RedFive said:
Tyrphanax said: ....
Also, J.R.R. Tolkien is an awful writer.
First of all, I like that no one even felt the need to refute this unbelievable statement.
Whoa! I somehow missed that comment. I will refute it to hell and back, and then all over again. Unbelievable is right! Tolkien is brilliant! I love the way he writes, as have countless others, as evident by the popularity of the books since they were first published.
But it seems most people queef eloquent on the greatness of Stephen King's writing, and yet I've never managed to make it more than a few chapters into one of his books before wanted to beat my own head in with a blunt object. While unquestionably bad writing exists, once you get into the realm of decent to fantastic writing, it becomes very much subject to the reader's tastes.
darth_ender said:
I finished this one, and I do like it, but...I think my biggest problem with it was the lack of a real overarching conflict. The whole thing that ties it together is silly Reepicheep (who had some good lines) wanting to prove his valor by going as far east as he could. It seemed like nothing more than a bunch of subplots. But for what it was, in the end I liked it better than I expected.
You're right, it [The Voyage of the Dawn Treader] is a travelogue with episodic events taking place, rather than having a solid main story arch. That is possibly one of the things I have always really loved so much about it. Reading it at a very young age, it was very imagination inspiring. It made me want to want to go on my own adventures through strange lands (and amusingly enough, I actually made a career of doing just that, for a short while). The idea of stepping through a wardrobe into another world was the only other concept in any of the other Narnia books that excited me anywhere near as much as the things that happen in Voyage. I admit, some of the things in that book are rather silly, but as a kid I didn't really see that.