logo Sign In

BigMcLargeHuge

User Group
Members
Join date
5-Jun-2017
Last activity
19-Jan-2018
Posts
28

Post History

Post
#1086748
Topic
Han - Solo Movie ** Spoilers **
Time

TV’s Frink said:

I will never understand the attitude that a new movie can ruin an older movie. I will see this once, and if it sucks, I’ll never see it again, and it won’t affect my opinion of the OT or TFA one bit.

Frink, is there a post someplace on this site where you “defend” TFA? I’d genuinely love to read that. Because whereas I enjoyed TFA, I didn’t and don’t need it. And it is only kinda half in my head-canon for what “counts” at the end of the day. The Last Jedi is going to bump it either all the way in or all the way out. I refuse to see any of these Anthology things going forward. RO was a piece of garbage.

Post
#1084929
Topic
What is your Star Wars?
Time

joefavs said:

I think it would have to be the Faces and 97 SE tapes, the Power of the Force action figures, the Dark Forces II: Jedi Knight and Rogue Squadron video games, the Decipher Star Wars CCG cards, and whatever Bantam EU books I could snag at the grocery store. A very 90s Star Wars.

Pretty much me too! Twas a totally 90s experience. (A part of me would almost pay a stupid amount of money for a set of those CCG cards for pure nostalgia’s sake alone.) Though I’d add on to my list the first Dark Forces game, the WEG RPG, and the old “Essential Guides” which my little brother and I read like quasi-religious texts…

And I’ll never ever forget the first time I sat and watched the OT at a sleepover at my buddy Jordan’s house on his dad’s “Faces” tapes. Wide-eyed and mesmerized.

Post
#1083356
Topic
Episode VIII : The Last Jedi - Discussion * <strong><em>SPOILER THREAD</em></strong> *
Time

Lord Haseo said:

Luke being the main protagonist didn’t stop Leia and Han from having a significant emotional impact in Empire…

Well, right, because Empire is a significantly better movie than Return of the Jedi. ROTJ is the weak link, sure, but it isn’t the dumpster fire this guy wants to make it out to be. We have three dumpster fires in the Star Wars canon and none of them involve Ewoks.

Post
#1083283
Topic
Episode VIII : The Last Jedi - Discussion * <strong><em>SPOILER THREAD</em></strong> *
Time

Lord Tobias said:

Lord Haseo said:

They were of no emotional significance though.

THIS

just because a character is doing something does not mean that they are significant to the emotional story of the film

You didn’t mention “the emotional story of the film”, you mentioned “making a difference” and plot-wise - they did.

Look, iS ROTJ a Eugene O’Neill play? No, it is not. Is it a fun space fantasy adventure with some silly and stupid bits? Yes.

Also, I’d say that Han and Leia DID have an emotional arc (their relationship) and Leia had a minor one with Luke too (them being sibs). Was any of this as big an emotional arc as Luke’s? No. But, then, Luke is the PROTAGONIST.

Post
#1083029
Topic
Episode VIII : The Last Jedi - Discussion * <strong><em>SPOILER THREAD</em></strong> *
Time

Lord Tobias said:

It was the movie that firmly established that jedi were the only characters who make any real difference…han and leia had zero stake or importance in the story and you can cut then out if you want…this trend of “jedi first, everyone last” infected star wars media to a ridiculous degree

Han and Leia (et al) took down the Death Star’s shields so that Lando and Wedge (also, non-Jedi…) could then blow up said Death Star which (even if Luke had totally failed) would have killed the Emperor…But, no, you’re right.

Post
#1082396
Topic
Han - Solo Movie ** Spoilers **
Time

Yeah, Frink, I think this is a taste thing more than a “this is objectively right or wrong” thing. But the way I see it, you could have removed Vader from the film entirely and had Tarkin fill both roles (Krennic’s boss and the guy who Krennic is trying to one-up) or the other way 'round. It was an unnecessary complication to my mind to have both of 'em - and no doubt done to appeal to the fanbase. (Just one man’s opinion.)