logo Sign In

What did the Prequel Trilogy need? — Page 12

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Nobody

The original Star Wars is a very classically and carefully structured piece of cinema, and it's definitely told from the droid's viewpoint. I think that ideal was much looser in the following two movies, so I'd say it's a stretch that the whole saga is from their point-of-view, but they're obviously a presence throughout.

Episode IV definitely shows it from their point of view to a greater extent. I agree with that. Although done more loosely in the next movies, it is still the baseline, no doubt.

Artoo and/or Threepio are always present or nearby with the heroes. I really liked how this carried on over to the Prequel Trilogy. What do you think of the irony of R2-D2 going with Anakin to Mustafar where he essentially becomes the mechanical Darth Vader we had all been waiting for?

Originally posted by: Nobody

But, regarding Anakin's involvement, it only makes sense to me that he might have built Artoo. It's not real science that matters here, it's movie logic. Although both robots are technically complex, it is because of Artoo's personality that he speaks much more highly of Anakin's abilities.

Artoo is unique and whoever did create him undoubtedly put special twists and turns in the little droid's programming. That is not really a matter of opinion, it is a matter of a fact. No other astromech stands out in the galaxy and story as much as Artoo.

But at the same time it was the protocol droid who knew all the languages, was cynical of everything and everyone, and stumbled into danger where he didn't mean to. That I think reflects Anakin's own personality a bit more. A cynical, well-intentioned, sometimes oblivious personality. Artoo and Anakin, while there are parallels, I simply don't see it to the extent that I do with Threepio and Anakin.

Originally posted by: Nobody

And that doesn't require taking the heroic repair job away from him. That scene was obviously contrived to introduce him, so it could simply be contrived at a different spot. A flock of robots driving out onto the hull to fix a severed wire is a little silly anyway. Imagine this instead: the ship is damaged, and either they have no droids, or none can fix it, and that's why they have to land. On Tatooine they meet Artoo, who comes with. NOW something goes wrong. They could be attacked again - could be Trade goons, or maybe Jabba discovered them and sent his own cronies (interesting chance to see another culture's space tech)- or maybe Obi-Wan is simply a lousy mechanic and his upgrades break. My vote is that Maul is after them, and Obi-wan didn't get the hyperdrive working right, and Anakin and Artoo work together to get it running in time - probably requiring Artoo's spacewalk. Makes them both look good.


I see so many people argue and fight about The Phantom Menace not contributing enough to the overall plot of the saga. Your version of the story how would've liked it, sounds almost like it is a side-story that wouldn't contribute, unless for instance you made Jabba a main villain ride beside Darth Maul. The reason for TPM being like it is with the escape from Naboo, was that they needed to pass through the blockade.

That blockade was initiated by the Trade Federation, which was being used like a pawn by Darth Sidious: that is a major role in his becoming Supreme Chancellor, because it creates doubt in the senate of the current Chancellor's collective wisdom.

Save for AOTC, there's very few useless moments. It's scenes like those, with the repairing of the Naboo cruiser that contribute to the overall picture. Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan needed to escape in order to ever end up meeting Anakin.

And while I can see your version as possibly adequate, if contributing to the whole saga as an entity, I think it was handled great as is. Seriously. If anything was well thought out in the aspect of small, seemingly useless scenes, it is the whole Naboo/Trade Federation/Darth Sidious arc. Before Revenge of the Sith I can't blame someone for saying it all was for nothing. But now we have all the proof and back-up that we need to say "Hey this actually does make sense from the overall picture of things."

Originally posted by: Nobody

And what about Threepio? He's easy. As a protocol droid, he fits nicely into any official hospitality capacity, of which there are plenty, since the prequels deal with so many politicians. It was nice meeting a counter-part of his right off the bat, and frankly, I was expecting to see many more. For instance, you know who could probably use such a droid in their employ, but was conspicuously missing one? Amidala. So, that's my answer: Threepio works for Amidala. Which means we meet him in Naboo, and he's been along with the main characters the whole time. Probably we first see him on the escape ship - it would make sense for him to be stationed there, since it's sortof Naboo's Air Force One. Again, the movie logic side of my brain really likes this idea, because it means one droid belongs to Anakin, and the other to Padme. Nice and symmetrical.


That thought never did occur to me. Wouldn't that be strange to watch Episode IV, the original Star Wars and go "Hey, Threepio belonged to Anakin and Artoo was a close favorite astromech droid of Padme!" And Luke first seeing the two droids together, not even knowing how closely linked they are to his origins!

Keep in mind I did switch that ownership around to the canon ownerships, because I simply can't bend my mind around your fixation with having Threepio working for Amidala. I mean I can start to imagine it, but then the whole storyline of the saga starts to unfocus, and I just don't think it could ever work out that way.

For one thing, Padme and Threepio simply wouldn't get along being around one another all the time like you want. There are friends/companions out there with very different personalities from one another, yes, but I can only imagine those two getting on one another's nerves. For an example of this, look at how Leia and Threepio get along in the Original Trilogy. Leia is a lot different from her mother Padme but they really have the same temperament!


Originally posted by: Nobody

You know, I'm sure you can find a way to explain any of his actions, but it didn't come across to me on the screen. It's not that he wasn't emotional enough, or the scene wasn't emotional enough - it's just the emotions seemed contrived... they seemed inconsistent. But I don't want to debate this subject much, because it could go on forever, and I think it's off-topic here.


Nobody, it might be getting a bit off-topic. But I might like to have an explanation of what you mean by inconsistent. Emotions of turmoil can't all be the same from day to day or Star Wars movie to Star Wars movie ....emotions are like a storm, and they are always going up and down. Especially with Anakin Skywalker.
Why hello there
Author
Time
Originally posted by: BeeJay
Nobody, it might be getting a bit off-topic. But I might like to have an explanation of what you mean by inconsistent. Emotions of turmoil can't all be the same from day to day or Star Wars movie to Star Wars movie ....emotions are like a storm, and they are always going up and down. Especially with Anakin Skywalker.
If I may, I think I feel the same way as Nobody on this one... er, in that I have the same opinion as the poster called Nobody, not... well, you know...

Xebeche... he who talk loud, say nothing...

Who are you travellin' with?

...Nobody!

Anyway...

It's that what we see and what we hear and what we know about his future are not consistent with each other, not that Anakin's emotional state should remain the same throughout. Anakin's responses seem inconsistent with his situation. I honestly feel that his responses to his surroundings and situations seem constantly at odds with who he is and who he will become.

The first example I would give is when he first speaks after being put in the suit. He's concerned about Padme. He's distraught that she's dead. Yet this, to me, is inconsistent with his character and situation. It's also the worst made scene in the saga in every possible way.
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
I agree. If he was so "concerned" about Padme and her well-being--would the dork have choked her in the first place. Retarded.
Author
Time
Not that I mean to defend the prequels too much, but to be fair, by the point he force-chokes her, he has turned to the dark side. Who's to say what the influence that the dark side would have on someone, especially someone as emotional as Anakin was before he turned. I would think that he would be extremely emotional and unpredictable after turning and very prone to violent outbursts that he would later regret, such as killing Padme. So I don't see the inconsistency here.
Author
Time
I suppose that it ties in with the fact that I don't believe the way Anakin is shown to turn to the Dark Side. It just doesn't hold water for me. But it also doesn't sit well with OT Vader, either. The sudden outburst jars with his whole attitude on Mustafar and then when we catch up with him in the OT. It's just not Vader. Couple that with the fact that the whole scene seems to have been edited together from Young Frankenstein and I'm afraid it just leaves me cold.
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
Right, that's how I see it. Anakin was in a "fit" at the time, and that's understandable, it's like a husband beating his wife in a fit of rage, and then later, "Oh God, I'm awful, what have I done?" I can see that, but like you say, Aural, the Anakin is not quite the Vader we see in the OT. Vader is a cool cucumber, calculated and cunning. I just don't see a whole lot of that in the PT Anakin. And, yeah, I know the whole excuse of "but Anakin's younger and he has to GROW into Vader we see in OT." Sigh (shakes head). It just doesn't work. If you want to connect characters throughout a "saga" you must maintain characteristics of the...character you're portraying. Anakin just seems like he's all over the place to me.

Anyway, sorry, that's not what we were discussing, was it?
Author
Time
I was saying that I was thinking of Luke's new Jedi Order having a temple on the moon of Endor or Yavin, as I'm thinking in terms of the Empire not being overthrown at the end of ROTJ. They would therefore need somewhere away from Imperial scrutiny and Massassi already has temple buildings, too. Although, I imagine they may have been knocked about a bit after the Battle Of Yavin!
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
I have started a thread, called 'A revised saga...', in the 'Fan Fiction' forum on outerrimsieges.com, where I will also be posting ideas for people to respond to. I've put up a basic plot for the political situation at the time of my version of the PT.

I'm quite pleased with the way things are going. I'm getting a much clearer idea of the overall setting of the PT. Once I have that in place, I can start focusing on the characters we are going to follow. After that, it will be a case of deciding on the sections that will become episodes I to III. Hopefully, I will then be in a position to start writing.
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
Originally posted by: auraloffalwaffle
Originally posted by: BeeJay
Nobody, it might be getting a bit off-topic. But I might like to have an explanation of what you mean by inconsistent. Emotions of turmoil can't all be the same from day to day or Star Wars movie to Star Wars movie ....emotions are like a storm, and they are always going up and down. Especially with Anakin Skywalker.
...

It's that what we see and what we hear and what we know about his future are not consistent with each other, not that Anakin's emotional state should remain the same throughout. Anakin's responses seem inconsistent with his situation. I honestly feel that his responses to his surroundings and situations seem constantly at odds with who he is and who he will become.


First of all - you see? This is why I didn't want to discuss it. We're distracting these other guys from their discussion of Luke's temple.

Anyway, Aural seems to understand what I mean. Responses is a good word. What I'm talking about is not emotional inconsistency per se, but motivational inconsistency. Emotions may be wild, they may be complex. But they are NEVER random. And Anakin was fairly consistent up until the Fall, in that I could see how each event affected his reasoning. And it seemed to me that the events immediately leading up to Anakin's fall were pushing him further and further AWAY from the Dark side, while nothing compellingly pushed him back towards it. Yet... down on his knee he goes. Not because he felt it, but because the plot required it. From that point on, I lost all sense of who he was.

And that really is the last I'm saying on this here. But feel free to check out the review I put in my old LiveJournal, right after the movie came out: Come to the Dark Side... we have cookies!
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Nobody
... check out the review I put in my old LiveJournal, right after the movie came out: Come to the Dark Side... we have cookies!
Superb! Thanks for that!

I feel the same - the content of the PT wouldn't necessarily be such a problem if it wasn't for the woeful execution of the thing.

Now, as we've drawn a line under that, I'd like to post some further work on my PT project. I've decided to start episode I after Palpatine has become President of the Republic and wars are breaking out all over the place. I plan to keep the 'opening crawl' of the movies and have them as prologues before each novel. This, then, is my attempt at an opening crawl for episode I:

The Old Republic is being torn apart. Spies and assassins are wreaking havoc among the star systems, causing ancient grudges to flame into war.

The Galactic Senate is descending into anarchy as the conflicts erupt. In desperation, the senators are appealing for direct action from the President of the Republic.

The Jedi Order, guardians of peace in the galaxy, have dispatched a group of Knights to find the source of the dark agents and bring them to justice....

All comments welcome!
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
Love the new crawl, but I have a problem with the word president. It sounds bland. How about something like "Supreme Commander of the Rebuplic" or something along those lines.


Author
Time
I only used President due to its use in the prologue of ADF's original SW novelisation.

I guess it also has to show the approach to politics in the Old Republic, so that it contrasts with the Empire and its gathering of power to the Emperor himself.

I'll have a think... Thanks, man!
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
I'm interested to know, how would you handle the Emperor? Does he appear much, or at all, on screen? When is he revealed to be a Sith, if at all?
Author
Time
I'm still working on these points. I have a feeling that I might still keep the 'reveal' of Palpatine for ROTJ. Until then, he would be a character spoken of but not shown, as in ANH. I'm working on capturing the 'moment in time' feel of ANH, i.e. telling a whole story in each episode but revealing information about the characters and the universe around them as we go. Obviously Vader talks to Palpatine via hologram in ESB but the true character is not really seen until ROTJ. I think there will be talk among the Jedi about the Sith and Palpatine's involvement with them but I'll keep any actual revelations of Palpatine's true power until ROTJ.

I'd also like to avoid the sort of explanatory dialogue that started to appear in the PT. I was discussing this on ORS recently. I feel that the appearance of pseudo-scientific explanations for things, e.g. midichlorians, are a departure from the approach in the OT, which took you right into the SW universe and you could draw whatever conclusions you thought best from what you saw.
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
Concealing the fact that Palpatine is a Sith is a good plan, until Episode 3. At that point I don't see how you can effectively tell the story without revealing that he is the evil mastermind behind the downfall of the Republic. Not to mention someone has to tempt Vader to the Dark Side.

Author
Time
I always thought it would've made more sense to use the wookiee slave trade on Kashyyk as a better basis for all the trade federation b.s. versus the republic.
Author
Time
OH, and I should clarify - I think a good prequel trilogy would be based on a completely different series of events and timeline than what actually ended up in the prequels. It would be good to distinguish between what would've made the ones that came out better, and what would have been a better and an entirely different writing of them.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Commander Courage
Concealing the fact that Palpatine is a Sith is a good plan, until Episode 3. At that point I don't see how you can effectively tell the story without revealing that he is the evil mastermind behind the downfall of the Republic. Not to mention someone has to tempt Vader to the Dark Side. True. Though, it's still possible that we may not see Vader's fall to the dark side, as I'm trying to take focus away from Vader's story. It might be something that happens "off-screen", as it were. I like the idea of revelations coming with the Jedi's discoveries of the depth of involvement of the clone plot with the Sith and members of the galactic senate. The audience will know some of the story but some questions will remain unanswered. I like the idea of Palpatine actually being a Sith Master being unknown, even if suspected, until ROTJ.
Originally posted by: gethedgical
I always thought it would've made more sense to use the wookiee slave trade on Kashyyk as a better basis for all the trade federation b.s. versus the republic.
As in the Republic banning the slave trade and the Trade Federation opposing it?Originally posted by: gethedgical
OH, and I should clarify - I think a good prequel trilogy would be based on a completely different series of events and timeline than what actually ended up in the prequels. It would be good to distinguish between what would've made the ones that came out better, and what would have been a better and an entirely different writing of them.
Do you mean telling a story that doesn't involve Ben and Anakin, Vader's fall and the origins of the twins, then?
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
With Kashyyk, I mean that it would have been a much better plot device for the Trade Federation than the Naboo garbage.

With the other comment, I don't mean telling a completely different story than what is hinted about in the OOT, but rather telling it a different way. The Trade Federation/Seperatists/clone storylines are so poorly-developed. One of the few intriguing aspects of the PT for me is the arch of Palpatine's rise to power, and playing the various sides against one another in this master plot. I think that part and the political stuff is decent, but the specifics of Anakin's becoming a jedi and falling to the dark side, the origins of the twins, and relating it all to the revised original trilogy totally blows. There is a list of a million problems with it, which people have covered again and again here, so it doesn't make sense for me to repeat them. What I would love to see are ideas for the prequels that don't have any reference to ideas and characters that came from anywhere other than the Lucas conception of the prequels. The re-writes and ideas I've seen always refer to bettering what is there, and other than the Palpatine stuff, I don't really know what is worth salvaging from that. I don't mind Qui-Gon or Darth Maul, but given that they were tied up in the rest of the garbage and they both die for basically no reason in the first film, theres a bigger and better role that both could have played.
Author
Time
I think Maul was always intended to be "Episode I's villain." Each movie's gotta have one. In the original it's vague, the empire as a whole but also Tarkin and Vader. In Empire it's Boba Fett and Jedi's got Jabba and the Emperor. AOTC had Jango and in Revenge you have Greivous. Maul was a cool character in concept but ultimately the only thing cool about him was his fighting skills.

A friend of mine expressed the same sentiment as you, get. He would've liked to see Maul in a continuing role beyond Episode I and was actually pissed when Obi-Wan killed him. I thought the storyline for Episode I was good in that it centered around the invasion of a planet, one that we've never seen before. It was dissapointing to find that Anakin was from the same frickin' planet as Luke (it was bad enough that we went back there in ROTJ), and while it was nice to see Coruscant, that too was a planet we'd already heard of and seen (in the ROTJ SE). And then what do they do? They go back to the same three planets again in Episode II! That's what frustrates me the most about that movie. Kamino and Geonosis were the only interesting parts. Luckily Episode III stayed the hell away from Tatooine and Naboo until the very end, and even then it was very brief. I think Lucas kept to his original plan for the PT but changed a whole bunch of things along the way. Intercutting a lightsaber duel with another lightsaber duel was a first for the saga, but again, too much coruscant. One defining thing about the OT was that the only location we saw in all three movies was the interior of the millenium falcon. In the PT it's like this entire galaxy far, far away is confined to the senate chamber and palpatine's office. What gives?

I remember hearing ideas for the movies, some of which I'm pretty sure were confirmed facts, that never ended up happening. Episode III in particular, Anakin was supposed to gradually collect pieces that would become his Vader armor. That didn't happen. "The duel" was supposed to go on for quite a while, and maybe it does, but the merits of intercutting it with the yoda/sidious duel is anyone's guess. Mustafar and Utapau were fun to see realized on film.
Author
Time
Was Boba Fett really the 'bad guy' in Empire? He had two or three scenes. This goes back to the overblown importance placed on Fett by some fans and, as a result (and I think far more unfortunately), Lucas. Jango Fett was a terrible 'bad guy'. There were about zero reasons to include him or Boba Fett's backstory in the prequels, and certainly little reason to make it a major plot point for an entire film.

Back to Darth Maul, I think what the films lacked was a consistency in the villian department. Three separate villians who 'look cool' (maybe not so much Count Dooku) all of whom get no character development, no sustained tension surrounding any of them, etc. I realize that ultimately the revelation of Palpatine as Sith Lord is something akin to Vader's presence in the original films, but there was something very real about Vader... Maul had a lot of potential, but it wasn't written in there at all. He was introduced, had a single line of dialogue, fought two lightsaber battles, and died. Thats IT. That is terribly weak character writing! Why not leave him this mysterious figure (with perhaps a bit more screentime to build that tension) and have more revealed into the second movie? Why not have him last all three movies, as a near-equal to Anakin who is finally destroyed by him? I mean, there are a million ways that story could've been told better. All I do is sigh anymore when I think about any of these movies and how wasted their potential was.
Author
Time
They make such a happy couple!
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!
Author
Time
I like where Lucas' right hand is.

Explains a lot if you ask me.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: gethedgical
Was Boba Fett really the 'bad guy' in Empire? He had two or three scenes. This goes back to the overblown importance placed on Fett by some fans and, as a result (and I think far more unfortunately), Lucas. Jango Fett was a terrible 'bad guy'. There were about zero reasons to include him or Boba Fett's backstory in the prequels, and certainly little reason to make it a major plot point for an entire film.
I very much agree with this point of view. Boba Fett was so interesting because he was mysterious and dangerous. But he was never any more important than the means by which Han Solo was parted from his friends. Such a character does not merit his own background scenes in the PT, in my opinion.
Don't you call me a mindless philosopher...!