logo Sign In

When/Why did you become an OT purist? — Page 2

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

The topic is when/why you became a purist.  You are not one.  Get out.

ok. I apologize for the oh-so terrible-and tragic news that the entire world/country and president barack obama should know about that I acidentally went off topic on an internet forum website that 7 billion people know about, I apologize for accidentally believing that writing about my disagreements with OT purists was somehow being on-topic and not off-topic.

You get out, bro......

Author
Time

SilverWook said:


EDIT: My bad, it wasn't the AFI. It was an L.A. film festival in 2003.

http://www.filmbuffonline.com/Editorial/EditorialStarWars.htm

AFI was forced to show the 2004 edition on a separate occasion though, you're correct. Same with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts; in 2007, they showed the SE for the "Great to be Nominated" screening of Star Wars.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Father Skywalker said:

TV's Frink said:

The topic is when/why you became a purist.  You are not one.  Get out.

ok. I apologize for the oh-so terrible-and tragic news that the entire world/country and president barack obama should know about that I acidentally went off topic on an internet forum website that 7 billion people know about, I apologize for accidentally believing that writing about my disagreements with OT purists was somehow being on-topic and not off-topic.

You get out, bro......

I take a dim view of you talking to a respected member of this board like that.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Father Skywalker said:

TV's Frink said:

The topic is when/why you became a purist.  You are not one.  Get out.

ok. I apologize for the oh-so terrible-and tragic news that the entire world/country and president barack obama should know about that I acidentally went off topic on an internet forum website that 7 billion people know about, I apologize for accidentally believing that writing about my disagreements with OT purists was somehow being on-topic and not off-topic.

You get out, bro......

I take a dim view of you talking to a respected member of this board like that.

i wrote some posts, and other users interpreted them as being off-topic. That was totally unintentional. I had believed that what i wrote was being on-topic, which maybe it wasn't, maybe it was off-topic, but, rather than being told that politely and respectfully, he told me to simply "get out" in what I felt was a rude and an offensive post. That is why i responded so sarcastically.......

What do U mean by a respected member?? Is that implying that certain members here aren't respected, or aren't respected as much?? How do U earn that level of respect??

Author
Time

By lurking and figuring out this place before posting half a dozen threads? By learning how to interact with people and not piss them off all the time?

You've been tolerated this long on the slim chance you're young and just don't know any better, instead of being a troll.

I'm getting to the point where I won't care one way or the other, because either everybody will put you on ignore, or one of the mods (probably me) bans you. Your choice...

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Farter Skywanker said:

TV's Frink said:

The topic is when/why you became a purist.  You are not one.  Get out.

ok. I apologize for the oh-so terrible-and tragic news that the entire world/country and president barack obama should know about that I acidentally went off topic on an internet forum website that 7 billion people know about, I apologize for accidentally believing that writing about my disagreements with OT purists was somehow being on-topic and not off-topic.

You get out, bro......

I take a dim view of you talking to a respected member of this board like that.

Looks like someone is skating on very thin ice here. Could he soon be adding ANOTHER website to his "I've been banned" list ?

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

adywan said:

SilverWook said:

Farter Skywanker said:

TV's Frink said:

The topic is when/why you became a purist.  You are not one.  Get out.

ok. I apologize for the oh-so terrible-and tragic news that the entire world/country and president barack obama should know about that I acidentally went off topic on an internet forum website that 7 billion people know about, I apologize for accidentally believing that writing about my disagreements with OT purists was somehow being on-topic and not off-topic.

You get out, bro......

I take a dim view of you talking to a respected member of this board like that.

Looks like someone is skating on very thin ice here. Could he soon be adding ANOTHER website to his "I've been banned" list ?

insomniac game forums-in the ratchet and clank forum.

The Jedi Council Forums/the force.net message boards forums

Twitter (for sending unsolicited messages, whatever the hell/heck that means)

Wookipedia

 The Yu Gi Oh Wikipedia/Wiki

The Twilight Wikipedia/Wiki

Stargate and Star Trek Wikis

This is the last post that I'll make about this topic. Im just gonna discuss the main topic thread from now on.......

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I have a question about the original trilogy (the OT purism). Is it all a scale of black-and-white morality???

I mean, what if I support some of the SE special edition changes, but I am against some of them, what scale am I on there???

I am against Hayden Christensen's ghost......

Author
Time

It was like 2002 or so when I found out there were changes. We had the 90's trilogy Box Set on VHS, and I being to young to really remember was oblivious to the SE. Watching Empire at my uncle's house and seeing the Cloud City CGI was my first dose. but that didn't bother me. It was buying the 2004 DVD set that really got to me. I got to see what they did to Star Wars.

So really, I never got the SE on VHS, my parents didn't buy movies more than once. Good thing I got to be ignorant to the SE up to my teenage years.

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time

I hated that stupid CGI video game/anime/cartoony crappy looking Jabba the Hutt in star wars episode 4 a new hope SE special edition

 

Compare that CGI-looking piece of crap to this

Author
Time

Father Skywalker said:

I have a question about the original trilogy (the OT purism). Is it all a scale of black-and-white morality???

I mean, what if I support some of the SE special edition changes, but I am against some of them, what scale am I on there???

I am against Hayden Christensen's ghost......

What it all boils down to is this:

Do you think the original unaltered films should be available for anyone who wants to buy them or see them? There's nothing wrong with multiple versions of a film, but when you're repeatedly told you can't have those other versions ever again, (and that they're inferior in some way) not even be able to show people what they were like back then, we think there's something wrong about that.

We simply want to see the old movies we grew up as with any other classic films.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Father Skywalker said:

I hated that stupid CGI video game/anime/cartoony crappy looking Jabba the Hutt in star wars episode 4 a new hope SE special edition

 

Compare that CGI-looking piece of crap to this

The 1997 Jabba, (which is hard to even see now) is actually worse.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Father Skywalker said:

I have a question about the original trilogy (the OT purism). Is it all a scale of black-and-white morality???

I mean, what if I support some of the SE special edition changes, but I am against some of them, what scale am I on there???

I am against Hayden Christensen's ghost......

What it all boils down to is this:

Do you think the original unaltered films should be available for anyone who wants to buy them or see them? There's nothing wrong with multiple versions of a film, but when you're repeatedly told you can't have those other versions ever again, (and that they're inferior in some way) not even be able to show people what they were like back then, we think there's something wrong about that.

We simply want to see the old movies we grew up as with any other classic films.

People who want the original unaltered films should have the right to buy them or see them, yes i agree with U. I have a question. R U implying that Lucasfilm wants to make it illegal/ a crime to own the original unlatered ones......

I am kinda somewhere in the middle, I actually kinda like some of the SE special edition changes, but to make it a crime to own the originals makes no sense at all.......

Will my older brother's star wars movies on VHS be confiscated now???

Author
Time

No, it's not illegal to own an old VHS. Lucas has implied in interviews that he won't be sorry when the last tape wears out. He wants people to forget the originals. Even Laserdiscs may be unplayable someday when it's no longer possible to get a player fixed.

Even the 1997 versions are fading from people's memory. As is the theatrical cut of Episode One. Neither of these has ever been on DVD as they were in theaters.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

No, it's not illegal to own an old VHS. Lucas has implied in interviews that he won't be sorry when the last tape wears out. He wants people to forget the originals. Even Laserdiscs may be unplayable someday when it's no longer possible to get a player fixed.

Even the 1997 versions are fading from people's memory. As is the theatrical cut of Episode One. Neither of these has ever been on DVD as they were in theaters.

then what is/would be illegal???

What's is the main problme/issue here, exactly???

Author
Time

Well, as Obi Wan once said, that greatly depends on your point of view. You can't buy them on the new format, but the old formats won't last much longer. (Future tv sets may not even have the old analog video inputs.)

We would all love to pay George for a super deluxe Blu Ray set that has everything but the kitchen sink, but he doesn't want to to that. What's a fan of the old version to do that isn't technically illegal if they want to keep watching what they already paid for?

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

To me the Saga has always been from the adventures of Luke Skywalker and the films that came out in 1977-1983.  As well as the comic adaptations, the first two radio dramas.

To me the special editions are as much EU as the prequels and poor substitutes for the real thing.

Not so much a purist per se, since i have no problem with the prequels existing and the multiple versions of the original trilogy as long as the originals get restored to their proper place rather than treated as cast off garbage.

I can wish the special editions and prequels did not exist, but it is easier to recognize them not as Canon with the oot, or as a revised universe starting in like 1994 or so.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Father Skywalker said:

What's is the main problme/issue here, exactly???

For 20 years, the original films were available for average people to see in better than Blu-ray quality.  All you had to do was go to a theatre showing them, buy a ticket, and watch.  Today, if a theatre is caught showing the original films, they are quickly confiscated.

Back in '97, most didn't immediately see the impact of this policy change.  Like you said, the public still had VHS tapes and Laserdiscs, which, while certainly not as good as 35mm film, were good enough for most people's televisions at the time.  And since going to the theatre was falling out of fashion even then, people might not have considered exactly how much better the films looked before they were reduced to VHS and Laserdisc.

Now, not only are those obsolete formats becoming increasingly difficult to play, but two new formats (DVD and Blu-ray) have come along to remind audiences about that quality gap between 35mm film and VHS tape.

The GOUT release (the out-of-print bonus disc DVD release) was a Laserdisc-quality release on the DVD format (not to mention that Star Wars got the wrong soundtrack in this release), so it didn't really do much for fans other than provide a really distorted view of what the originals looked like to the uninitiated.  Even today, you'll hear people say that the originals looked all low-res and dirty like the GOUT, that the Special Editions fixed all of that, and that the originals simply aren't worth an HD release!

In summary, the purists remember the period from 1977-1997 when it was possible to watch the OT in super-high-definition, compare it against today when your best officially sanctioned option is a crappy Laserdisc transfer from the early nineties with the wrong soundtrack, and we feel shafted.  Especially those of us with children.

Or, to put it even more succinctly, when Beverly Hills Chihuahua 3 beats the hell out of Star Wars in the visuals department, there's a problem.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Father Skywalker said:

ok. I apologize for the oh-so terrible-and tragic news that the entire world/country and president barack obama should know......

You'd better apologize to me, boy, else I knock the black off ya.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I first started to have problems with LucasFilm's "creative decisions" once it was announced that Hayden will be put into ROTJ. Not only did I hate his performance in AOTC (ROTS didn't come out yet), but it just seemed flat out disrespectful to Sebastian Shaw, who was always a part of this movie.

Some time later I stumbled across the X0 project website which interested me greatly and so I kept watching their progress there. Sadly, none arrived. By that time I did have rips of GOUT on my computer and acknowledged them as the versions that felt "more right" in respect to the original movies.

In 2008 I found out about the Phantom Edit and it raised my interest to the point that I wanted to check it out. That led me to this website of which I have been a member ever since, although I have been only lurking for quite some time. I like it here, the community is great and there is so much interesting stuff going on :)

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Father Skywalker said:

TV's Frink said:

The topic is when/why you became a purist.  You are not one.  Get out.

ok. I apologize for the oh-so terrible-and tragic news that the entire world/country and president barack obama should know about that I acidentally went off topic on an internet forum website that 7 billion people know about, I apologize for accidentally believing that writing about my disagreements with OT purists was somehow being on-topic and not off-topic.

You get out, bro......

I take a dim view of you talking to a respected member of this board like that.

I think you've confused me with Ric Olie. ;-)

Author
Time

I became an OT purist in 2004, following the purchase of the OT trilogy on DVD.  Being a massive Star Wars fan, I bought into all the hype at the time and got the 2004 SEs along with the masses. After getting home and watching all three films through, however, something dawned on me... this was it. This was THE version of Star Wars I was being given to watch by Lucasfilm instead of the original films I grew up with and loved.

It was then that I started looking around the internet for others who felt like I did.  I stumbled across this site, joined, and signed the petition.  I then came across my first Laserdisc preservation (Dr. G's set) and realized that this place was totally for me.

“It’s a lot of fun… it’s a lot of fun to watch Star Wars.” – Bill Moyers

Author
Time

I became a purist very early on, around 2001.  I grew up watching and re-watching the THX original versions in full-screen, and I was concerned because I had read that George Lucas would never release the original versions again and I wanted to get a widescreen version on laserdisc before they became impossible to find.  I thought that widescreen VHS would be OK too, as long as I could digitize them. 

I found a VHS copy of the widescreen Faces set from a store that posted their catalog and new acquisitions online (I don't remember what the name was).  It was about $33 for the entire set in new condition (some shrink wrap was missing but that was it). 

But I wanted more- I knew the laserdisc versions would be better quality.  I was on prillaman's site a lot, reading about the DVD bootlegs and etc.  They all looked good for different reasons (TR47 had the uncompressed soundtrack, Dr. Gonzo was anamorphic, another version had isolated score).

In 2005 I found this site. 

I actually don't think I've ever seen the Special Edition trilogy all the way through, back to back (97, 04, or the new blu-rays).  It was obviously inferior and it ruined the pacing. 

Episode II: Shroud of the Dark Side

Emperor Jar-Jar
“Back when we made Star Wars, we just couldn’t make Palpatine as evil as we intended. Now, thanks to the miracles of technology, it is finally possible. Finally, I’ve created the movies that I originally imagined.” -George Lucas on the 2007 Extra Extra Special HD-DVD Edition

Author
Time

I may have been lurking before 2005.  I just cannot remember.

Episode II: Shroud of the Dark Side

Emperor Jar-Jar
“Back when we made Star Wars, we just couldn’t make Palpatine as evil as we intended. Now, thanks to the miracles of technology, it is finally possible. Finally, I’ve created the movies that I originally imagined.” -George Lucas on the 2007 Extra Extra Special HD-DVD Edition

Author
Time

I too became a purist around 2004. I really liked the 1997 special editions ( apart from a few changes) because they were just that; Special Editions. A fun ALTERNATIVE. When the DVD set came out and George announced that these are the only versions of the OT that exist, i grew to dislike them. If he wanted to fix the so called flaws then why didn't he just do that, instead of adding all this pointless crap, like adding Hayden at the end of Jedi, who looks like he is about to butt rape the Ewoks. With George saying that these are the only versions it was a huge "F**k You" to all the original fans that gave him everything he now had and had remained loyal throughout the wilderness years where there was not much Star Wars anything. The final nail in the coffin for me was when the blu-ray set came out and even more questionable changes were added. I can no longer watch those versions. The DVD & Blu-Ray versions just don't exist to me.

If you are going to do a Special Edition, then do it properly, but just keep it as precisely that; a special edition.  At least give some respect to the fans that gave you everything and respect that they [refer the original versions.

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA