logo Sign In

Who's worse, TFN or the official site, starwars.com?

Author
Time
 (Edited)


I haven't spent much time at TFN but I would have to say the moderators are definitely worse at the official site, but the posters are worse at TFN. On official site forum, if you say anything bad about Lucas, basically what will happen is the moderators will put 24/7 surveillance on you and find any opportunity they can to ban you. And it doesn't end there, they'll memorize the way you type so if you make a new account after you're former one is banned (which is called being a sock) the moderators search for similar posting types and will banned you if they suspect you're a sock. Even if you make 2 accounts and you obey their TOS (which is like 20 pages long!) they will still banned you because making more than one account is against their TOS. Even after 1 year, I made a new account and the SW.com mnoderators found me within like ten minuets. They talk dorky using one liners from the movies and act like they own you. The only kind of talk that the moderators like to see at the forum is basically juvenile talk about how great the PT is, how great the changes to the OT are, and how great Lucas is. If you go outside of that range, they want to ban you. They should just call it prequellovers.com. You'd be surprised though how many OT.com type people were there. When new of the GOUT come ouyt. There were people on there discussing how they wanted to send back the '04 disks too. Most of them are probably banned by now though. One time when I flamed Lucas on the SW.com forum the moderator replied: Right, flame the owner of the site, what a bright idea. Like Lucas is going to track down an individual that doesn't like him.

Author
Time

I don't care about either site really. I like slower websites where I don't have to read as much crap.

About your experiences, however, I'd imagine an OT fan could survive on those forums if he or she were sufficiently polite. I don't know though. Being forced to always be polite is boring.

"Now all Lucas has to do is make a cgi version of himself.  It will be better than the original and fit his original vision." - skyjedi2005

Author
Time

It doesn't matter if you're polite.  

If you are not a fan of the SEs or PT at TFN, you get lambasted, regardless of how politely you express your opinion. 

Author
Time
Mielr said:

It doesn't matter if you're polite.

If you are not a fan of the SEs or PT at TFN, you get lambasted, regardless of how politely you express your opinion.

Then I actually feel greater sorrow for the people doing the banning (as apposed to the banned). If they live for "George Lucas" more than real contact with real people, then that's sad.

"Now all Lucas has to do is make a cgi version of himself.  It will be better than the original and fit his original vision." - skyjedi2005

Author
Time

Ehh...they're pretty comparable in terms of their intolerance of divergent opinions and general all around lack of intelligence. If I had to cast a vote for which is worse, it would be for TFN. At least Starwars.com is the official site, so it goes without saying that it'd be chock full of Lucas Apologists.

Every 27th customer will get a ball-peen hammer, free!

Author
Time
Mielr said:

It doesn't matter if you're polite.  

If you are not a fan of the SEs or PT at TFN, you get lambasted, regardless of how politely you express your opinion. 

 

Gee, this sounds familiar, only substitute "are not a fan of the SEs or PT at TFN" with "are a fan of the SEs or PT at OT.com".  Glass houses, fellas.

There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary, and those who do not.
Author
Time

Gotta disagree, MJPollard. We have strong opinions over here, but we're not knee-jerk reactionaries who'll shout down, persecute, and flame anyone who disagrees. More likely, there'll be a lively discussion about why we disagree. Whereas, at TFN, they don't believe in discussions. If you don't like the SE or PT, you're not worthy of having your opinion heard. Period.

Every 27th customer will get a ball-peen hammer, free!

Author
Time
MJPollard said:

 Gee, this sounds familiar, only substitute "are not a fan of the SEs or PT at TFN" with "are a fan of the SEs or PT at OT.com".  Glass houses, fellas.

MJ Pollard, can you name one person who was banned here for expressing his/her opinions?  Just because people argue on this site, or any site, doesn't mean you or I don't have a right to say whatever the heck we want.

The problem with TFN, is they actually would ban people FOR their views!  I got banned there 2 years ago for arguing with the fans that the OOT DVD was utter shit, and everyone kept coming back to me and said, "You are getting what you deserve!"  And in all their posts they were disrespecting the OOT versions, the fans, etc, and when I came back at them along with Zombie, and Harlock we were all banned that day because the argument got heated, yet none of the anti-OOT people were banned!  I was permabanned by Darth Sapient, who now was banned from TFN for stalking women via PM's.  Now thats karma!

Sure people here will get on people who like the PT, SE, and EU stuff, but it is all in fun debate, and the last time I checked nobody was every banned here for taking a point of view.  That is the difference between OT.com & TFN.

 

Author
Time

I don't know about you guys, but I have yet to see the level of extreme behavior on TF.N that you describe. Hell, other than Go-Mer-Tonic (may he burn in the torturous afterlife cesspool of your choice), I remember not one person coming to GL's defense in zombie's Secret History thread over there. Can you point me to the topics where everyone seemed to be so belligerent? I spend most of my time there on the EU boards, and the discussion there is usual amicable (if a tad nerdy, but that's the pot calling the kettle black).

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Johnboy3434 said:

I don't know about you guys, but I have yet to see the level of extreme behavior on TF.N that you describe. Hell, other than Go-Mer-Tonic (may he burn in the torturous afterlife cesspool of your choice), I remember not one person coming to GL's defense in zombie's Secret History thread over there. Can you point me to the topics where everyone seemed to be so belligerent? I spend most of my time there on the EU boards, and the discussion there is usual amicable (if a tad nerdy, but that's the pot calling the kettle black).

 

 Well I haven't posted since 2006, but you have to go back to the old PT threads, as the usual suspects would come out every time.  People like Shelley would PM me all the time and tell me to leave the site and wondered why I posted there. 

The most ridiculous modding was the Mace vs Sidious thread, as that led to the inception of ORS.com, as about 20 people (gushers/bashers) were all banned because of that thread.

It goes like this:  Before ROTS DVD, mods like RebelScum77 said that Sidious threw the fight against Mace Windu, and would not accept anyone with a dissenting opinion, as they believed that Sidious could not lose to Mace.

So the ROTS DVD comes out in November, and Lucas says that Mace was beating Sidious up to the point where Anakin comes in.  So all the posters who said that BEFORE the DVD were not allowed to argue that point even though Lucas said it!  RebelScum77 started banning people and warning people not to argue that Mace really won, and Sidious still won the fight!  So about 20 guys from TFN like Yoshifett were banned or warned continously by RebelScum77 and started ORS.com and we still chuckle about it today on that site as RebelScum77 STILL won't take any diverging viewpoints in that thread as she threatened to close it after they left.

If you can find Mace vs Sidious thread in the PT forum, it is hilareous how fucking serious these mods got and how they would yield their power over a bunch of people who just wanted to debate the movies. Overall, TFN is just a boring place now as most of the good posters, bashers and gushers, have left or been banned, and now you have just a bunch of teenagers talking about the movies and how ROTS is as great Lawrence of Arabia. (I kid you not, I did read that from a post once!)

Author
Time

I googled ORS.com but couldn't find anything that was about the PT. What is ORS short for? I don't care what Lucas says about the movies, I interpret them my own way. Some of the stuff he has said about the OT in the commentary of the '04 DVDS was ludicrous. Like in the ROTJ commentary, when the Emperor was tempting Luke to strike him down, Lucas said that Darth Vader wanted Luke to kill him and the Emperor wanted Luke to kill Vader. Umm, that doesn't make any sense. The way I always interpreted it was this: The Emperor was tempting Luke because he knew Darth Vader would defend him and he wanted Luke to fight Vader so he would indulge in his dark side.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Wow, I just went to TFN and I don't think I will be going back. First of all, the colors they picked for the forum are so loud and irritating on the eyes.  It's too busy and too many useless posters . I like it here, the colors are soothing on the eyes, you guys are smart, and it's not so busy.

Author
Time

Well, I can't answer too much because I don't know everything, but ORS stands for Outer Rim Sieges.  And I agree.  Lucas's explanations for things in ROTJ, particularly about Vader's and Palpatine's motivations, make absolutely no sense at all.  Like, for example, if Vader really was trying to rebel against the emperor, why not take Luke up on his offer to "come with him" instead of taking him back to the Death Star?  Eh, it's all ridiculous.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

I don't know about TFN these days, but it felt like there were a lot of jagoffs there in 2006 during the dvd mess. "You'll never be satisfied, how dare you criticize this generous gift, you get what you deserve" blah blah.  As the biggest Star Wars site in the world, it really is a shame they took that attitude, it has probably helped make the (apparently smaller) group that cares about the treating the original versions properly very easy to dismiss. 

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Who gives a shit what Lucas says about Return of the Jedi.

That is not his movie it is Richard Marquand's, besides the bad ideas in the film like death star II and ewoks anything that was good about the movie was because of Marquand and Lawrence Kasden who actually wrote the movie.

People talk about how bad it was to replace Shaw because he was dead, what about wrecking a movie you did not even write or direct.

Empire is superior also because it was not written or directed by Lucas.

He had a lot of help on that first movie as well. The best dialogue in the film was Written By Gloria Katz and Willard Huyck.

Also less yes men and a great producer in Gary Kurtz.

I hate the Rick Mcallum Yes men era that began with the Awful radioland murders and flop Young Indiana Jones chronicles.

Which had some great episodes despite Lucas and Mcallums involvement.

You could sort of say the yes men began with Howard Kazanjian on Return of The Jedi. Though somehow Raiders turned out great and he produced that.

Though to be fair not everyone Can keep the same level of quality constant. The Huycks may have written 30% of star wars 1977 and American Graffiti, but they also wrote Howard the Duck, Temple of Doom, and Radioland Murders.

Kasden went off and made a Crappy Steven King Movie, and Kershner made Never Say never again.

At least Gary had some creative success with other projects Like Return to OZ and The Dark Crystal. Though financially he was finished, because Lucas cut him off and pretty much made sure he would never work in hollywood again and he never forgave him for empire strikes back going over budget, and Siding with Kersh instead of backing him up.

The power of star wars 77 and Raiders is all there in the editing and the human element infused by Marcia Lucas insistance .

 

It was never made a secret that Lucas better half was Marcia and without her he was definetely not half as much a filmmaker or human being without her.

Pollock Dale said it best when he remarked her skills as an editor and confidant on his movies smoothed out a lot of the weaker parts.

Lucas was never much for directing people in films, his strengths were mostly visual and technically related, he was not much of a writer or storyteller. Without all the writers and craftsmen whom he takes all the credit for their work his films would all be failures.

If you add up all the shit films and flops Between Lucas and Spielberg i wonder who has more, this would include as creative consultants or producers. Then you can add on the moneymakers that were crap even despite not being financial flops.

Speilberg: War of the Worlds, 1941, Temple of Doom. Kingdom Of the Crystal Skull, transformers.

Lucas: Howard the Duck, More American Graffiti. Star wars holiday special. episodes 1-3, clone wars. Young Indiana Jones, Kingdom of the crystal skull. Radioland Murders, Tucker the man and his dream, willow.


 

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time

Actually, GL did co-write RotJ. ESB was the only SW movie (until the most recent one) he didn't at least help write.

Author
Time

Uh, Lucas wrote the movie. Then, Kasdan did polishes/rewrites later. Lucas is just uncredited. Brackett's draft wasn't used. 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

One thing I got a kick out of going to the offical site and TFN forums was this: Anytime you pointed out an issue with the story or an inadequacy in the prequels, the Lucas fans boys would rush in and start giving me a bunch of reasons why these issues or inadequacies are really not inadequcies at all and acutally are absolutely perfect and George Lucas is a god who can do no wrong and the prequels are perfect etc.

For example. Before episode 3 came out, I made a post about episode 2, how I thought the story was really poor especially at the point where Hayden and Padme leave Tatoonie and take C3p0 with them and never consult with the Lars.

They started telling me things like: Oh Anakin was depressed at the time and the Lars were morning his mom's loss so it wasn't necessary to consult with them and Anakin has a little bit of a dark side and that was GL's way of conveying that, he didn't consult with him because of his "dark side". Then they went on about how Anakin's awkwardness was deliberate to show his dark side, oooooooowwwwwww.

Author
Time

http://boards.theforce.net/classic_trilogy/b10002/29117394/p1

It's surprising that this thread has lasted as long as it has. The thread is about Morrison's lackluster performance as Boba Fett's voice-over, and is riddled with SE criticisms.

"Fuck you. All the star wars movies were excellent. none of them sucked. Also, revenge of the sith is the best."

- DarthZorgon (YouTube)

Author
Time

A very good reason why i have seen the 2004 cut of empire only once.  Awful redub of boba's voice, the new bad cgi emperor and bad vader dialogue.  I don't like the 1997 version either but at least that kept Wingreens voice as boba, and The more mysterius Emperor Voiced by Clive Revill who ive always liked better than the comic book esque villain of jedi.

I asolutely also hate The 2004 jedi Hayden in the jedi ghost trio and Jar Jar binks "weesa free", god somebody should have told Lucas those were terrible ideas.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
skyjedi2005 said:

Lucas: Howard the Duck, More American Graffiti. Star wars holiday special. episodes 1-3, clone wars. Young Indiana Jones, Kingdom of the crystal skull. Radioland Murders, Tucker the man and his dream, willow. 

I had to point out: as much as we might like to, we can't blame Lucas for the Star Wars Holiday Special.  That one was out of his hands; he didn't write it or direct it.  Just an initial story idea was the extent of his involvement...and if they'd done it the way he'd envisioned it, I'm sure it would have been much, much better.

--SKot 

Projects:
Return Of The Ewok and Other Short Films (with OCPmovie) [COMPLETED]
Preserving the…cringe…Star Wars Holiday Special [COMPLETED]
The Star Wars TV Commercials Project [DORMANT]
Felix the Cat 1919-1930 early film shorts preservation [ONGOING]
Lights Out! (lost TV anthology shows) [ONGOING]
Iznogoud (1995 animated series) English audio preservation [ONGOING]

Author
Time
SKot said:
skyjedi2005 said:

Lucas: Howard the Duck, More American Graffiti. Star wars holiday special. episodes 1-3, clone wars. Young Indiana Jones, Kingdom of the crystal skull. Radioland Murders, Tucker the man and his dream, willow. 

I had to point out: as much as we might like to, we can't blame Lucas for the Star Wars Holiday Special.  That one was out of his hands; he didn't write it or direct it.  Just an initial story idea was the extent of his involvement...and if they'd done it the way he'd envisioned it, I'm sure it would have been much, much better.

--SKot 

That's true.  You can't blame him for this.  He publicly hated it even before it went on the air.

 

Episode II: Shroud of the Dark Side

Emperor Jar-Jar
“Back when we made Star Wars, we just couldn’t make Palpatine as evil as we intended. Now, thanks to the miracles of technology, it is finally possible. Finally, I’ve created the movies that I originally imagined.” -George Lucas on the 2007 Extra Extra Special HD-DVD Edition

Author
Time

http://boards.theforce.net/classic_trilogy/b10002/29117394/p1

It's surprising that this thread has lasted as long as it has. The thread is about Morrison's lackluster performance as Boba Fett's voice-over, and is riddled with SE criticisms.

"Fuck you. All the star wars movies were excellent. none of them sucked. Also, revenge of the sith is the best."

- DarthZorgon (YouTube)