logo Sign In

Marty.McFly

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-Mar-2011
Last activity
21-Oct-2015
Posts
202

Post History

Post
#541583
Topic
BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
Time

twooffour said:

Why, why is this so impossible to get?

If you're gonna claim with certainty that someone has a "natural beauty", you need to know for certain that the beauty has in no way been "helped along" by any artificial means such as facial operations (chin augmentation being a common and less problematic one, in the cases of receding chins - it was just an EXAMPLE).

Otherwise, what's the point in claiming that someone is "naturally" beautiful?

 

Ah I see. LOL.

Well, I know this girl personally and I can guarantee she's 100% natural. No surgeries whatsoever.

 

Edit> Kristin Kreuk is really hot, Lana Lang is annoying but hot.

Post
#541557
Topic
BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
Time

Ah, if the chin thing was an inside joke from past posts, I didn't get it...as you can tell lol. i haven't been in off topic long enough to get those.

If it's not, still dont get it but wonder, why the hell are you looking at her chin?! It's like making a comment about the pick-up truck! Yeah there is a pick up truck there somewhere lol

Post
#541556
Topic
'Chemical castration' for pedophiles
Time

Bingowings said:

Well, yeah. I know you know it wasn't literal, maybe a better way to express it would be to say they're among the lowest of the low.

It would indeed be impossible to define evil as, everyone would have a different opinion but there are certain things most people would agree on I think, like with pedos and rapists.

You'd find people more divided on opinion on murder for example. I believe I would absolutely be able to kill someone if in self defense or defending a loved one from imminent danger of death or extreme harm. Never been in that situation so I don't know for sure, but to molest a child or rape crosses every line established by...I want to say every, but lets say almost all societies.

And I'm not calling them evil because I don't want to turn this into a religious thing, just sick bastards, unstable people, etc.

 

I'm not against the measures taken in SK, but it sure is tricky when you have a legal system far from perfect.

Post
#541545
Topic
'Chemical castration' for pedophiles
Time

Bingowings said:

Can it be reversed?

Does it have damaging side effects?

I ask because should a miscarriage of justice occur (and they frequently do) and this be done on an innocent person how would you compensate them if they are screwed up by this procedure?

Also the link between sex drive and child abuse has not be proved.

It could create an impression of safety which may not exist.

This sort of thing used to be done to homosexuals (back when that was illegal) and it led to awful side effects and suicides.

Containment seems to be the safer option (if someone is later found to be innocent you can compensate them as much as that is possible and set them free).

Dug a bit more about it. It seems the treatment would last at least 15 years, so if not reversible per se, it's not permanent.

Side effects: Possible heart disease after a very long exposure to the drugs.

---

I see what you're getting at and I agree, the chance of someone being wrongly accused is significant simply because no law system in the world is perfect. Even an angry ex-wife could accuse her ex just to get back at him; extreme, I know, but it could happen.

Would it be better to administer the drugs only to repeat offenders? Possibly although I believe the parents of that one second molested child wouldn't agree.

Same thing should be done with rapists IMO. All this will no doubt cause controversy as the death penalty does, what I will never understand is how human rights activists still defend or try to defend these people when they're clearly not human and should have no rights at all.

Post
#541515
Topic
Doctor Who
Time

While I do get what you're saying Bingo, at it makes sense to ask those questions, my memory sucks big time lol. I'll try to watch the complete season between Friday and Saturday before watching the finale.

I pretty much avoid all kinds of spoilers so I don't know if Matt, Karen or Rory have contracts for next season or not (DON'T TELL IF YOU (meaning anyone) KNOW, please), but I don't think the Doctor is dying there at all. Just hope for an intelligent, satisfactory explanation and not some lame ass "Deux -ex machina" type explanation like in Lost (and many others) or a freaking angel or whatever like Kara Thrace.

If they do screw it up somehow, at least it isn't the series finale so they have time to correct it, unlike the other two.

Post
#541511
Topic
Doctor Who
Time

doubleofive said:

http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/doctor-who-confidential-axed-26869.htm

Also mentioned as being cancelled, the "long-running sitcom Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps". What a name. I love England.

ARGHHH! I love Confidential! it's the second most important thing the BBC is getting rid of that I love. The first one being the Formula One amazing coverage in favor of PPV, Robert Murdoch's Sky if anyone was wondering.

But sure they are moving to the new £900,000,000 complex when there was no real need to do so, and all the expense planned for the olympics.

Bah. Fuck the BBC!

Post
#541509
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

doubleofive said:

 

Adywan just got so excited about doing the prequels, he's deleted all of the work done on ESBR and will get back to it after he's done the prequels, RotJR, and ANHRHD. You can expect ESBR in about 15 years. ;-)

 

PLEASE tweet that, and post it in the SW:R official site and FB.

Let us know about the reactions you get. ;)