logo Sign In

What didn't you like about TFA? SPOILERS — Page 16

Author
Time
 (Edited)

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

An OT “junky” who referred to Obi’s hut as a cave? Interesting.

It is never named in the film. So for a purist cave, hut or house is all the same. I actually like cave. It is kinda romantic. 😃

Well then I’ll just start calling Star Destroyers “caves” because that’s equally stupid, named or not.

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Bosk said:

I was astounded at the lack of originality, people slate Jedi as a ANH clone, at least it was a good effort in comparison to this abortion.

FYI, you shouldn’t use the “A” word so casually around Frink.

Arsehole?

Author
Time

Bosk said:

TV’s Frink said:

An OT “junky” who referred to Obi’s hut as a cave? Interesting.

Sad you had to pick up on that, his house then FFS

It’s called “paying attention,” which I know is hard to do in this thread.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Bosk said:

TV’s Frink said:

An OT “junky” who referred to Obi’s hut as a cave? Interesting.

Sad you had to pick up on that, his house then FFS

It’s called “paying attention,” which I know is hard to do in this thread.

And everyone should yield to your shite posts, for the record it’s called a film, not a movie.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

An OT “junky” who referred to Obi’s hut as a cave? Interesting.

It is never named in the film. So for a purist cave, hut or house is all the same. I actually like cave. It is kinda romantic. 😃

Well then I’ll just start calling Star Destroyers “caves” because that’s equally stupid, named or not.

By all means, go ahead. Though it will not be as romantic.

真実

Author
Time

Yes, the difference between film and movie is exactly the same as between cave and hut.

I hope that wasn’t on your SAT test.

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

An OT “junky” who referred to Obi’s hut as a cave? Interesting.

It is never named in the film. So for a purist cave, hut or house is all the same. I actually like cave. It is kinda romantic. 😃

Well then I’ll just start calling Star Destroyers “caves” because that’s equally stupid, named or not.

By all means, go ahead. Though it will not be as romantic.

Stupid love is still stupid.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Yes, the difference between film and movie is exactly the same as between cave and hut.

I hope that wasn’t on your SAT test.

Sat test? We didn’t have them when I was a lad pal, an American cultural imperialist introduction in 1991! Judging by your contradictive comment you must be well educated.

Author
Time

SAT what? We don’t seem to have that in civilised world.

真実

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

hydrospanner said:

They did introduce new characters and there was no way they were making a sequel trilogy that omitted all the characters from the OT. Why even bother making an episode VII if it isn’t going to have any relation to the previous installments?

I can only imagine the complaints in this thread if there were no old characters.

Agreed…I was most pleased at their appearances…one of the few things I actually enjoyed… 😉

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Also, fuck you for comparing a movie to an abortion. I don’t care if the dictionary definition technically supports your using it, it’s not right. No better than people bitching about Lucas raping anything.

Lucas raped star wars when he did the special editions and prequels they were proper abortion movies, especially the new cave they made for OB1 out of CGI, the color was all wrong. j/k

I’m not clairvoyant, it’s a term often used to describe something rubbish in the UK. I don’t know what your issue is with these words but tbh I don’t care , this is about Star wars, not YOU!

Author
Time

Post Praetorian said:

TV’s Frink said:

hydrospanner said:

They did introduce new characters and there was no way they were making a sequel trilogy that omitted all the characters from the OT. Why even bother making an episode VII if it isn’t going to have any relation to the previous installments?

I can only imagine the complaints in this thread if there were no old characters.

Agreed…I was most pleased at their appearances…one of the few things I actually enjoyed… 😉

I only enjoyed hearing the opening score and Luke’s theme again in a Cinema, all be it the latter supporting the wrong character? Surely it would have been a better finish to the film if we had heard Luke’s theme when he was finally shown on screen and had him do some pensive stare over the cliffs with rey stood behind, not her holding out the light sabre for ten minutes.

Author
Time

Bosk said:

Post Praetorian said:

TV’s Frink said:

hydrospanner said:

They did introduce new characters and there was no way they were making a sequel trilogy that omitted all the characters from the OT. Why even bother making an episode VII if it isn’t going to have any relation to the previous installments?

I can only imagine the complaints in this thread if there were no old characters.

Agreed…I was most pleased at their appearances…one of the few things I actually enjoyed… 😉

I only enjoyed hearing the opening score and Luke’s theme again in a Cinema, all be it the latter supporting the wrong character? Surely it would have been a better finish to the film if we had heard Luke’s theme when he was finally shown on screen and had him do some pensive stare over the cliffs with rey stood behind, not her holding out the light sabre for ten minutes.

It is here that I humbly admit to clearly not being a terribly observant SW fan…as until recently I had not even considered certain music to be associated with particular characters…<sigh>

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

Bosk said:

How anyone could say this was a “fan’s film” or “the fans will like it” is beyond me. They must have been referring to prequel/SE fans. I consider myself a real fan of the Out and to me Tfa was an epic fail!

Speak for yourself. I’m certainly not a SE/PT fan and i loved this film. I know many people who only like the unaltered versions, like myself, and hate the PT, but loved TFA. It certainly WAS a “fan’s film”. It brought a LOT of people back into the fandom that had given up after the SE/PT.

Bosk said:

TV’s Frink said:

Also, fuck you for comparing a movie to an abortion. I don’t care if the dictionary definition technically supports your using it, it’s not right. No better than people bitching about Lucas raping anything.

Lucas raped star wars when he did the special editions and prequels they were proper abortion movies, especially the new cave they made for OB1 out of CGI, the color was all wrong. j/k

I’m not clairvoyant, it’s a term often used to describe something rubbish in the UK. I don’t know what your issue is with these words but tbh I don’t care , this is about Star wars, not YOU!

Where in the UK are you then? It’s certainly NOT a term often used to describe something rubbish anywhere i have lived in the UK.

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Can’t we all just get a foot long?

Hard when every post is heckled on the “What didn’t you like about TFA?” thread. If you liked it, what are you posting in here for? Trying to convince yourself (and those that dislike it) it is a good film, when the reality is unfortunately, it is nothing more than a collage and pastiche, retro and supposedly nostalgic film.

Author
Time

adywan said:

Bosk said:

How anyone could say this was a “fan’s film” or “the fans will like it” is beyond me. They must have been referring to prequel/SE fans. I consider myself a real fan of the Out and to me Tfa was an epic fail!

Speak for yourself. I’m certainly not a SE/PT fan and i loved this film. I know many people who only like the unaltered versions, like myself, and hate the PT, but loved TFA. It certainly WAS a “fan’s film”. It brought a LOT of people back into the fandom that had given up after the SE/PT.

Bosk said:

TV’s Frink said:

Also, fuck you for comparing a movie to an abortion. I don’t care if the dictionary definition technically supports your using it, it’s not right. No better than people bitching about Lucas raping anything.

Lucas raped star wars when he did the special editions and prequels they were proper abortion movies, especially the new cave they made for OB1 out of CGI, the color was all wrong. j/k

I’m not clairvoyant, it’s a term often used to describe something rubbish in the UK. I don’t know what your issue is with these words but tbh I don’t care , this is about Star wars, not YOU!

Where in the UK are you then? It’s certainly NOT a term often used to describe something rubbish anywhere i have lived in the UK.

You haven’t lived in the north then 😉

Author
Time

Bosk said:

TV’s Frink said:

Also, fuck you for comparing a movie to an abortion. I don’t care if the dictionary definition technically supports your using it, it’s not right. No better than people bitching about Lucas raping anything.

Lucas raped star wars when he did the special editions and prequels they were proper abortion movies, especially the new cave they made for OB1 out of CGI, the color was all wrong. j/k

I’m not clairvoyant, it’s a term often used to describe something rubbish in the UK. I don’t know what your issue is with these words but tbh I don’t care , this is about Star wars, not YOU!

Words mean things. You can disagree with me but you don’t need to be an asshole.

Author
Time

Bosk said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Can’t we all just get a foot long?

Hard when every post is heckled on the “What didn’t you like about TFA?” thread. If you liked it, what are you posting in here for? Trying to convince yourself (and those that dislike it) it is a good film, when the reality is unfortunately, it is nothing more than a collage and pastiche, retro and supposedly nostalgic film.

I wasn’t aware disagreement was discouraged here. Since you know so much about this place, maybe you can educate me.

There are plenty of anti-TFA posts I don’t mock, because they make sense (even if I don’t agree with them). But I don’t ignore bullshit, I mock it.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Bosk said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Can’t we all just get a foot long?

Hard when every post is heckled on the “What didn’t you like about TFA?” thread. If you liked it, what are you posting in here for? Trying to convince yourself (and those that dislike it) it is a good film, when the reality is unfortunately, it is nothing more than a collage and pastiche, retro and supposedly nostalgic film.

I wasn’t aware disagreement was discouraged here. Since you know so much about this place, maybe you can educate me.

There are plenty of anti-TFA posts I don’t mock, because they make sense (even if I don’t agree with them). But I don’t ignore bullshit, I mock it.

Here he is the man who said “don’t bump this thread” Bullshit is subjective.

Author
Time

Link please. I’m sure I said it but context is important.

Author
Time

Are you a ten-year-old, or am I giving you too much credit?

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Are you a ten-year-old, or am I giving you too much credit?

I thought it was amusing or can’t you take a joke or find your own posts?