logo Sign In

Discostu

User Group
Members
Join date
28-Aug-2014
Last activity
29-Oct-2024
Posts
101

Post History

Post
#936888
Topic
Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)
Time

CatBus said:

Reasons against: subtitle file proliferation (which leads to overwhelmed/confused people), and at least in the case of German matching subs, lack of a theatrical reference for Star Wars, which I also use for the matching style in Empire. I’d hate to make matching subtitles that don’t actually match once a reference is found.

I understand that and I would be perfectly happy if there were only native, no matching subtitles.

Also, the German version is typically watched with the German dub, and I make no promises that my subs match dubs.

Sure, they are not for the hearing impaired but for people who like to watch original version with subtitles instead of dubs (yes, they also exist in Germany 😃 )

Post
#934003
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

Finnius said:

@Williarob: I hope for the next release you cut back a bit on the Negative1 advertising. V1.0 seemed to have an excessively long ‘bumper’. It’s not that you shouldn’t be proud of your work and announce it before the film…it’s just that imo it seemed a bit too long timewise. Maybe 30 secs instead of 40. Maybe I just can read fast…lol

If it is supposed to be GOUT synced like he sais, there shouldn’t be a (front) bumper at all.

Post
#933166
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time

Darth Lucas said:

Discostu said:

@towne32: No, that is not what I meant. The general vibe I was getting from the last comments was that it is OK to change special effects as long as only the 35mm sources are used to do it. Seems like I misunderstood your comment.

https://vimeo.com/117582796

This is what he was referring to.

Thanks for that link. Seems like his approach has changed quite much in the meantime, I only knew his website. His comments in the video suggest that he might be correcting some things that were already present on the negative, but as long as these changes are only about dirt, flickering or poor registration, I can live with that. The result is certainly impressive.

I will now have a look at his other videos and hope that these will support my now more positive view on his work.

Post
#932845
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time

yotsuya said:

Mike isn’t trying to create a faithful duplicate of the original. He is trying to restore the best picture that he can from the sources he has. He is basically doing what Lucas should have done in 97. He is trying to achieve a 4k quality image and doing so from a 70’s print that wasn’t intended for such high definition viewing requires that he address things most of us can’t even see because they would show up as noticeable flaws ar 4k.

The movie was shot and screened in 35mm but intended to be seen at a lower resolution?

Post
#932800
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time

Wazzles said:

Discostu said:

Is this really a restoration when special effects are enhanced with techniques like rotoscoping?

No, it’s an actual restoration.

I’m not sure if I understand your answer correctly but the website is full of examples where rotoscoping , cloning and other techniques are used for effects enhancement. That’s not restoration but manipulation

Post
#932200
Topic
Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)
Time

mapet318 said:

Discostu said:

I hope not, dubtitles are devil’s work.

Why is that? I’m terrible at understanding spoken Spanish so having both a dub and subtitles helps a ton.

Sure, and you will get that when watching Spanish movies with Spanish subtitles. But subtitles that translate into a different language should be as accurate as possible and not recreate inaccuracies of the dubbing that result from factors like lipsyncing.