logo Sign In

DocLathropBrown

User Group
Members
Join date
27-Sep-2005
Last activity
22-Nov-2011
Posts
37

Post History

Post
#371756
Topic
Thread I saw on IMDb: When did you realize Palpatine's true identity? (in the PT)
Time

Heh. Mine was a little different. TPM came out when I was 12. My parents didn't care for ESB or ROTJ, so I'd only seen them sparingly, since I wasn't a lucky kid with his own TV, so if they parents didn't want to see them, I had no control over the situation, so as a kid, I didn't get to see ESB or ROTJ much!

So I was unfamiliar with the Emperor's surname. All I remembered of him was his title of "Emperor." So when it came to TPM, I recognized Darth Sideous as the eventual Emperor.... but not that Palpatine was Sideous. Had I been familiar with the character's name of "Palpatine" from ROTJ, I would have made the connection right away, but I was just unobservant enough to be fooled by a cloak over the top half of his face and a voice change!

Post
#354683
Topic
Hypothetical
Time

If George indeed released the OOT on Blu-ray, cleaned up correctly with loving restoration, and then released a six film boxed set where the OT was the SE... Hell yes I'd buy it.

The SE is a fun alternate version. My only problems with it were when it was going to replace the OOT. Consumers should have the right to enjoy the version they prefer in the highest quality possible. For any film, not just Star Wars. As far as I'm concerned, if a director signs off on the theatrical cut, that's a finished film. If it's not finished... don't release it!

Alternate or special edition versions are fun and most of the time, I prefer them to the theatrical (See Superman, Terminator 2), but I think it's important to provide fans of the original cuts with the option of enjoying the version they prefer.

The Blade Runner final cut disc from last year is the definition of what to give the fans. It has ALL 5 cuts of the film, and although I am not a fan of the film, I can only sing Scott's praises for doing what George should with SW.

Post
#341867
Topic
Star Wars and Indiana Jones on Blu-Ray Discussion
Time

Permeating the consciousness of your average joe as the two versions coming together as standard is good.

It's not like it will guarantee a proper restoration down the line, but it looks like another step up the ladder. He keeps claming the releases are "a limited time only" but we now see it isn't the case. I see it as Lucas starting to loosen his grip on sticking to "The SEs are the only versions!"

I'll tell you one thing, if the OOT was to get properly restored, it would be well within Lucas' ego-preservation to make it low-key. And he'd change his story to cover the period where he considered them "gone."

As I said: if.

Post
#341741
Topic
Star Wars and Indiana Jones on Blu-Ray Discussion
Time

I find that to be another potentential step up. Looks like the original versions of the films are going to be a standard inclusion from now on. I mean, two releases with the same "bonus feature?" Maybe. But three now? And pimping out the fact that it includes both versions right on the front? As if they're seen as more equals, y'know, like a normal DVD release that pimps out having multiple versions of the same film in the set?

After reading "The Secret History of Star Wars," I have a different perspective on Georgie. I'm not happy about how he treats the OOT, but I kind of get the feeling now that he felt kind of hurt at how ill-recieved his prefurred versions of the films were, and as a side effect, he feels so insecure about them (because on the inside, maybe he knows we're all right) that he's hesitant to treat the OOT with the respect it deserves. Rather sad, really, that he can't see the value in them that we do.

Truly, SHOSW told me so much more about Lucas than I ever knew. Found out I've got a lot in common with him, and it really humanized him for me after seeing how much the internet villifies him. I suggest everyone read it, as it sheds a lot of light into what makes Lucas tick, it's that exhaustive.

Of course, what do I know? I loved KOTCS and although I don't really care for the PT, I don't loathe them. Now where's SkyJedi with another anti-Lucas rant?

Post
#327742
Topic
Yet ANOTHER DVD boxed set...*sigh*
Time
Gaffer Tape said:

I understand the desire for a new OOT transfer... a high-class one. But it seems too many people are clamoring for differences in these prequel releases, particularly for that new CG Yoda in TPM. I know I've mentioned this before over the years, but, despite the hatred directed at that TPM puppet, isn't begging for him to be changed the very antithesis of what we're about? It seems hypocritical and wishy washy of us to complain about more and more changes to the OT and lack of respect given to the theatrical versions when we're constantly hoping for changes to the prequels.

Besides, the first DVD already added in enough shitty, unnecessary material that wasn't in the theatrical version. Lucas even admits this on the commentary when the boring, extended shots of the podrace are happening: "Well, when we cut the movie together, I realized that these didn't really flow well with the movie. But now that we have this DVD, I decided to put them back in." Yeah, he actually said that...

Ah, but see...

1. It's a prequel. It sucks already, more CG can't hurt.

2. A puppet for Yoda in 1999 wasn't up to the special effects standards of the time. I think it's fair to replace it. Whereas the OT were up to the effects standards of the time, Yoda in TPM was not.

Post
#327607
Topic
Yet ANOTHER DVD boxed set...*sigh*
Time
Gaffer Tape said:

To ESHBG and Doc, yeah, I thought about that too.  It would seem very much like Lucas to try to bury news about an OOT release in order to sabotage it.  But once again, think about the GOUT.  I know occasionally they tried to pass off as the big selling point the fact that they were individually released, but all kinds of ads pointed to the fact that they were being released with the theatrical versions.  So whatever George's exact feelings on a release of the OOT is, it didn't keep LFL's mouth shut back in 2006, so I really don't believe we can expect that this time around either.  If there was a big, new transfer of the OOT, we would have heard about it by now.

 

True, and Lucas wouldn't do it quietly to avoid looking like a hypocrite ("Oh, hey, turns out the last release wasn't the best quality! We just 'unearthed' original prints!"), because as we've seen in the past, he has no compulsion about putting his foot in his mouth for all to see.

Post
#327433
Topic
Yet ANOTHER DVD boxed set...*sigh*
Time
see you auntie said:

The biggest kick to my nuts with this release would be if Lucasfilm includes the '06 GOUT the only difference being an anamorphic transfer. Because then technically that would be a step up from the current set I own yet if I chose to buy it I'd be giving them more cash and having to buy the same SE's again that I don't want. But I don't think I'll be faced with that dilemma anyway.

 

 

I would literally laugh out loud if this happened.

But hey, the visual quality of the GOUT was good enough that I'd be happy at the DVD level if it was anamorphic, as that would remove the jaggies. But not for a Blu-ray transfer.

Post
#327401
Topic
Yet ANOTHER DVD boxed set...*sigh*
Time

I know the odds aren't good. But I'm still hoping against hope that this release will have the theatrical versions, at LEAST.

Think about it, if the theatrical cuts are included on this release, even if it's exactly the same as the 2006 discs, it's a sign that Lucas is ready to stop ignoring the OOT's existance. The fact that the OT discs are so mysterious as to their extra content gives me hope. Because it doesn't explicitly deny the possibility.

All I want is an anamorphic and restored OOT, and my problems with Lucas will evaporate. I like the prequels for their moments and some of the SE additions, I do like. But I cannot endorse them until the OOT gets near-or-equal treatment along with the PT and the SEs. The OOT doesn't have to be as cleaned up as the 04 SEs, I wouldn't want that. But I want anamorphic picture and a restoration equal to that of any good, modern DVD transfer.

He already proved he's willing to release them. The next step up won't hurt him one damn bit. I really hope he's decided to learn from what Ridley Scott did with Blade Runner most recently. Please all parties; include all cuts of the films.

Post
#251167
Topic
Lucas on Colbert
Time
Even with the weird things he does.... even with the mediocre prequels... Lucas is still one Hell of a guy. I want him to release a restored OOT, but I definitely don't hate the man. The fact that he threw a bone to the Prequel haters and even made a point of poking fun at Jar Jar, USING Jar Jar.... that just shows there's "Still good left in him."

Great segment. I hate Stephen Colbert, but I loved this episode. Even after everything that's happened.... I think Lucas is a cool guy.
Post
#250032
Topic
Favorite Star Wars Movie
Time
Hey, I thought Liam Neeson was one of the better parts of TPM.

I voted for ESB, almost voted for "A New Hope." As far as I'm concerned, he didn't touch the movie but to add the E4 title, therefore, calling it ANH is just as valid.

I really did enjoy ROTS, though. That's about tied for me, but ESB easily wins out because it has Han Solo, and the Lightsaber battle at the end of it carries even more weight, due to Luke being an underdog. Whereas, the final fights in ROTS, Yoda/Emperor and Obi Wan/Anakin are evenly matched.

Probably my favorite part of the Lightsaber fight in ESB is after the group gets away in the Falcon and Luke's is taken by surprise by Vader, and Vader just cuts loose and really goes at him. The look on Luke's face when Vader tells him "You are beaten.... it is useless to resist" really tells us that he's emotionally and phyiscally exhausted. The circles under his eyes..... he looks totally worn out.
Post
#248956
Topic
For Those who bought the Sept. 12th Release, Thoughts so far?
Time
I love them, and I hadn't realized just how much better the films were without the changes. I could live with them before, but now nearly all of them, save the SE Battle of Yavin and the Cloud City stuff, I can no longer stand. FX cleanup notwithstanding.

Now, who wants to start campaigning for a remastered/anamorphic OOT with FX cleanup?
Post
#248553
Topic
I Love Dark Horse
Time
You guys should see the issue of "Star Wars Tales" where Greedo's family takes Han to court for killing him, and they totally and COMPLETELY poke fun at the Greedo shooting first thing. Han's lawyer brings up the point that he fired, Han was defending himself, and Greedo's estate complains that Han was never in danger becasue Greedo is such a poor shot.

In the end, the court rules in favor of Greedo's family and Han is sentanced to death for shooting a poor Rodian with no aim.
Post
#247679
Topic
First Impressions of the OOT ...
Time
Well, you know what, I caved and bought Star Wars yesterday and putting it on.... YOWSA!

You know, I don't have a widescreen TV, so the lack of anamorphic enhancement, although it means lower resolution, I can deal with it for the time being. And all I have to say is that despite the aliasing and the minor edge enhancement and the grain.... I wouldn't have it any other way. Sure, I like the PT and the SEs, but I don't think I'll be going back to the SEs unless I have some sort of six-film marathon. Without so much distracting CGI and the incorrect color (I HATE that!), I was pulled back "into" Star Wars for the first time in I don't know HOW long.

When I get the cash, I will certainly be picking up ESB and ROTJ. ESB, mostly because of the correctly colored lightsabers... the borderline pink saber nearly ruins the Cloud City fight for me. ROTJ.... I cannot stand "Jedi Rocks" and although I can live with Hayden, it's his performance in the scene itself that bugs me. He doesn't look inviting at all, and once again, the murky, ugly Lightsabers are too much, I can't focus on the fight because of it.

So sue me, I even like the grain. A small wash to remove some of it would be nice, but I'd like some grain left in. I totally understand what people mean when they say it adds charm... it totally does.

The only things I'll miss from the SEs are the digital recompositing and most of the SE Death Star stuff for the Battle of Yavin.
Post
#245798
Topic
"BUT ANAMORPHIC ENHANCEMENT ALTERS THE MOVIES!!!"
Time
Yeah, Cable, you went over the top.

Maybe he's lying, maybe he's NOT. Did you ever think that maybe, just maybe that for once it may not be a plant from TFN or something? That maybe not everything can be too good to be true?

Like I said, what he said makes sense, and if he's lying, he's obviously putting in more work than a moron from TFN would in crafting them, because his claims sound reasonable and within the realm of believeability.
Post
#245744
Topic
"BUT ANAMORPHIC ENHANCEMENT ALTERS THE MOVIES!!!"
Time
If the '07 set is supposed to sort of an "archival" set, I could see Lucas giving the OOT a proper treatment, maybe even coming standard with the new cuts as a seamless-branching easter egg on all future releases of the OT (like the SE/Theatrical cuts of Terminator 2).

It makes a little bit of sense, so I'll give Raul the benefit of the doubt for now. Given the fact that the OOT came out this year and next year's the 30 anniversary, I see potential for him to be telling the truth.
Post
#236607
Topic
LOL Look at How They Try to Explain Away Continuity Problems!
Time
I never, for one second, thought that Lucas had the entire saga written from the beginning. As far as I will believe, he had the rough outline, no specifics. Luke and Leia were the kids of Anakin Skywalker and Anakin fell to the dark side in the times of the Old Republic and Obi-Wan trained him.

That's all I'll ever believe he had written about the PT.
Post
#234821
Topic
The definitive list: changes you can and can't stand...
Time
Let me make it plain that, first, I grew up with the originals as well. Not a child of the 80's, but I was watching the trilogy long before the SE. I did most of my growing up prior to 1997 anyway. And hopefully you people won't have me banned, but I adore the prequels. Not because they're (supposedly) better as the OT, not even because they're even as-good as the OT (Hell, even the SE-OT is better on its worst moments than the PT), but because they're fun, they're backstory, and maybe I'm more tolerant than other fans. For me, it was never a competition. The PT didn't have to be better than the OT. And if they aren't, I'm not going to curse Lucas' name.

And though I don't need the OOT or will even particularly prefur them over the SE-OT, I do agree that the OOT must be released onto DVD in respectable form. The SE-OT is, for all intents and purposes, a trilogy of remakes. It would be simply ludicris to release the 1999 version of The Haunting and disreguard the existance of the original. And then let it be a substandard release after years? I'm sorry, no. Even IF the remake was as good as the original, you don't do that.

Even when the OOT gets released with good transfers and an anamorphic upgrade, I'll still stick to Lucas' newer vision for watching the saga. I'll be more than happy to own the OOT, though.

Which brings me to my larger point. I want each person here to detail their definitive (as of the '04 set....) list of the changes/additions to the OT that they both can and cannot stand, or even like, as the case may be.

Star Wars

I haven't got a problem with most of the changes. A few are even an improvement, I feel. The biggest problem I have, though, is CGI trying to fit into 30 year old footage. It's completely rediculous. Like the Jabba scene. Even though it's repetative, I could stand it if Jabba looked convincing. He doesn't. I'm sorry, George. Try again next release! The Dewback in the background as the heroes enter the cantina? It's CG now. I'd be able to live with that, but the damn thing MAKES NOISE. Way to be subtle, there, George. Draw our eyes RIGHT to the big fake thing.

Overblown. That describes most of the changes to ANH. The comedy, such as the Jawa falling off the Ronto (spare me!) and the droids fighting at the start of the new Mos Eisley establishing shot, are totally unecessary (as are 99% of ANH's changes) and, frankly, lame. The CG stuff on the Tatooine sections stick out like a sore thumb, and all I think were good/needed changes are the fixing of the (vaseline) underside for the Landspeeder and the new low-shot of the Landspeeder from behind (as they heard toward Eisley, just after the "wretched hive" scene). Also the new shot of the Sandcrawler coming over a ridge on the way to the Lars homestead was a much-welcomed change.

I can tolerate Greedo shooting first. Not that it isn't stupid, mind you. But I can't accept it at this time because it is so unbelievably bad, effects-wise.

The only other worthy change in ANH was the new Death Star battle stuff. Here we go, some CG that ISN'T obvious. Watching the original Battle of Yavin now, it's so slow and unbearable. Though it's practically a big slap in the face to the hard work of ILM from back in the day. Unfortunately, some shots in the trench still look fake-ish and motion controlly.

The Empire Strikes Back

I don't have a problem with any of these changes, actually. They're few-and-far between. Necessary? None of it was. Wait, I take my statement back. Re-using the landing shot from ROTJ for Vader landing on the Executor was lame as hell.

My only other problem with the film lies in Lowry's shitty remastering job for the DVD: Vader's pink saber. It helps take away from the kick ass Luke/Vader fight.

Return of the Jedi

I have to comment about the DVD restoration that made my jaw drop: the fixing of the matte lines around the Rancor. A very welcomed fix!

Okay, the Sarlacc.... why did it have to be so in-our-face? It would be more tolerable if it didn't make any noise but, alas....

Once again, Vader's pink saber... why, Lowry.... why? And this time, it's murky!

Oh wait, let's step back for a little bit.... "Jedi Rocks"? Good f-ing God. I have to skip this EVERY time. The only time I've been embarrassed to be watching a Star Wars film! And what was wrong with the original song? That song was kick ass!

Okay, now the Ewok celebration... the only thing I can't stand about it is the new song. It doesn't mesh with the beginning of the end credits, whereas the original Williams piece flowed right into the big Star Wars theme blast that opens the end credits!

Christiansan as the force ghost? Dumb, and a big slap in the face of Sebastian Shaw. But I can let it go.


...Okay, your guys' turn...