logo Sign In

What would Darth Vader have been like as a ruler, if he had overthrown emperor palpatine and became the emperor/ruler of the galaxy himself?? — Page 2

Author
Time

Well, at the time Anakin was becoming Vader, one of the Death Stars was already under construction, and if you take the EU into account, there was already a prototype completed at The Maw, so he would have had access to those right off the bat at very least.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

Father Skywalker said:

TheBoost said:

nightstalkerpoet said:

Vader would have plunged the galaxy into unending civil war, with a constant disregard to individual planetary sovereigns. Rebellions would rise to fight the Empire, but Vader's total lack of guilt for murder would make it impossible for compassionate people to win, especially diplomatically. Vader would be a black hole, enveloping ever star system and galaxy possible. Considering his origins, he needs a continuing driving force to maintain his evil. Without it, I think he would fall into a deep depression and be usurped by those working under him.

 Totally afree.

I think the long term escalation of Vader's need to oppress and destroy his enemies as his hatred and evil grows would have eventually led Vader, in his older age, to want something like a Death Star.

Like a junkie, he'd eventually need that level of sheer, near omnipotent evil, to get his fix.

Opressing and destroying your enemies is not evil, if your enemies just happened to be armed wartime rebels, who are traitors that are commiting treason against the state.....

 

 Gotta disagree with you there. As a rule, oppressing people is bad. And since Vader is end-all-be-all evil (even by his own definitions) then his enemies are more often than not going to be justified in their resistance to them.

And while yes, there is the difficult line where one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter (go Red Dawn!), in this post Enlightenment era I think we can agree that a fascist dictatorship headed by DARTH F)(&)$#G VADER doesn't exactly have the mandate of heaven.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TheBoost said:

...one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter (go Red Dawn!)...

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TheBoost said:

Father Skywalker said:

TheBoost said:

nightstalkerpoet said:

Vader would have plunged the galaxy into unending civil war, with a constant disregard to individual planetary sovereigns. Rebellions would rise to fight the Empire, but Vader's total lack of guilt for murder would make it impossible for compassionate people to win, especially diplomatically. Vader would be a black hole, enveloping ever star system and galaxy possible. Considering his origins, he needs a continuing driving force to maintain his evil. Without it, I think he would fall into a deep depression and be usurped by those working under him.

 Totally afree.

I think the long term escalation of Vader's need to oppress and destroy his enemies as his hatred and evil grows would have eventually led Vader, in his older age, to want something like a Death Star.

Like a junkie, he'd eventually need that level of sheer, near omnipotent evil, to get his fix.

Opressing and destroying your enemies is not evil, if your enemies just happened to be armed wartime rebels, who are traitors that are commiting treason against the state.....

 

 Gotta disagree with you there. As a rule, oppressing people is bad. And since Vader is end-all-be-all evil (even by his own definitions) then his enemies are more often than not going to be justified in their resistance to them.

And while yes, there is the difficult line where one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter (go Red Dawn!), in this post Enlightenment era I think we can agree that a fascist dictatorship headed by DARTH F)(&)$#G VADER doesn't exactly have the mandate of heaven.

Gotta agree and disagree with you at the same time here. Yes, one man's terrorist and evil hated enemy dictator tyrant sicko is another man's hero, freedom fighter, and savior figure, that's is a very interesting observation there.....

For instance, let's take a good look at what happened in during/WW2. The Allied Powers defeated Adolf Hitler, the Third Reich, Nazism, Nazi Germany, the evil xenophobic racist Japanese Empire (a very little known fact about imperial japan during the second  world war, they were evil bastards who killed innocent people and civilians in China and other countries-for instance, unit 731, it's is a Slayer song, but it's is also a horrible torture chamber human experimentation done by imperial Japan).....

So, we defeated 2 of the most evil groups of people in all of history, and saved possibly, almost most certainly and definitley true, tens of millions of innocent lives from evil mass murderers. Regardless of the fact that the allied powers contained an evil mass murderer, Joesph Stalin, and some may have estimated that the soviet union atrocity body count may have even surpassed that of nazi germany, in the long run, without the soviet union, tens of millions of more innocent people would have died in genocide and ethnic cleansing. The Stalinist soviet union did most of it's atrocities and purges before the 3rd reich ever came to power, and most of joseph stalin's atrocities were done and over with, as opposed to the nazis, who were a real threat that had to be stopped and defeated.....

I have no doubt whatsoever that the Allied troops were heroic soldiers who sacrificed their lives and their sacrifice had helped to defend and protect the innocent people.... Sure, they may have fought during the war and yes, many military soldiers on both sides died, but it was to defeat evil. Defeating evil people is worth it, and it's is basically fighting for freedom and peace and justice and security in this world. War is terrible, especially if it involves drafted and conscripted troops, but sometimes, war is nessecary. WW2 saved tens of millions of lives. 

Anybody that calls the allied powers "terrorists" or "bad guys" needs to go see the nearest doctor possible and get a mental evaluation.....

Back on the main topic of this thread, Darth Vader being evil. I mean, come on really??? Darth Vader was absolutley nothing compared to the many infamous tyrants and dictators of this world. Think of it this way. Sure, he may have helped the Emperor to kill some Jedis, during Order 66, Operation Knightfall, aka the Great Jedi Purge..... But, in a galaxy filled with quadrillions of citizens, would he have really been that bad of a ruler???

The destruction of Alderaan and Despayre were nothing on a galactic scale with such a ginormous huge big population like that, they were maybe only about a few thousand people from earth filled with somewhere between 6-7 billion people, a few billion people in a galaxy with quadrillions living in it??

Other than that, would the rise and fall of the empire have really affected the average joe??? the jedi purge was done and over with, something that had happened in the past......

Because the entire premise of star wars is that the rebellion alliance is waging a just war to defeat evil right??

Well, the galactic sith empires that existed even before the prequel didn't have any death stars, but they were still evil and tyrannical dictators; samuel L jackson said, "the opression of the sith will never return", implying something that the movies never really specified, but the EU probably does........

Author
Time

Gomu69 said:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-rP5iqx6T8

Not sure if I would want to see that happen...

I find it very hard/difficult to imagine, and yet very kicass and awesome at the same time, the super-hot good looking Hayden Christensen as the young Emperor Darth Vader, hanging out with the imperial officers and admirals and the stormtroopers, ordering the death star to be fired upon alderaan and torturing princess leia....

Author
Time

Father Skywalker said:

Gomu69 said:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-rP5iqx6T8

Not sure if I would want to see that happen...

...the super-hot good looking Hayden Christensen...

Why does this matter so much to you?

 

Also, I never thought the acting could be worse in the prequels, but the acting in that clip from the game was so much worse than anything in the films. Holy crap.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

Father Skywalker said:

Gomu69 said:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-rP5iqx6T8

Not sure if I would want to see that happen...

...the super-hot good looking Hayden Christensen...

Why does this matter so much to you?

 

Also, I never thought the acting could be worse in the prequels, but the acting in that clip from the game was so much worse than anything in the films. Holy crap.

Can we just get back on topic and discuss the title of this thread???

Author
Time

I've never seen anyone go off-topic as much as you, and I've seen the Off-Topic section of this site leak out onto here a hundred times. I would argue that in a thread about Darth Vader, Hayden Christensen is on-topic.

You very consistently and constantly bring up his apparent hot-ness as if it were the only thing that mattered about him; not his skill at acting or his fit in the role of Anakin, but the length of his hair and his looks are all very important to you and I wonder why you go that route over his skill as an actor.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

Father Skywalker said:

Can we just get back on topic and discuss the title of this thread???

Sure.

I think it is a decent title. A bit too long, with at least one too many question marks, but hey, you don't see this kind of titles here nowadays. I give it 3 out od 4.

Author
Time

Father Skywalker said:

 

 

 

 

...For instance, let's take a good look at what happened in during/WW2. The Allied Powers defeated Adolf Hitler, the Third Reich, Nazism, Nazi Germany, the evil xenophobic racist Japanese Empire (a very little known fact about imperial japan during the second  world war, they were evil bastards who killed innocent people and civilians in China and other countries-for instance, unit 731, it's is a Slayer song, but it's is also a horrible torture chamber human experimentation done by imperial Japan).....

So, we defeated 2 of the most evil groups of people in all of history, and saved possibly, almost most certainly and definitley true, tens of millions of innocent lives from evil mass murderers. Regardless of the fact that the allied powers contained an evil mass murderer, Joesph Stalin, and some may have estimated that the soviet union atrocity body count may have even surpassed that of nazi germany, in the long run, without the soviet union, tens of millions of more innocent people would have died in genocide and ethnic cleansing. The Stalinist soviet union did most of it's atrocities and purges before the 3rd reich ever came to power, and most of joseph stalin's atrocities were done and over with, as opposed to the nazis, who were a real threat that had to be stopped and defeated.....

         Anyone who thinks that the Soviet Union, IF UNOPPOSED by the U.S. nation ruled by the U.S. Constitution, would have been any better and not worse than Stalin in the thirties needs to carefully read Orwell's 1984 AT LEAST A DOZEN TIMES.

        Most of those killed in Europe in WWII were killed by Soviet brutality and disregard for life. The Soviets were utterly exhausted from all their genocides and purges in the '20s and '30s and stupid and evil sacrifices of lives in the war. They had NO CHOICE but to moderate in order to meet the VAST moral and technical superiority of the U.S..

        Orwell's entire point was that TOTALITARIANS, regardless of the particulars of their respective doctrines, are exactly the same in basic mentality and goals. They will continue to amass greater and greater power, over every single aspect of human existence, ad infinitum. It's what they are all about. Any suggestion otherwise is only to fool people. They don't HONESTLY recognize ANY upper limits to what they take from others. For every inch they gain they will be right back for another mile........... 

        If VADER was a totalitarian, he would have kept going and going and going.......... 

      

Author
Time

Wexter said:

Father Skywalker said:

Can we just get back on topic and discuss the title of this thread???

Sure.

I think it is a decent title. A bit too long, with at least one too many question marks, but hey, you don't see this kind of titles here nowadays. I give it 3 out od 4.

Darn, beat me to it.

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

I've never seen anyone go off-topic as much as you, and I've seen the Off-Topic section of this site leak out onto here a hundred times. I would argue that in a thread about Darth Vader, Hayden Christensen is on-topic.

You very consistently and constantly bring up his apparent hot-ness as if it were the only thing that mattered about him; not his skill at acting or his fit in the role of Anakin, but the length of his hair and his looks are all very important to you and I wonder why you go that route over his skill as an actor.

It aint just his super hotness and good handsome looks, I mean that's is a very big part of it, but there are other factors. His acting, I mean, lets forget about looks for a minute, was pretty good too. I mean, the Mustafar scenes were just plain awesome, when young Lord Vader slaughtered the entire Seperatist council, that creepy evil look on his face when he walked in the hallways on Mustafar to find them, his last scene ever with Padme "I have brought peace to the republic. I am more powerful than the Chancellor, i can overthrow him!! And, together you and I can rule the galaxy, make things the way we want them to be". "I have brought peace, freedom, justice, and security to my new empire"!!!!!

Besides, he just looked perfect for young Darth Vader, pre-robot suit. I mean, people are just too freaked out to put Darth Vader on the top list of good-looking men, but really!!!!! Darth Vader's true face and body is (A), hidden inside of an armory samurai robot suit, kinda like how robert downey jr's face is hidden inside of the Iron Man suit, so the look of his suit and helmet is totally irrelevant to what's underneath it, think of it like the medieval knights almost, and, that 

This guy

 

Is obviously a middle aged, disfigured, burned, pale-white skinned, bald man. He was once a young and healthy looking man, and even before the prequels came out, it was established that he was disfigured and became a bald white skinned cyborg in an armory life support suit. So, that egg-looking face that you see right there could have easily been a guy like this

 

Who was terribly disfigured and burned in a volcano and eventually his skin turned white from being trapped inside of a helmet and not getting any sunlight. 

Was put inside of a black samurai suit of armor

That was a shell of his true face-look above and notice the difference between cyborg Vader and normal Vader, just a helmet like the medieval knights used to wear. Nothing in the original films gave us even a slight hint about his physical appearence.....

It isn't just good looks and hotness, it's is also that he looked the part......

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

I've never seen anyone go off-topic as much as you, and I've seen the Off-Topic section of this site leak out onto here a hundred times. I would argue that in a thread about Darth Vader, Hayden Christensen is on-topic.

You very consistently and constantly bring up his apparent hot-ness as if it were the only thing that mattered about him; not his skill at acting or his fit in the role of Anakin, but the length of his hair and his looks are all very important to you and I wonder why you go that route over his skill as an actor.

It aint just his super hotness and good handsome looks, I mean that's is a very big part of it, but there are other factors. His acting, I mean, lets forget about looks for a minute, was pretty good too. I mean, the Mustafar scenes were just plain awesome, when young Lord Vader slaughtered the entire Seperatist council, that creepy evil look on his face when he walked in the hallways on Mustafar to find them, his last scene ever with Padme "I have brought peace to the republic. I am more powerful than the Chancellor, i can overthrow him!! And, together you and I can rule the galaxy, make things the way we want them to be". "I have brought peace, freedom, justice, and security to my new empire"!!!!!

Besides, he just looked perfect for young Darth Vader, pre-robot suit. I mean, people are just too freaked out to put Darth Vader on the top list of good-looking men, but really!!!!! Darth Vader's true face and body is (A), hidden inside of an armory samurai robot suit, kinda like how robert downey jr's face is hidden inside of the Iron Man suit, so the look of his suit and helmet is totally irrelevant to what's underneath it, think of it like the medieval knights almost, and, that 

This guy

 

Is obviously a middle aged, disfigured, burned, pale-white skinned, bald man. He was once a young and healthy looking man, and even before the prequels came out, it was established that he was disfigured and became a bald white skinned cyborg in an armory life support suit. So, that egg-looking face that you see right there could have easily been a guy like this

 

Who was terribly disfigured and burned in a volcano and eventually his skin turned white from being trapped inside of a helmet and not getting any sunlight. 

Was put inside of a black samurai suit of armor

That was a shell of his true face-look above and notice the difference between cyborg Vader and normal Vader, just a helmet like the medieval knights used to wear. Nothing in the original films gave us even a slight hint about his physical appearence.....

It isn't just good looks and hotness, it's is also that he looked the part......

Author
Time

thejediknighthusezni said:

Father Skywalker said:

 

 

 

 

...For instance, let's take a good look at what happened in during/WW2. The Allied Powers defeated Adolf Hitler, the Third Reich, Nazism, Nazi Germany, the evil xenophobic racist Japanese Empire (a very little known fact about imperial japan during the second  world war, they were evil bastards who killed innocent people and civilians in China and other countries-for instance, unit 731, it's is a Slayer song, but it's is also a horrible torture chamber human experimentation done by imperial Japan).....

So, we defeated 2 of the most evil groups of people in all of history, and saved possibly, almost most certainly and definitley true, tens of millions of innocent lives from evil mass murderers. Regardless of the fact that the allied powers contained an evil mass murderer, Joesph Stalin, and some may have estimated that the soviet union atrocity body count may have even surpassed that of nazi germany, in the long run, without the soviet union, tens of millions of more innocent people would have died in genocide and ethnic cleansing. The Stalinist soviet union did most of it's atrocities and purges before the 3rd reich ever came to power, and most of joseph stalin's atrocities were done and over with, as opposed to the nazis, who were a real threat that had to be stopped and defeated.....

         Anyone who thinks that the Soviet Union, IF UNOPPOSED by the U.S. nation ruled by the U.S. Constitution, would have been any better and not worse than Stalin in the thirties needs to carefully read Orwell's 1984 AT LEAST A DOZEN TIMES.

        Most of those killed in Europe in WWII were killed by Soviet brutality and disregard for life. The Soviets were utterly exhausted from all their genocides and purges in the '20s and '30s and stupid and evil sacrifices of lives in the war. They had NO CHOICE but to moderate in order to meet the VAST moral and technical superiority of the U.S..

        Orwell's entire point was that TOTALITARIANS, regardless of the particulars of their respective doctrines, are exactly the same in basic mentality and goals. They will continue to amass greater and greater power, over every single aspect of human existence, ad infinitum. It's what they are all about. Any suggestion otherwise is only to fool people. They don't HONESTLY recognize ANY upper limits to what they take from others. For every inch they gain they will be right back for another mile........... 

        If VADER was a totalitarian, he would have kept going and going and going.......... 

 

If Adolf Hitler was never defeated, then the Nazis would've killed tens of millions of more people. The Soviet union body count was mostly done and over with, it happened during the 20s and the 30s. The Nazis, on the other hand, were just getting started. 6-12 million people died under their genocide, and, without the Soviet Union, probably something like 40-50 million at the very least would've died. The Soviets may have killed tens of millions, but that was done and over with. In the long run, we had to team up with the mass murdering Soviets to prevent even more mass murder from Nazi Germany in the long run.

In the long run Nazi germany was a far bigger threat than the soviet union. Know your facts.......

If Darth Vader was the galactic sith emperor, he would've only tried to defend himself from armed wartime rebel traitors, which is not tyrannical or evil. Would he have done anything that affected the average joe living in the empire??? No. If i'm wrong, which I probably might be, im willing to hear why...

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

BTW, how's the weather in Trenton tonight? ;)

Darth Vader would have been an enlightened despost/benevolent dictator.....

He would use his armies to defeat the rebellion alliance, who are armed criminals commiting treason from his POV...

The quadrillions of imperial citizens would be happy and totally unaffected by his rule...

 

Author
Time

Answer the question...

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Answer the question...

What question??? how the hell/heck would I know the weather in Toronto??

Author
Time

That's what I thought, Lord Tyrannus. ;)

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

That's what I thought, Lord Tyrannus. ;)

Why R u calling me Lord Tyrannus???

Author
Time

Isn't that the name you used at the Jedi Council forums? Their posts over there, (and the anonymous fellow at Wookiepedia) are very similar to yours...

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Isn't that the name you used at the Jedi Council forums? Their posts over there, (and the anonymous fellow at Wookiepedia) are very similar to yours...

What Do U mean by "very similar"???? 

Be more specific, please.......

R U from wookipedia???

I was unfairly banned from the jedi council forums, false accusations of trolling......

Author
Time

Your posts there speak for themselves...

Are New Jersey winters still as bad as I remember?

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Your posts there speak for themselves...

Are New Jersey winters still as bad as I remember?

R U on the jedi council forums???