logo Sign In

read this - 'What the 7 Star Wars films reveal about George Lucas' article

Author
Time

We’re all good, considering that was brought up a year ago and we all had a good laugh at it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

PTOTST in that order said:

TV’s Frink said:

We’re all good, considering that was brought up a year ago and we all had a good laugh at it.

What’s funny about it?

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Filmmaker-and-New-Yorker-film-critic-Richard-Brodys-thoughts-on-the-prequels/id/48007/page/1

15 pages of goodness

I mean, you have to ignore the swagmasta garbage.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

PTOTST in that order said:

TV’s Frink said:

We’re all good, considering that was brought up a year ago and we all had a good laugh at it.

What’s funny about it?

One thing is that the author scolded George for TFA even though he had nothing to do with writing or directing the film. It’s more infuriating than funny.

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

PTOTST in that order said:

TV’s Frink said:

We’re all good, considering that was brought up a year ago and we all had a good laugh at it.

What’s funny about it?

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Filmmaker-and-New-Yorker-film-critic-Richard-Brodys-thoughts-on-the-prequels/id/48007/page/1

15 pages of goodness

I mean, you have to ignore the swagmasta garbage.

I don’t see anything there that makes the article seem less credible…

Author
Time

PTOTST in that order said:

doubleofive said:

PTOTST in that order said:

TV’s Frink said:

We’re all good, considering that was brought up a year ago and we all had a good laugh at it.

What’s funny about it?

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Filmmaker-and-New-Yorker-film-critic-Richard-Brodys-thoughts-on-the-prequels/id/48007/page/1

15 pages of goodness

I mean, you have to ignore the swagmasta garbage.

I don’t see anything there that makes the article seem less credible…

No one should need convincing that it’s not.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

PTOTST in that order said:

doubleofive said:

PTOTST in that order said:

TV’s Frink said:

We’re all good, considering that was brought up a year ago and we all had a good laugh at it.

What’s funny about it?

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Filmmaker-and-New-Yorker-film-critic-Richard-Brodys-thoughts-on-the-prequels/id/48007/page/1

15 pages of goodness

I mean, you have to ignore the swagmasta garbage.

I don’t see anything there that makes the article seem less credible…

No one should need convincing that it’s not.

What makes you say that?

Author
Time

That guy who wrote the 1,000 page rebuttal of RLM’s prequel reviews must have more time on his hands or something.

Author
Time

Not sure if troll or someone with jedimasterobiwan/Spuffy levels of obliviousness.

Author
Time

Suspicious suspiciouscoffee, is Suspicious.

Author
Time

Didn’t read the article but I would guess it reveals that in 76 George liked wwii movies and pirate movies space movies, probably even good movies, and made one, then two… then he started liking money…more than his art. Wait wait wait this post is getting too serious, I’m gonna go back to trying to figure out who’s trolling who…

My fan edit ideas
http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Return-of-the-Sith-Revenge-of-the-Jedi-by-marduk666/id/17356