past decade. Even the OT had pacing issues.

I’ve seen praise of the subversion elsewhere. Much of it seemed predictable, especially in the first half. Maybe I’m just a jerk who’s been immersed in postmodernism. After all, I thought Love Is An Open Door was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek on my first viewing of Frozen, but many were surprised at the subversions of that movie.

I loved the Rey/Ben scenes, and how they hearken back to the Throne Room, which happen to be my favorite parts of the OT. The Rey/Luke scenes were very enjoyable as well. The notable exception was that milk scene. I was more disturbed by that than I should’ve been; heck, I watched my own toenail surgery with no issue. Still though, it gave me those Ren and Stimpy chills. Luke’s death was handled just as it should’ve been IMO, even if it did necessitate that I fight back manly tears.

For reference, I was not a big fan of TFA and its recycling. I much preferred Rogue One.

SilverWook said:

Porkins4real said:

DrDre said:

NFBisms said:

DrDre said:

Creox said:

DrDre said:

I’ve been thinking a bit more about the broad stroke differences between TLJ and the rest of the saga, particulary the OT, and why some find TLJ refreshing, while others reject it. So, for a change I’m not going to talk about Rey’s Force powers, or Luke’s characterization, but more about in-universe history, and how that affects the story.

I think it is fair to say the OT is steeped in melancholy, and powerful connections to the past. The entire premise of ANH is to defeat the evil Empire, and to return the galaxy to a previous state, the fabled Old Republic. Luke is largely driven by the legend of his father, who’s friend Obi-Wan promises to teach him about an all but forgotten religion that both he and Luke’s father were a part of. The rest of the trilogy is largly set up such that Luke needs to vanguish the enemies of old, Darth Vader, and the Emperor, and avoid the pitfalls, that caused Vader, later revealed to be his father, to turn on his friend, and join the dark side.

To a large degree TFA operates in the same way. It treats Luke Skywalker as a legend of old, that both the heroes and villains are looking for. Luke went looking for the first Jedi temple, a place presumably steeped in Jedi history. It’s hinted, that Rey has a strong connection to the past, and Kylo Ren, who’s directly related to two other legends of the past, Han and Leia, was seduced to the dark side by some mysterious larger than life old anti-Yoda figure. Both Rey and Kylo Ren are struggling with their past, and the film ends with Kylo severing one of the links to his past by killing a past legend, while Rey connects with it by finding a past legend.

TLJ completely breaks with this Star Wars tradition. It actively deflates the past by telling us the history and legends we cherish are not as great as we want to believe. It actively cuts almost all ties to the past by killing off the remaining classic heroes (Leia technically not in the film), and even the links to the past TFA introduced. The mysterious Snoke is unceremoniously cast aside, and the secret of Rey’s past is, that she has no past, at least not one that’s relevant to her future. The family connection between good and evil that drove the OT and TFA is all but ignored, and then finally killed for good, when Leia gives up on her son, and Luke dies. What remains is a conflict between new heroes and new villains, that either killed their past, or don’t really have one.

It’s a bold move, which is sadly undercut by a strict adherence to the OT aesthetic and the OT’s basic premise of an Empire versus a small band of rebels. The question is why did the creators and by extension Disney decide to reboot the franchise, whilst also severing most connections to the past? My theory is, that it was done to make Star Wars more accessible to the general audience. Most of us hardcore fans will see the movies anyway. I know I probably will, despite my lack of enthousiasm. Anyone without much knowledge of Star Wars history will be able to see and enjoy episode IX. It’s starting point is similar to episode IV. There’s an evil Empire led by an evil maniac, a struggling rebellion led by an aspiring Jedi, and it looks like it’s part of the Star Wars brand. You need not know more.

It IS a bold move and one in which I think needed to happen for SW to evolve.

I might agree, if the bold move was used to create a new story, and new Star Wars lore but it wasn’t. It’s a reboot, and one that strips Star Wars from much of the deeper layers and themes, that made it stand out from the average blockbuster, in my opinion of course.

I think the themes and layers of TLJ are deeper and a little more meaningful than anything in both the OT and PT, especially in how the philosophical ideas tackled are all about our understanding of those previously established themes. It may be more of a meta-deconstruction of the themes, rather than a continuing re-affirmation of them, but they are still there and are still needed to be understood.

Well to me deconstructing and understanding are two very different things. IMO TLJ deconstructs the themes of the previous films not to provide understanding, but to devalue them. It’s thesis is not just that these themes are far less relevant going forward, but that they weren’t all that important in the first place, punctuated by Yoda’s page turner remark. The fact that the legends of old are used (or abused depending on your point of view) to transmit this message is also in of itself a clear attempt at devaluation, since even they are made to adhere to the new order.

I think it’s disingenuous to say TLJ is an average blockbuster or that anything it has to say is on that level of Transformers, or Geostorm, or Avengers. If anything, it’s a little too heady for its own good. I definitely think it has pacing and tonal issues, as well as one too many plot threads that clearly have muddled what it was trying to say in the end, but its intentions and fundamental ideas have more depth than just “insert SW brand here.” It can’t be that, as well as trying to burn down Star Wars traditions, at the same time. It’s trying to be so much more, and whether or not it succeeds is just a matter of opinion.

And while something can be said about how it uses an evil Empire and plucky rebellion, as well as TIEs, X-Wings, and lightsabers, that’s all superficial when what informs and drives those things are clearly different enough to not be “Star Wars” to many people thematically.

Yes, but the whole point is, that the general audience doesn’t care about the themes that drove Star Wars in the past. In my view the current owners of the franchise feel Star Wars’ themes and connections to the past are a stumbling block for the general audience to connect with the material. In order to facilitate the growth of the potential market of these films, these themes and historic connections need to be simplified or removed.

Then the people running the franchise are DUMB. My kids, nieces and nephews all love the OT more than anything that came after, they were born 30+ years after ANH, yet they love it. I had 5-year-old ask “why luke doing that?”. They don’t need to worry about growing the audience, and ignoring what made the franchise so popular is not the way to do it.

Disney should know better. Look at the lineups they have for crappy rides that have been around for 60 years. Why? they still work and multigenerations experienced them in their youth and enjoy seeing their kids enjoy them.

Interesting, as I know a segment of the Disney theme park fanbase sees red every time one of those classic rides gets tweaked to be more PC, or has modern elements added. Pirates Of The Caribbean being a prime example. It’s like the Special Edition of E ticket attractions.

C’mon now. It’s not the Special Edition. It’s a Special Edition. Along with the attic of The Haunted Mansion, and most of Epcot for the past 25 years.

And Space Mountain is the GOUT. An over-promised half-assed facelift of an aging favorite.

Post
#620277
Topic
Despecialized Edition: Help with burning to discs
Time

I am having this issue as well. After obtaining the DVD9 iso, I attempted to open it with VLC to no avail, and then tried to mount it with Alcohol 52%.

It gets mounted successfully, but Windows won't read it. It says:

Title: Disk is not formatted

Windows cannot read from this disk. The disk might be corrupted, or it could be using a format that is not compatible with Windows.

[OK]

Post
#618303
Topic
Search Function
Time

When I attempt to do any search, I get a "connecting..." message for a few minutes (Firefox 17) and then I get the following error page (using the search "French" as a meaningless example):

The web site you are accessing has experienced an unexpected error.
Please contact the website administrator.


The following information is meant for the website developer for debugging purposes.
Error Occurred While Processing Request
The request has exceeded the allowable time limit Tag: CFQUERY
 
The error occurred in E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\components\ForumSearch.cfc: line 151
Called from E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\search-results.cfm: line 36
Called from E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\search-results.cfm: line 1
149 : 							SELECT intForumID
150 : 							FROM tblForumUserGroupCategoryAccess
151 : 							WHERE intGroupID = #arguments.ForumGroupID# AND bitRead = 1 )
152 : 				END
153 : 		

Resources:

 

Browser   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0
Remote Address   *PM if needed*
Referrer   http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/forum.cfm/Star-Wars-Preservations-and-Other-Fan-Projects/forum/17/
Date/Time   09-Jan-13 10:20 PM
Stack Trace
at cfForumSearch2ecfc561348969$funcFORUMSEARCHRESULTS.runFunction(E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\components\ForumSearch.cfc:151) at cfsearch2dresults2ecfm1414989553._factor2(E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\search-results.cfm:36) at cfsearch2dresults2ecfm1414989553.runPage(E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\search-results.cfm:1)

coldfusion.runtime.RequestTimedOutException: The request has exceeded the allowable time limit Tag: CFQUERY
	at coldfusion.sql.Executive.getRowSet(Executive.java:446)
	at coldfusion.sql.Executive.executeQuery(Executive.java:1252)
	at coldfusion.sql.Executive.executeQuery(Executive.java:1008)
	at coldfusion.sql.Executive.executeQuery(Executive.java:939)
	at coldfusion.sql.SqlImpl.execute(SqlImpl.java:325)
	at coldfusion.tagext.sql.QueryTag.executeQuery(QueryTag.java:831)
	at coldfusion.tagext.sql.QueryTag.doEndTag(QueryTag.java:521)
	at cfForumSearch2ecfc561348969$funcFORUMSEARCHRESULTS.runFunction(E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\components\ForumSearch.cfc:151)
	at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod.invoke(UDFMethod.java:418)
	at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod$ReturnTypeFilter.invoke(UDFMethod.java:360)
	at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod$ArgumentCollectionFilter.invoke(UDFMethod.java:324)
	at coldfusion.filter.FunctionAccessFilter.invoke(FunctionAccessFilter.java:59)
	at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod.runFilterChain(UDFMethod.java:277)
	at coldfusion.runtime.UDFMethod.invoke(UDFMethod.java:463)
	at coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy.invoke(TemplateProxy.java:453)
	at coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy.invoke(TemplateProxy.java:320)
	at coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage._invoke(CfJspPage.java:2222)
	at coldfusion.tagext.lang.InvokeTag.doEndTag(InvokeTag.java:358)
	at cfsearch2dresults2ecfm1414989553._factor2(E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\search-results.cfm:36)
	at cfsearch2dresults2ecfm1414989553.runPage(E:\Inetpub\originaltrilogy.com\wwwroot\forum\search-results.cfm:1)
	at coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage.invoke(CfJspPage.java:196)
	at coldfusion.tagext.lang.IncludeTag.doStartTag(IncludeTag.java:370)
	at coldfusion.filter.CfincludeFilter.invoke(CfincludeFilter.java:65)
	at coldfusion.filter.ApplicationFilter.invoke(ApplicationFilter.java:273)
	at coldfusion.filter.RequestMonitorFilter.invoke(RequestMonitorFilter.java:48)
	at coldfusion.filter.MonitoringFilter.invoke(MonitoringFilter.java:40)
	at coldfusion.filter.PathFilter.invoke(PathFilter.java:86)
	at coldfusion.filter.ExceptionFilter.invoke(ExceptionFilter.java:70)
	at coldfusion.filter.ClientScopePersistenceFilter.invoke(ClientScopePersistenceFilter.java:28)
	at coldfusion.filter.BrowserFilter.invoke(BrowserFilter.java:38)
	at coldfusion.filter.NoCacheFilter.invoke(NoCacheFilter.java:46)
	at coldfusion.filter.GlobalsFilter.invoke(GlobalsFilter.java:38)
	at coldfusion.filter.DatasourceFilter.invoke(DatasourceFilter.java:22)
	at coldfusion.CfmServlet.service(CfmServlet.java:175)
	at coldfusion.bootstrap.BootstrapServlet.service(BootstrapServlet.java:89)
	at jrun.servlet.FilterChain.doFilter(FilterChain.java:86)
	at coldfusion.monitor.event.MonitoringServletFilter.doFilter(MonitoringServletFilter.java:42)
	at coldfusion.bootstrap.BootstrapFilter.doFilter(BootstrapFilter.java:46)
	at jrun.servlet.FilterChain.doFilter(FilterChain.java:94)
	at jrun.servlet.FilterChain.service(FilterChain.java:101)
	at jrun.servlet.ServletInvoker.invoke(ServletInvoker.java:106)
	at jrun.servlet.JRunInvokerChain.invokeNext(JRunInvokerChain.java:42)
	at jrun.servlet.JRunRequestDispatcher.invoke(JRunRequestDispatcher.java:286)
	at jrun.servlet.ServletEngineService.dispatch(ServletEngineService.java:543)
	at jrun.servlet.jrpp.JRunProxyService.invokeRunnable(JRunProxyService.java:203)
	at jrunx.scheduler.ThreadPool$DownstreamMetrics.invokeRunnable(ThreadPool.java:320)
	at jrunx.scheduler.ThreadPool$ThreadThrottle.invokeRunnable(ThreadPool.java:428)
	at jrunx.scheduler.ThreadPool$UpstreamMetrics.invokeRunnable(ThreadPool.java:266)
	at jrunx.scheduler.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:66)