logo Sign In

Luke Skywalker

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Mar-2003
Last activity
8-Feb-2022
Posts
2,510

Post History

Post
#262212
Topic
My First YAGE
Time
Originally posted by: Stinky-Dinkins
Originally posted by: Shimraa
man i just dont know how this happened, the site went trolless for 2 years, what did jay do differently in the past year, is beyond me.

Obi the truth is that having lots of moderation and tons of rules in place, will not make a very good online community. With too many rules and strict enforcing them, people dont feel at home. they feel like they are always being watched. with this site, it takes ALOT to get banned, or at least it did. i beleive jimbo was the first person to be banned and he reached like 3000 posts, and was around for about 6 months of complaining before he was booted. so i donno how you can say OT isnt a community, its more of a community then probably 90% of other forums out there.

p.s. i dont take nanner seriously, if i did then i would be sending pm's to the mods, but to date i havent.



You're a terrible member. 10,000 posts of unreadable garbage.

I await the day you make your YAGE thread, post 1,500 times in it, and leave.


LOL!!
from now on im living my life with the motto WWSD.

"what would stinky do?"
Post
#261779
Topic
Live Free Or Die Hard
Time
i dunno about this one.. the first die hard was clearly the best of them all.

but this doesnt have the die hard look to it. i mean its going to definatly be more like 3 than the other two.
the part where the car almost crushes him before he ducks between the other two cars is just bad. both looks wise and idea wise.

but whos knows.. trailers are sometimes decieving...
cough cough episode 1 cough cough..
Post
#261709
Topic
My First YAGE
Time
oh so thats what it is...

i thought you were pulling the sort of trick that little kids do to their parents when they're not getting enough attention. you know when they tell their parents they're running away from home. they've got their bag packed and are just about to walk out that door but they keep using some lame excuse so that they dont really have to leave.

are your bags really packed?
or are you hoping your parents will tell you that they're sorry and that they love you?

this is pathetic
Post
#261650
Topic
My First YAGE
Time
you say you hate this place and post a goodbye, yet you come back to comment on people saying goodbye to you...
so in reality you just want attention.

its funny that you think this board is not monitored well. there are forums out there that would make your ass bleed the way your being such a girl about this.

you want to leave then get the fuck out, and take the rest of the whiners with you.
Post
#261468
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
my work has a ton of DS lites. only in black and onyx though.
we've been sold out of the pink ones forever now.
a lot of girls have really taken to the DS lite, my girlfriend included. i'd love to borrow hers sometime but unfortunatly pink isnt my colour. so i only play it in the comfort of my home.

my work also finally got their ps3 demo unit hooked up. so far i am not very impressed. the only game that really did make my jaw drop was motorstorm and thats not due out for a lil while. sports games look identical to the xbox360 ones and are still nothing innovative.
plus the unit froze on us a couple times.. lol.

im hoping we get our wii demo unit in real soon.

on another note i am curious at what all you gamers are really looking forward to on the games horizon. whether it be a pc title, console title, handheld or even mobile title.

as early as it is i am absolutly dying to see even the slightest bit of information on the next grand theft auto game.
i hoping we get an early xmas gift from rockstar in the form of a teaser or screenshot or something. the game is set for the october 2007 release which makes it under a year away. i cant wait!!

how about you guys?
Post
#261293
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
oops ya i wasnt getting mad when i put that stuff up in caps... i just wanted to make sure the point got across.

hey if you like consoles thats totally fine with me. im just really getting sick of hearing people bash other systems because they dont like them thats all.

the only times i really have time to play any sort of game is on xmas break and summer due to my full time enrollment in university. i just wish everyone would support their consoles with positive comments rather than put down others with negative ones.

i work at futureshop and have to deal with fanboys on a daily basis. i think thats one reason why i really had to vent in this thread. so i meant no harm by any of my comments. movies and games are my passion. they are the best forms of escapism for me. by the way i may purchase my first console since the ps1. got my name in a raffle for a wii at work. i hope im not dissapointed.

Post
#261191
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Originally posted by: Number20
I haven't noticed that the PC gaming hardware requirements have slowed in the need to upgrade. I remember that about 5-6 years ago, one could buy a pretty good off-the-shelf computer and play anything out there. Today, you need a special "gaming PC" in order to play some of the high-end games. As I said before, in consoles, the manufacturers are locked into certain hardware requirements, so you don't have that as an issue.


Exactly. My computer is a year old, 2.8 GHz 1024 MB Ram

...And I can play Freedom Force vs The 3rd Reich, The Movies and Command and Conquer Generals. No other games made after 2001 have worked on this computer.


personally i think everything on that sounds fine so far... what video card are you running?
if anything that may be the only problem.
Post
#261190
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
Originally posted by: JediSage
Originally posted by: Luke Skywalker
so many things to talk about in this thread....
i will do them one by one because there are so many things ive wanted to discuss lately and this is definatly the time to do it.

the point here is that no console is better than the other. anyone who says that is a ignorant fanboy. each system has their pros and cons and no one can say different. saying that i would like to point out a couple corrections made by people in this thread..

No, statements like this are ignorant. The market decides which console is better. Yes, they all have pros and cons, but if one weren't "better" than the other then the Sega Dreamcast wouldn't have tanked.

1) for the person who was talking about grand turismo costing money... false. sony has since abandoned that idea. they as well as everyone else realized it wouldn't fly and has since cancelled GT:HD and are putting all their work into GT 5. it was a stupid idea to begin with and a very similar situation happened during the ps2 version of GT 3. so before people continue to try and put sony down, this is false.

You're obviously taking what I said out of context, deliberately or not. What I said was that I saw this reported on X-Play. I did not say it would now and forever be the truth. I understand better than most that in technology businesses things change rapidly.

3) someone said pc gaming was dying. this is the biggest joke of a statement if i've ever seen one. but from coming from someone who may not play pc games its not a surprise. when you stick to a specific format you tend to lose grasp on anything outside of your own format. its happens with everyone. but if you look at a game like crysis for example. crysis has so far cost over 27 million dollars to develope. are you telling me that they're putting all this money into a dying format? they're not stupid, they want to make money. take a look at the majority of online games such as Counterstrike, Battlefield 2, or how bout MMORPG's like World of Warcraft or Everquest. World of Warcraft alone has over 7 million subscribers. Sims games are dominating the female market in games (which is impressive because more and more females are becoming gamers.) the fact of the matter is PC gaming is not dying and will never die. as long as games are made on computers they will always have a market.


Again you're making statements with no basis in fact. If you'd actually quoted my previous posts about PC gaming these errors would have been apparent, but since you chose not to I'll refresh your memory:

I've been playing games on PC since the original shareware Doom, and before that I played text-based RPGs on the Vic 20 and C64, Zork on the Apple IIe, custom games on my Tandy Sinclair, so right off the bat your accusation that I may not play pc games is ludicrous. Take a walk into an EB or Gamestop, look at the shelf-space devoted to Console games vs pc games. It's another situation of market forces at work. Is Gears of War being ported to PC? What about Vice City Stories? Bully? Justice League Heroes? God of War? Mortal Kombat?

Is the pc market completely gone? No. Is that what I said? NO. I said that it was DYING.

i hear people say this all the time. "PC's cost too much to maintain if you want to play games on them"

this is about the worst possible excuse in the world. if you dont want to play games with all the bells and whistles. guess what? you dont have to. you can still play a game on low graphics or medium graphics and get the same amount of enjoyment out of it. will better graphics give you a better experience. in some cases yes, probably (depending on who you are i suppose.) but there is no rule that says you must upgrade. that is just a pissing competition between pc gamers which has been around forever. just as it is with the ps3 and xbox 360. fans of the two will be bitching at eachother for years trying to one up the other. and its so old.


Well, let's see, if I have a 1.8ghz CPU on my pc, and Crysis requires a dual-core 3.2ghz minimum, what are my options? A motherboard can only support so much CPU before it needs to be replaced. Then you're still stuck with bottlenecks in the BUS and misc other issues. So, yeah, I can throw a new MB, memory, VID card, etc into my system, but this is being forced to upgrade. This is a fact. The games will not run. Not sure how you turn that into a pissing contest.

the point im making in this regard is that gaming computers are not expensive. they are only expensive if you want them to be.
you could pick up a video card today for about the same amount of money as an xbox 360 and be able to play games that look just as good as the xbox. if a game comes out in a couple years, you can still play it on medium or low settings and have it look like the xbox 360 or (if your a graphics whore) you can spend more money to play a game that will look better than the xbox 360. the whole point is the pc has never been more expensive than a console. if anything its been cheaper.


This is even more ludicrous. I just built a bare-bones gaming pc for my parents (my father plays Call of Duty) with 1GB RAM and a 256MB Video Card for over $700 with no monitor. Until this recent generation of consoles I'd like you to show me an XBOX, PS, or Nintendo system that cost that much. And anyone spending that much and not getting a pc out of it is lost. There's not a console in the world at this time that will give what a pc is giving, and I don't need to purchase a high-def tv to get hi-def graphics from my pc.

I don't think one must sacrifice graphics to have good game play. I think Unreal Tournament 04 for PC is one of the best gaming experiences I've ever had because of the variety of play and also the scalability of the graphics. Far Cry was also exceptional, with some of the best graphics I've ever seen in addition to the most difficult A.I. I've ever played. Standard tvs are not capable of the same resolution of a pc monitor, and that's why I feel that the console experience is somewhat lessened for me because the lack of graphics depth. However, there are some console games that just blew me away, like Resident Evil 4, Hulk Ultimate Destruction, and some of the WWE games. The Sega Genesis was a great experience for me, especially with the sports games (so I'm not only a Nintendo fanboy).



so if the market decides genius then which company has tanked? so far all systems seem to be selling well right? so in fact there is no better system right? thats what im saying!!!! people are nitpicking about stupid shit, and automatically saying "ohhhh sony is doomed" or "nintendo looks like shit, they're going to lose" WRONG!!!

and i didnt take what you said out of context, i was just simply correcting you so people didnt recieve the wrong information. i dont think its fair to mention things about a console which may further tarish its image if its not true. thats all. i dont see whats wrong with that?

again i was not refferring to you not being a pc gamer, but console gamers in general. many people dont look at pc games when they play a console. i mean why would they? i dont look at console games much. but ebgames is a smaller chain. go into a bestbuy or futureshop and then compare them. different chains carry different amounts. and again you must stay current with your info, there are plans to port both Bully and Gears of War to the PC. more platforms more money. thats all these companys care about in the end. hence why GTA4 is going to be multiplatform (except maybe for the Wii, not sure)
but that argument makes just as much sense as saying, will company of heros or world of warcraft be ported to any console. NO? so does that mean console gaming is dying? no lol

as for your computer, this is not the computers fault. point is, usually people will upgrade their cpu every 5 years or whatnot. you claim to be a pc gamer but your computer sounds extremely out of date. so i dont think you've been a pc gamer lately. just like going from a ps1 to a ps3, its gonna cost ya $$$. but im not saying your going to need a $1000 computer. not even.

as for call of duty, no offense but if you were building for that game in general you went overboard. i played the first call of duty with 512 of RAM and 128MB video card (im talking geforce 4 here) and i played it with everything maxed. today you could get that for under $100 prolly. if they still make geforce 4's. this is what i mean when i say people really dont know what they need. now your dad would have no problem playing call of duty 2 i bet or any game after that. you've invested for a couple of years, just as you would on a console. plus they dont even sell regular xbox's anymore. nor will the make games for it. ps2s are already being phased out.

ive said what i needed to though..
Post
#261189
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
Originally posted by: C3PX
Originally posted by: Luke Skywalker


Hm... I don't know what to tell you, Sage. I've enjoyed PC gaming, but anymore it's so hard to keep up with the technology curve that I really can't get into PC gaming anymore.


i agree with him 100%! more than 100% because this is my major gripe with games today. however there is a major flaw to his argument which many people fail to notice.
earlier he said.

I understand full well the Wii is nowhere near as powerful as the PS3, and I don't care. I played a PS3 at Wal-Mart and well, it was a PS2 game with better graphics. (Some NBA or NCAA Basketball game)

Graphics aren't what made me want a GC--Super Smash Bros Melee was. And online Smash Bros Brawl is ultimately what sold me on the Wii. (It's my email address for crying out loud.)



Yeah, Chaltab! Why do you have to be so flaky? J/K! This would also be my complaint. And I really don't care a thing about graphics. One of my most often played games is still Dark Forces for the pc. Trust me, I do not care about graphics. And yet my biggest gripe about PC games is that you cannot keep your technology updated enough. In my case, and I can easily imagine in the case of Darth Chaltab, this has nothing to do with graphics. This has merely to do with the fact that we would like to be able to PLAY them, period. With computer gaming they are constantly making things better, it seems every few years it slows down for a little while, then they start making huge leaps again. I went from a console gamer, to a PC gamer, to no gamer at all because I suddenly woke up one morning and couldn't play any of the new games I was interested in, while a few months ago they all worked beautifully. It has absolutely nothing to do with graphics. In this manner PC gaming gets to be pretty expensive. Also, I don't think anybody has really gotten into any console wars crap, we are just saying our opinions of the new systems. Just because we say that we think Sony is in trouble, doesn't mean we are pissing on Sony because we are Mario or Microsith fanboys. In my opinion Sony, always releases mostly decent products, for quite a bit more money because it bears their brand name. I don't think in any product they are particularly worth it. My friend spend a considerable amount more on a Sony DVD player that he would have on any other brand, and he got less features for it, my little apex DVD player could play discs without any challenge, while his Sony skips with little provocation. I am not saying apex is better than Sony, but that Sony has a pretty bloated price tag for what it is. I think it is the same with any of their products, including the PSX, PS2, and yes the PS3. Looking at the game selections and the systems, I would give my vote to the 360, but then again, the wii looks pretty impressive in the new technology section, while the other two seem like they just have a larger processor and graphics chips. There have been no extremely bias opinions of anything to complain about. If you would like to mediate a console war, I think IGN's forms may be the place to join up.


Ah, your argument against the PC gaming bash, is that you should just stick to the older games, but we are not talking about that. Of course there will always be millions of games to play on the PC, but if you would like to play anything new, then you DO have to upgrade, so there is sort of a rule about it, if you want to play you have to upgrade. There is probably hardly a single PC release this year (other than some stupid casino games) that my system could even consider running.


you say, "I went from a console gamer, to a PC gamer, to no gamer at all because I suddenly woke up one morning and couldn't play any of the new games I was interested in, while a few months ago they all worked beautifully. It has absolutely nothing to do with graphics. " so if its not graphics than what is it? the only thing i can think of is a hardware problem or something may have went on your computer.. either way this has nothing to do with upgrading. maybe you have to reinstall?

as for the console wars things and people being biased, i do recall someone saying "Im hearing a sony fanboy crying right now or something along those lines" Sorry but if thats not being biased i dont know what is.

and when did i say anything about sticking to older games? seriously? i said that you can play any game on the pc without all the bells and whistles on if you dont care about graphics. and NO YOUR WRONG ABOUT HAVING TO BUY NEW STUFF TO PLAY ANY NEW GAMES! i've played every new game this year with a setup i made about 2 years ago. but at least with the pc you are given a choice! im not saying you will never have to upgrade your pc, you will have to one day, just as you will have to buy a new console.
Post
#261115
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
so many things to talk about in this thread....
i will do them one by one because there are so many things ive wanted to discuss lately and this is definatly the time to do it.

first off let me point out that there are some people in this thread that are so biased towards one manufacturer its sad.
whether your a sony, microsoft or nintendo fan, its pathetic to try and see someone back up their system by putting down the flaws of another.

my point here is that EVERY!! system has their flaws. i wont go into them but its a proven fact that no system launches without problems.
especially as the technology gets better and companies get more greedy. they want to release their system faster and therefore overlook certain things.
example here, shortages. each console had a shortage at their release. i dont care if one had it worse off than the other because so far people are still having a damn hard time getting their hands on a Wii which is supposed to have the best launch of the 3.

the point here is that no console is better than the other. anyone who says that is a ignorant fanboy. each system has their pros and cons and no one can say different. saying that i would like to point out a couple corrections made by people in this thread..

1) for the person who was talking about grand turismo costing money... false. sony has since abandoned that idea. they as well as everyone else realized it wouldn't fly and has since cancelled GT:HD and are putting all their work into GT 5. it was a stupid idea to begin with and a very similar situation happened during the ps2 version of GT 3. so before people continue to try and put sony down, this is false.

2) that entire article about Sony being a technological dissapointment is accurate in some cases but is definatly jumping on the hate sony bandwagon. they mention the DS outselling the PSP and this is supposed to be disapointing how? the fact that sony even survived against nintendo is achievement enough. Nintendo has held the portable market for years and years. so because they're not beating a company who has had such a great record with handhelds that makes them a bad company. maybe its just me but that makes no sense at all. theres no way sony would ever beat nintendo in the handheld market.

i started to write a complete paragraph on all the shortcomings of this article but its a waste of time...
point is, this guy is nitpicking in most of the cases, excluding the rootkit (that was just plain bad news from the beginning) and battery recalls (and problems like these arise in many companys)

3) someone said pc gaming was dying. this is the biggest joke of a statement if i've ever seen one. but from coming from someone who may not play pc games its not a surprise. when you stick to a specific format you tend to lose grasp on anything outside of your own format. its happens with everyone. but if you look at a game like crysis for example. crysis has so far cost over 27 million dollars to develope. are you telling me that they're putting all this money into a dying format? they're not stupid, they want to make money. take a look at the majority of online games such as Counterstrike, Battlefield 2, or how bout MMORPG's like World of Warcraft or Everquest. World of Warcraft alone has over 7 million subscribers. Sims games are dominating the female market in games (which is impressive because more and more females are becoming gamers.) the fact of the matter is PC gaming is not dying and will never die. as long as games are made on computers they will always have a market.

4) and im not picking on darth chatlab here but he sums up my next point perfectly and i want to thank him for that.

Hm... I don't know what to tell you, Sage. I've enjoyed PC gaming, but anymore it's so hard to keep up with the technology curve that I really can't get into PC gaming anymore.

i agree with him 100%! more than 100% because this is my major gripe with games today. however there is a major flaw to his argument which many people fail to notice.
earlier he said.

I understand full well the Wii is nowhere near as powerful as the PS3, and I don't care. I played a PS3 at Wal-Mart and well, it was a PS2 game with better graphics. (Some NBA or NCAA Basketball game)

Graphics aren't what made me want a GC--Super Smash Bros Melee was. And online Smash Bros Brawl is ultimately what sold me on the Wii. (It's my email address for crying out loud.)


so if graphics aren't what made you a fan of certain games why do you feel the need to keep up with technology?
i hear people say this all the time. "PC's cost too much to maintain if you want to play games on them"

this is about the worst possible excuse in the world. if you dont want to play games with all the bells and whistles. guess what? you dont have to. you can still play a game on low graphics or medium graphics and get the same amount of enjoyment out of it. will better graphics give you a better experience. in some cases yes, probably (depending on who you are i suppose.) but there is no rule that says you must upgrade. that is just a pissing competition between pc gamers which has been around forever. just as it is with the ps3 and xbox 360. fans of the two will be bitching at eachother for years trying to one up the other. and its so old.

the point im making in this regard is that gaming computers are not expensive. they are only expensive if you want them to be.
you could pick up a video card today for about the same amount of money as an xbox 360 and be able to play games that look just as good as the xbox. if a game comes out in a couple years, you can still play it on medium or low settings and have it look like the xbox 360 or (if your a graphics whore) you can spend more money to play a game that will look better than the xbox 360. the whole point is the pc has never been more expensive than a console. if anything its been cheaper.

but who cares at the end of the day?
we all have our favorite games and genres... and rather than bitching about which is better we should just be happy with what we have.

today the game market has been taking a downward trend with graphics first and gameplay second. unfortunatly some gamers out there believe this is the way of the future for games. me personally? i think its the downfall. you can make a game look a fuckin real as possible but i would still take a second rate game like The Legend of Zelda (gold cartridge) over it anyday. in fact i would go as far as saying, if i were allowed 1 game for the rest of my life it would be that. Keep your FEAR and Farcrys and Doom3's away from me. without gameplay a nice looking game is just a movie. Gameplay is what companys should be focusing on, and graphics should take the backseat. i have all the time in the world to watch games get pretty. no need to rush it.

wow my fingers are sore. thanks to those who read my rant.
please try not to quote it.
Post
#260643
Topic
Do you have a gun?
Time
Originally posted by: bad_karma24
Being a WWII reenactor, I currently own an M1 Garand, which IMO is one of the best rifles on the market as far as durability, shooting power, etc go. Very good one rifle all around. Here's a picture of it (and me as well):

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y267/badkarma24/4b4ed2dc.jpg


OMG!
you are one of the luckiest people alive.

i've always wanted an M1 Garand, not even so much for shooting. But just for display.

You wouldnt happen to know of any place to get them do you?
Post
#260440
Topic
hot.like.C3PX thread
Time
Originally posted by: Hot.like.fire
haha you guys make my day. lol i guess it's hard to detect sarcasm from posts on the internet....

wow C3PX i'm pretty jealous, you're looking really HOT in that picture. in fact i'm now green with envy because i've realized the sole purpose of this thread is to take away the attention of my thread with your arosing photos.... you BITCH.


hotlikefire... you could post everything from massive amounts of pornography all the way to the meaning of life in your thread and no one would care.

but i know all girls your age need attention sometimes, so you keep at it sport!
Post
#260439
Topic
hot like fire thread
Time
this topic does interest me.

it interests me how you find it relevant to post your daily happenings thinking you have the interest of thousands.
plus you should be happy if anything im keeping this dead topic alive.

otherwise you would be in here talking to yourself about how much your like paris hilton.

I wouldnt want that to happen now.
so im not going anywhere.
Post
#260082
Topic
The $$$ spent on the war on terror
Time
Originally posted by: JediSage
Originally posted by: theredbaron
Better still, that money could have been used to eliminate world poverty. The U.S. annual military expenditure is $3 trillion. Why not use that money to eliminate the conditions that produce terrorists: like poverty, despondancy, hunger, disease, and revenge?

If America was an unequivocally benevolent superpower in this world, any terrorists that remained would have no leg to stand on - they would be evil beyond a shadow of a doubt.


Yeah, 'cause everyone knows poverty will go away if you just throw money at it and have rock concerts (sell those t-shirts!).


no it wont. but neither will spending billions of dollars on a war which is making certain areas more worse of and poor than they already were.
and we're not talking about throwing money in the literal sense as you are making it seem. i guarantee that if any non profit organization were given that money to spend on a village in need of a new school or hospital or medical supplies, there would be a huge amount of volunteers to help build it.

ya it may not make that village the best place to live in the world but its at least making them better off. perhaps allowing them to seek medical treatment. or recieve an education. things we take for granted.

but your logic is right. throwing money into killing people is better than throwing money into saving people.
Post
#260020
Topic
The $$$ spent on the war on terror
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
I sense this is going to become a liberal wank thread. Count me out.


setting aside the whole liberal/conservative/democrat or whatever else Americans catagorize their governments.

Your telling me that this money was well spent?

anyone who thinks it was is a complete idiot.
I don't care if you support Bush or not. Anyone (meaning anybody in the entire world or throughout history) who would make this sort of a commitment into something that was never going to succeed in the first place is completely incapable of running a country.
Post
#259914
Topic
hot.like.C3PX thread
Time
i feel like a celebrity because you guys talk about me 24/7. in fact one could almost compare me to paris hilton they way you guys go off.



hotlikefire must be an idiot and as a result go to the worst university ever if she thinks we talk about her 24/7.
there's a distint difference between talking about and making fun of someone. but clearly she's too vain or too stupid to see that.

ya i guess if you want to be compared to paris hilton thats fine by me. just more stuff to work with i guess.
so how are those STD's coming there paris? trying to hide them behind that talent you dont have? wait you did sell a sex tape to millions, so that must account for some kind of talent.

yes hotlikefire, you should definatly strive to be paris hilton. at least that way you'll achieve something more in life than you are right now.