logo Sign In

Why no mention of "Sith" in Episodes IV-VI? — Page 2

Author
Time
Post link
And by rough, he meant NOTHING AT ALL.
“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” — Nazi Reich Marshal Hermann Goering
Author
Time
Post link
Quote
Originally posted by: Ell the Ewok
There are only ever 2 Sith, and grevious wasnt counted as a sith, he was trained the Jedi arts but that dosnt make him a jedi. Also why would Yoda or Obi wan say like 'yes my young padawan' when Luke knows nothing of padawanship?


Sounds like you're interested in doing mental gymnastics to have it all make sense. Either way, I think GL introduced the concept of the 'rule of two' to explain something which has *kind of* puzzled me, even within the OT. When Darth Sidious assumed control of the Galactic Empire, why didn't Sith teachings thrive under his rule? I suppose he didn't want any challenge to his power, but still...
MTFBWY. Always.

http://www.myspace.com/red_ajax
Author
Time
Post link
Why no mention of Sith? Because George Lucas doesn't care about black people.

*see caption thread for proof*

A long time ago in the faraway galaxy...

Star War: The Third Gathers
Backstroke Of The West