- Post
- #1564895
- Topic
- 'Kiki's Delivery Service' - DJMasturbeats version (1998 Disney English dub) (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1564895/action/topic#1564895
- Time
Swm iso KDS original English dubs synced! Halp! š
Swm iso KDS original English dubs synced! Halp! š
Hello sent a PM. Would love to scope this out š§
Mr Jones I sent you a pm about a week ago, I hope you receive it! š
Yes I hope BuccoBruce can return soon. In the past it would have taken me a week to download this so I didnāt ask for a link before. His project really sounds like an ideal multilingual preservation of all the best audio sources. Even without the video portion it would be great to have an archive of all the unique mixes that arenāt screwed up in mastering or authoring etc. Although more modern crappy mixes deserve to be preserved too, even if theyāre on currently available media. Because one day they wonāt be.
Look at [listen to] Dirty Harry, where the mono audio is just panned all around for the stereo mix. Maybe thereās a good copy of the mono or a tasteful modern surround mix, but all those shitty mixes should be preserved for posterity (infamy?) as well.
Anyway Akira especially seems to have such a crazy history of being remixed on almost every edition just like the OT. And many of those mixes (i.e. the original hypersonic mix in 24 bit) not available internationally. Not to mention all the obscure dubs people may be interested in, etc etc.
Didnāt know there are like 5 different subtitle translations but itās not surprising. For example are there many languages where Star Wars (1977) has so many translations?
Anyway, BuccoBruce, come back soon! š
Is the French version dubbed? (are there other language dubs?) Maybe it could be used to make an alternate audio where the characters speaking French actually do (or German, Spanish, Russian, etc )
I thought it was a bold move for the pilot episode to include so much Spanish, but that concept was soon abandoned so everyone speaks English in stilted accents.
Ive seen about half this show from the old Indy reconstructions now, which seems like a better way to watch it. I suppose putting them in chronological order could also be an option. The bookends tend to be terribly silly but charming and add necessary context. The edits frequently have repeated or anachronistic credits. A couple episodes had some audio sync issues and one even had an illegible pop up flashing during the last minute or so. Otherwise pretty cool itās all complete.
Ok I watched D+77 with this mix, flipping back to all the other mixes now and again to compare, and this really takes the cake. I imagine with the reconstruction of the movie in the mid 90s, as many best-generation audio sources were resynced for the new mix. The music particularly sounds much much better. Everything has much more separation and really does bring me back to the theater of 1997 yet amazing to hear with the original cut of the film like it should have been all along. Some of itās kind of weird like in the cantina the alien voices are quite prominent, and when the Falcon comes out of hyperspace at Alderaan the debris field makes those horrible synth swishes which, correct me if Iām wrong, only started with the 1993 mix from what I can tell. I wish they werenāt there.
Overall itās much more dynamic, with a lot of aural separation between the various sounds that wasnāt there before. The balance is much more modern sounding though so maybe not for purists but yes for when you show to your kids or family so theyāre not put off by āold timeyā sound. I swear it all sounded like the same edits to me, with all the same sonic character, but everything is much clearer. (Maybe a touch too much low end.) If there is the one frame sync problem at the tail end of the movie I really couldnāt tell.
Kudos Hal.
How is this coming along? Still curious for maybe a preview scene or a medley of shots from different movies.
Hello there,
I found the Google drive link on Reddit but the folder is now invalid. Is there anywhere to grab these 97 audio mixes? Asking here rather than pm since Iām sure other inquiring minds (and ears) want to know. If this is not a good place please pm. Thanks
Hey guys,
I have like 25 or so carded Kenner figs that I havenāt dug up in decades but am going to inventory soon. Can anybody recommend the best way to evaluate ($$) them and recommend storage. Once I get them out I plan on merely slipping them into comic book bags if itās not too snug a fit, but theres got to be safer solutions. Right now the figs are in a big sturdy chest, which has been locked with a long-lost keyā¦
From what I recall there are a few Yodas, Hoth Luke, probably Dagobah Luke, some Baradas, Darth Vader, X-Wing Luke, and a jawa. Some Han Solos of various persuasions and more. The figs are all Esb, Rotj, and POTF so none with just Star Wars on the card. Surely all of them have got price stickers stuck on them. Who knows if they have turned all yellow over the years.
Looking at eBay sold listings hasnāt been fruitful because the 90s POTF and the āVintage Collectionā make search optimization practically impossible. Is there some sort of price guide for these babies? Or shall I just open them and play with them? š
Chicks dig the car!
This is a great idea, canāt wait to check it out.
Doing discs of movies/shows already on streaming is not at all the same as them putting out the unaltered OT. I would sing the praises of Droids & Ewoks on Blu-ray however.
Personally Iād love the highest quality version of the holiday special possible [is the cartoon scanned from film on d+? Havenāt watched it there] but there is a hq tape copy thatās available, and the master might not be much better.
Didnāt the 4k77 guys have a film of this they scanned and made available? (And films of some other classic docs as well?)
From what I gathered elsewhere, the WB scans used for the DVD appeared in HD on the now-defunct DC Universe service. They are presumably available somewhere out there, and I saw at least one unofficial Blu-ray for sale.
Supposedly clips from these are shown in the Blu Ray documentary rather than the newer scans.
āDamon Lindelof Says He Was āAsked to Leaveā His Star Wars Projectā:
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/movies/a43728671/damon-lindelof-star-wars
Ā
Thank God someone is on topic
[Damon Lindelof said:]
or again again try, as Yoda would say.
Yoda would never ever say that š
A New Hope was shot in Technicolor ⦠Technicolor is/was notoriously beautiful after all.
Can you guys imagine if Star Wars was actually filmed with Technicolor cameras like the Wizard of Oz? What a trip that would be.
There was a time before Kodak when all color was Technicolor. Even films shot on Kodak had Technicolor prints, dwindling to an occasional thing as color film improved, yet the practice persisted til the early 21st century. To be honest Iām not even sure if I ever saw a dye print in the 80s/90s. Sorry this is going off topic.
But I didnāt know 4k83 was from a 2nd gen copy⦠so the point of an interposotive is to have better control of colors, and then the internegs and release positives donāt need color correction? I guess the 4k83 print is basically the same as an interpositive? For exhibition Iāve only heard of that for 70mm blowups but not straight 35mm copies. There must be a greater discussion of this print somewhereāin this thread or the other forum?
Supposedly these shorts are in the public domain so WB hasnāt been interested in releasing them in HD, until the forthcoming Blu-ray next month. But there are many gray market releases of these cartoons on DVD, from who knows what sources. These versions are freely available on YouTube etc. WB themselves put out SD versions as bonus features on the Superman The Movie bluray.
Are there any unofficial HD scans from film prints or just weird DVDs?
Was the shoe erased in cleanup? Or were the Battle scenes recomposited at some point and the shoe omitted?
Marvel movies are awesome and each one is not only unique and different, but enjoyable by people with adult sensibilities. Star Wars has never been better than under Disney, with each film being better than the last. Disney themselves canāt stop innovating with groundbreaking features. American culture has never been so original or relevant!
It sounds amazing, can I get a link please?
So Snow White was restored by Lowrwy āin 4kā in 1994. I imagine a great deal of work was undertaken to copy the original negative into a new three strip negative, a color negative, and/or a digital environment. Did Disney reuse that work as basis for the subsequent releases, either the same digital files or new scans of the 1994 copies? (In that case might this new 4k be Disneyās first use of Snow Whiteās original negative since 1994?)
Now Iām not sure why Cinderella 4k wouldnāt have the original audio mix, unless Disney found really high quality music masters to drop in, like what they did for Sleeping Beauty bluray. I doubt anything like that exists for Snow White though and donāt really want to hear someone try to make an Atmos mix from the original mono mix. š
Yes I could be wrong but I thought that one or more movies were re-rendered for fullscreen with characters repositioned accordingly to suit the framing, not just the camera reframed in general. If itās true then Iām sure it varies by shot with the minimum amount of work possible. Feel free to post any caps.
Edit. Also in this vein, were any releases actually done from film prints or were they all done from master digital files to NTSC? If they can put it on film they can put it on video, I donāt see why theyād use the in-between.
Okay, the only one officially confirmed by Pixar themselves where they reposition objects or characters to fit the screen was for the 4:3 versions is for Bugs Life (optional on the 2003 2-Disc DVD). On Disc 2 for the 2003 DVD, they made a bonus feature about it and compared it next to the Theatrical widescreen version. The only other movie where Iāve noticed repositioning is for Cars but only for like the opening like for the front graphic effects like when theyāre showing clips of the characters alongside the race and that news scene where McQueen is missing. Otherwise, I havenāt seen any repositioning for any of the other Pixar movies.
Also, to answer your other question, all of these 4x3 releases on DVD are from the digital files, not film reels. If we were talking in general though, the only one that wasnāt from the digital files was Toy Story for the original 1996 VHS release, instead based off a film element for itās source.
A+ answer š
Looks like this project has a bit of history. Personally Iād love the best possible open matte version. (Last seen on DVD?) There are too many shots where the framing is composed for 1.33 to say that 1.85, 1.78, or even 1.66 is appropriate. Kubrick obviously intended this movie to have a future outside the theater, i.e. on 4x3 home televisions.
Anecdotally this is because he saw 2001 on TV once and was dismayed how it was horribly cropped. āIāll make my new movies with future-proof tv format in mind,ā he said to himself. I have no idea how I remember this tidbit and it could be entirely false, but it would make sense.
Am I misremembering or are there unique 4:3 and 16:9 versions of some Pixar movies?
Iām not sure what you mean by unique specifically, but Iāve noticed with many Pixar movies from 1998-2006 (with the exception of The Incredibles), the 4:3 versions only on DVD would be reframed to be closer to the left or right, show more of the top and bottom image, pan and scan here and there, etc. Took some screenshots of the Fullscreen version to the 2001 (reprint of 2000) DVD to Toy Story 2 to compare it to the normal widescreen version for comparison if youād like to see.
Yes I could be wrong but I thought that one or more movies were re-rendered for fullscreen with characters repositioned accordingly to suit the framing, not just the camera reframed in general. If itās true then Iām sure it varies by shot with the minimum amount of work possible. Feel free to post any caps.
Edit. Also in this vein, were any releases actually done from film prints or were they all done from master digital files to NTSC? If they can put it on film they can put it on video, I donāt see why theyād use the in-between.
Am I misremembering or are there unique 4:3 and 16:9 versions of some Pixar movies?
If Vader was Lukeās father in 1978, was he Anakin at that point? The whole āObi Wan never told you⦠Etc⦠I am your fatherā does not entirely preclude the possibility that he, as a separate guy named Darth, sired Luke with Mrs. Skywalker.