logo Sign In

Wookie Groomer's 1080p Star Wars Saga project (Released) — Page 15

Author
Time
 (Edited)

ell i have downloaded a couple of rars and made some snapshots to help those that have asked for samples etc.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

well WG has applied colour correction.  I'd need to download the whole disc to give any sort of review of the colour correction but 40GB is just too much for me.

i would say however that there was no benefit with this being a DL-BR as the video quality is the same as the German HDTV broadcast ( which it would be the same as the source no matter how much extra bitrate you give it) that you used so a  SL-BR would have been more than sufficient when the original source was only 17GB.

I'm not knocking what you have done in any way WG, so please don't think that. I know what a pain in the ass attempting the colour correction alone is with these transfers so anyone that attempts it gets my up most respect.

 

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Thanks for the snapshots, Ady. The comparison is most appreciated. :)

Think I'll stick with my AVCHD version for the time being, but once I get enough bandwidth allocation to justify the 40 gig download, I might give this one a whirl...particularly if it starts getting notably good reviews.

Every 27th customer will get a ball-peen hammer, free!

Author
Time
Wookie Groomer said:

I did stuff and I left things alone. If you care then you'll find out. I refuse to outline every damn little tiny thing that I did when I friggen just uploaded a super high quality bluray version of this! You people suck

 

Don't you hate it when people you admire turn out to be, well, less than admirable?

There's an artist's saying: "Do not seek praise, seek criticism". Its an attitude that's supposed to continually improve one's quality of work while maintaining healthy levels of humility and modesty.

When you think about it, its hard to argue against such reasoning.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

For those still debating whether or not to DL a 38.4 GB movie, I try to give my humble opinion.

Haven't watched the whole movie in one sitting yet, mostly just watched my favorite scenes, but I can say that what I have seen and heard thus far has been very pleasing to the eyes and ears. As I posted earlier, on my system, the center channel benefits by being raised about 4db. YMMV.

Included before the film, or main menu starts, is a THX trailer that I don't believe I've seen before. I won't describe it, so as not to spoil it for those who haven't seen it yet. But it's very cleverly done.

The main menu has 6 audio options! The film in DTS 5.1, or Dolby EX 6.1. (I preferred the DTS mix, seems to have a bit more "punch".) 2 Isolated Music Score (soundtrack only) tracks in DTS 5.1 or Stereo PCM options, and 2 running commentaries with cast and crew.

The picture quality is excellent. 1920x1080 MPEG-4 AVC encoded @ an average bitrate of well over 30Mbps. No pixelation, banding, or black level/contrast issues that I can perceive. I've previewed it on my 120" FP LCD, and 50" plasma systems. If this has been color corrected (which the previous screen caps seem to indicate), all I can say is that I'm happy with the colors.

There are 50 chapters, but no scene specific menu access, which is fine by me.

Since I haven't watched the entire film as yet, I can only say that I believe it to be the same (Special Edition) version that was screened on Cinemax HD about a year or so ago. Although I've read in this thread that there was also a screening in Germany. Whether this transfer is from the former or the later I cannot say.

For those of you with a fast internet connection, and a means to mount/play (or burn) a large BD .iso file, I'd say... GO FOR IT!

I can't wait for the rest of the films done in a similar fashion.

 

Author
Time

Wookiegroomer... is your work on these Blu-Ray releases turning you to the dark side of the force? I can feel the hatred swelling in you now. ;) I'm probably not in the minority thinking this has become way too much drama for something that's supposed to be enjoyable for all of us. Anyone else on here manage to get this and want to share some details on the edit?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

BD-D2 said:

...watched...my favorite scenes, ... I can say that what I have seen and heard thus far has been very pleasing to the eyes and ears. ...

...I've previewed it on my 120" FP LCD, and 50" plasma systems....

What model is your 120" FP LCD?

Star Wars Episode XXX: Erica Strikes Back

         Davnes007 LogoCanadian Flag

          If you want Nice, go to France

Author
Time

Is there any comparisons of 2004 screens and WG's screens with WG's being 1080p and note scaled down? I want to see if it actually looks HD or not.

Star Wars Renascent

Inspired by the Godfather Part II and a revamp of Star Wars: Reborn

View the discussion thread

Author
Time
Davnes007 said:

 

BD-D2 said:

...watched...my favorite scenes, ... I can say that what I have seen and heard thus far has been very pleasing to the eyes and ears. ...

...I've previewed it on my 120" FP LCD, and 50" plasma systems....

 

What model is your 120" FP LCD?

Panasonic AE2000. Homemade (Wilsonart Designer White) 120" screen.

 

Author
Time

Wookiegroomer,

I would first like to thank you for all of your hard work and effort in prepping this for BR. I will download it even though I do not currently have a BR burner (yet). I also look forward to the other two films once you are finished with them.

What I don't understand is the hostility and almost childlike responses that you have left in the last few pages of this very thread. Please inform us of any wrong doing on our part. I for one have only seen valid questions and request from the other members of this forum... Screen caps, samples, details on extras, encode size, and so on.

I am sure in the amount of time it took you to write the sentence ending in 'you people suck' you could have answered the question(s) or just typed too many to list, see cover for details, etc..

If you want me to bow down to you, it will not happen. But you will receive great praise from me on your work and your efforts (both current and hopefully future projects).

To accept and give criticism both good and bad is how we grow and learn.

I do not want an apology nor will I give one. This is my opinion and you will either accept it or as one put is so well 'move along".

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Wookie Groomer, what happened to your avatar? May I suggest this one:

Author
Time

Well I have downloaded this and extracted the rars.  As I'm not sure how to mount/play a BD iso, I've ordered a couple of BD50 discs that I should get tomorrow so will burn it as soon as I get in from work :¬)

But, I have to say that I LOVE the BD case art that Wookie Groomer has supplied with this and have already printed it out and put it in an empty blu ray case that I have sitting here, ready and waiting!!

Personally speaking, I like the look of the samples that Adywan posted further back in this thread and am really looking forward to burning and watching this tomorrow night.

Huge thanks to Wookie Groomer once again for all his hard work on this.  I really, really hope that he continues with this project and completes all six movies.....or my one ESB is going to look pretty loney on my blu-ray shelf....!!! 

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I have a question.

How did wookie groomer get dts audio when their has never been a home video release or tv broadcast of star wars in dts?

I know the theatrical release of the special editions in 1997 had dts but when the 2004 dvd release came along Lucas who must have huge shares in dolby forgot to include it,lol.

I think it was six track dts also.  Though some claim Dolby Digital 5.1 EX with it lower sample rate sounds the same.

Plus their has never been a 5.1 DVD audio release of the soundtrack much less in dts.  I wonder if these options are wookie's home brew?

I would personally like at some point to see unaltered blu ray versions of the 2004 as broadcast preserved.  It is all well and good to color correct and remove greedo shooting first but neither of those was in the broadcast version.

I must say wookie groomer's release with all the bells and whistles in terms of audio does make adywan's look a bit barebones. 

Not sure which looks better in terms of image quality.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time

I think Wookie's is higher quality (it's compressed on a freakin BD-50, Ady's is DVD9) but Ady's has better color correction judging by those screenshots.

Author
Time

WG could've taken an uncompressed 5.1 PCM soundtrack from LD and encoded that as DTS.

We'll never know because he won't tell us and prefers to insult us for merely inquiring... ;)

Author
Time
The Griff said:

WG could've taken an uncompressed 5.1 PCM soundtrack from LD...

No he couldn't, because such a thing does not exist.

 

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
Moth3r said:
The Griff said:

WG could've taken an uncompressed 5.1 PCM soundtrack from LD...

No he couldn't, because such a thing does not exist.

 

Whoops. Beats me then!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

It looks liike he is releasing a final version.

From the abhdtv.net forum.

Wookie Groomer:

"I am building the final Bluray ISO that is about 45GB and has a nice little 10 minute TriScreen vignette feature showing the differences between the color adjustments and the original. Plan on seeing that final release in the next couple days. This is the final and is the bluray template I will be using for the remaining trilogy".

-Will

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Octorox said:

I think Wookie's is higher quality (it's compressed on a freakin BD-50, Ady's is DVD9) but Ady's has better color correction judging by those screenshots.

This is a ridiculous statement, all WG did as up the bitrate when recompressing the GermanHD transfers, and seeing as how there is no DTS to draw from I'll assume he did the same for the audio. Just cause its 45 gigs doens't make it 1080p its an upscale convert, I could jack up the bitrate on any video and get a 100 gig file doens;t mean theres any more detail to be had. If you feel the need to have a BD with DVD quality detail to go on ahead but 45gigs is crazy talk for this download.

dlbsyst said:

It looks liike he is releasing a final version.

From the abhdtv.net forum.

Wookie Groomer:

"I am building the final Bluray ISO that is about 45GB and has a nice little 10 minute TriScreen vignette feature showing the differences between the color adjustments and the original. Plan on seeing that final release in the next couple days. This is the final and is the bluray template I will be using for the remaining trilogy".

-Will

Got time for a 10 minute vignette but not screenshots? or a sample clip? oh wait I forgot... we suck. :p

 

_________________

In the Works - TMNT:Return to New York -

robduenas.deviantart.com

sketchrob.com

 

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)
sketchrob said:
Octorox said:

I think Wookie's is higher quality (it's compressed on a freakin BD-50, Ady's is DVD9) but Ady's has better color correction judging by those screenshots.

This is a ridiculous statement, all WG did as up the bitrate when recompressing the GermanHD transfers, and seeing as how there is no DTS to draw from I'll assume he did the same for the audio. Just cause its 45 gigs doens't make it 1080p its an upscale convert, I could jack up the bitrate on any video and get a 100 gig file doens;t mean theres any more detail to be had. If you feel the need to have a BD with DVD quality detail to go on ahead but 45gigs is crazy talk for this download.

dlbsyst said:

It looks liike he is releasing a final version.

From the abhdtv.net forum.

Wookie Groomer:

"I am building the final Bluray ISO that is about 45GB and has a nice little 10 minute TriScreen vignette feature showing the differences between the color adjustments and the original. Plan on seeing that final release in the next couple days. This is the final and is the bluray template I will be using for the remaining trilogy".

-Will

Got time for a 10 minute vignette but not screenshots? or a sample clip? oh wait I forgot... we suck. :p

 

well the original was 16gb. this is compressed to 50gb and ady's was compressed to about 8gb. Of course the quality is going to be better, however a BD25 definetely would have been enough

Plus the german broadcasts are 1080p, not DVD quality

Author
Time
Octorox said:

well the original was 16gb. this is compressed to 50gb and ady's was compressed to about 8gb. Of course the quality is going to be better, however a BD25 definetely would have been enough

Plus the german broadcasts are 1080p, not DVD quality

Yeah its been upscaled to 50gigs by recompressing the 16 gig file at a higher bit riate, that doesnt mean you get any more detail, in fact at 50" or higher screen I wonder if it wouldn't be even softer than the 16gb version.

As for the German broadcasts, they might be "1080p" but it looks like a more uncompressed version of the 2k transers done in 2004. If an actual Blu-Ray were to be made today from Lucasfilm, I'm sure we would see a 4K or 8K transfer from the orig SE negative, I recommend you compare the Wizard of Oz 2K DVD to the new 8K Blu Ray. It would be that drastic and an improvement. Just cause it fits on a BD-25/50 doesn't make it so, this reminds me alot of the the 16bit wars of the early 1990s lol Then we had 32 bits then 64 bits... really it comes down to the source material, to get the Life like expierience on Bluray you need a higher transfer from the film stock.

Personally, I just dont see the point for downloading 45gb of data that is the same detail as the 16bg version, of course there is color correct, but none of us here would have known that if it weren't for Ady posting pics. And lets not even bother with the DTS claim...  Which brings me back to WG's wierd behavior here on the boards.. haven't seen that kind of stuff since Anti-Matter...

 

_________________

In the Works - TMNT:Return to New York -

robduenas.deviantart.com

sketchrob.com

 

 

Author
Time

And the colour-correction is hardly a major selling point, since we already have Adywan's colour-corrected HD version. Yes, I know it's been compressed from 16g video to...what was it...an 8g release? Still, the compression bothers me a good deal less than the notion of downloading 50g, and the manner in which this release was presented to the community. Not intending to be a prick, but still...a little civility goes a long way...

Every 27th customer will get a ball-peen hammer, free!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The star wars transfers were sent off to Lowry in 1080P resolution.  Which Lucas apparently thinks is archival quality.  Just a few years ago i think he said DVD was archival quality.

That 1080 master might have passed for a dvd and a tv broadcast but won't pass muster with a blu ray release.  They have to start out at least at miminal 4k and then compress down to 1080.

You have to roll over laughing 1080 is not even comparable to the resolving power of 35mm motion picture film much less a film trilogy that was designed to be shown in a showcase 70mm with the special effects produced on a extra large negaive area in vistavision i believe at 65mm. Or was that 60mm cannot remember the exact figure but 6k is miminally acceptable for vistavision opticals but probably should be rendered at 8k.

Phantom Menace was the last star wars movie produced on film.   Episode II and III will look barely ok on blu ray.  Anything higher than that in the future and the films will look like shit.

Lucas used HD video an unproven format to make his last 2 star wars movies.  Therefore they won't ever be archival quality.   And they look best of digital projection and look even worse when printed back to 35mm film.

Phantom Menace on the other hand could be rescanned at 4k or higher yeilding a very consistant blu ray image to the theatrical version as long as lucas and his pals don't dial up the dnr like they so love to do.

I have never seen the 1080 master of star wars as broadcast and really cannot comment if the grain stucture is intact but the mere mention of the name Lowry Digital these days infuriates me because of their digital grain removal process and digital color correction algorithms ruin films.

Some films i even have read people think they removed too much grain and then added it back in with fake digital grain.  I mean that is so totally absurd an idea and laughable if there is any truth to its validity.

Some films and negatives are so far gone that they have to be restored both in the digital domain and repaired, washed and chemically restored frame by frame, reel by reel.  Not every movie can afford the Harris treatment.  I wish all my favorite movies could be restored at the level of Lawrence of Arabia, or the first 2 godfather films etc.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
NEW UPLOAD (he is currently uploading)
TriScreenSample Looks and Sounds PERFECT!
Covers are fantastic as well.
Wookiegroomer you rock!
Thank you.