logo Sign In

Was Tarkin the main villain in Star Wars? — Page 2

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

Any thread that helps me see the movie from Anchorhead's perspective is a plus in my book.

Ah, man, don't put that on me.  ;-)  

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

The officers higher ranked than Vader were all on the Death Star. Subsequently taken to death in the explosion. See what happened was that they wanted coffee. The Death Star was equipped with the top of the line coffee shop. Best EVAR!!! Urns high praise. (Just don't walk in with any life preservers) Anyway the whole chase after the rebels thing happened, they were busy watching a movie in the cineplex, boom death star blew up. They thought they were safe considering they were on a starship that could obliterate an entire planet, all the security personnel around to protect them, and whatnot....


(Stuff I just made up w/out thinking too much about it. Enjoy!http://img859.imageshack.us/img859/1693/happyx.gif )


http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/7405/cooly.gif

http://twister111.tumblr.com
Previous Signature preservation link

Author
Time

I will say, however;  Even though she's goofing, Twister brings up an interesting angle.  Several high ranking officers were all killed at the end of Star Wars.  You could use that as an angle for Vader's sudden increase in rank and power. Personally, I don't think Lucas put that much thought into the story.  Depth of story has never been a huge concern or strength of his.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

I think the sequels to Star Wars (1977) were both a response to analysis of it's success.

ESB is pretty much a condensation of what made the story work and ROTJ is a condensation of what made the film financially successful.

One is a plot and character driven, the other is driven by action and resolution.

As a closed unit the first film has all these things.

I suspect that one of the reasons why in an age where films can be re-watched with ease, ESB is usually more of a hit because plot and character nuances take more time to digest, where as a simple roller coaster can be habituated by a viewer more quickly. 

Author
Time

I always thought of the Vader-Tarkin relationship as being similar to when the CEO of a company makes his son the administrative assistant of the President. Tarkin is technically Vader's boss, but Vader is the Emperor's favorite pet, so the "leash" is long and very loosely held.

Author
Time

Twisters theory is actually pretty cool :)

tarkin probably have had more governing responsibilities. but as far as hidden power and, more importantly, from a cinematic perspective vader was the main villain.  Forget the force powers, the scary breathing and all the merchandising - He almost single-handedly took down the entire rebel assault on the death star (perhaps this was the first clue that anakin and vader were the same person). 

lucas in his 2004 DVD commentaries saying "vader was never supposed to be powerful villain, he was a pathetic character" disgusted me beyond belief.  i wasn't fooled (nor surprised) by this at all and knew right away that lucas' real reason for saying this was because he knew he botched the ressurection scene in episode III and was pre-emptively trying to spin it; knowing full well it was anticipated to be the climactic moment in the entire PT.  Its no different than all his other "well, it wasn't supposed to be this, it was meant to be that way all along" talking points.  lets see how many interviews prior to 1995 did lucas say "vader is a pathetic character! he's lame!! loser! limp! wimp!!".  and no, tragic is NOT the same as pathetic.

sadly, apologists on TFN bought into it and started turning over rocks trying to find things in the OT to justify it.  I mean, for cripes sake, he's a giant guy dressed in black and the camera shows a CLOESUP of him lifting someone off of the ground! lucas doesn't do multi-facted characters with ambiguities.  When you want a pathetic character, do you really want james frickin earl jones to do the voice!? 

In the end, I still liked the resurrection scene cuz...well, even lucas cant ruin vader.  and when that helmet came on - that was the kiler shot.  But as reports from sneak previews were pouring in about how bad this scene was, it didn't surprise me at all.  and lucas again blabbing on "he's pathetic! he's pathetic!!  nobody likes him!! palpatine is bummed out he has a broken down sidekick!! its supposed to be like this!! i had it planned exactly like this in 1977!!!"  um, yeah sure.  palpatine was so disspointed that he smiled when vader broke from his restraints.

[/rant over]  (do people still say '/rant over' ?)

anyway, was still cool seeing tarkin in episode III.  but the fact that he was just a cameo i think strengthens the argument that the empire ws palpatine first, vader second.

click here if lack of OOT got you down

Author
Time

If Lucas had been able to adapt Flash Gordon like he originally wanted, would Ming the Merciless be revealed to have had a lousy childhood or tragic past? ;)

Interesting thought I just had about Tarkin, does he know Vader is Anakin? I'm inclined to think so based on the dialog in the conference room.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:


Interesting thought I just had about Tarkin, does he know Vader is Anakin? I'm inclined to think so based on the dialog in the conference room.


He probably knew Vader was a Jedi who fell to the dark side. He may not have known his true identity, though.

Author
Time

He definitely doesn't know Vader is Anakin. Even Lucas didn't know when he wrote the conference room scene. But I gues he knew that a young Jedi named Darth Vader was a pupil of Obi-Wan before he turned to evil...

Author
Time

In the six part saga which is now called Star Wars Obi-Wan only ever had one pupil so as far as that collected text goes Tarkin must know Vader is Anakin.

Author
Time

Wexter said:

He definitely doesn't know Vader is Anakin....Lucas didn't know when he wrote the conference room scene.

To me, that's the single most important thing to keep at the front of all story discussions involving any Lucas-penned Star Wars.  The "saga" was written on the fly, so a great many things were simply not what they were changed to years later.

That's a detail that seems completely lost on other Star Wars boards.  I'm truly shocked at how many younger fans actually buy the Original Vision bullshit.  It's like they've completely taken leave of any actual thought.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

They're too young to know any better. ;)

Most of the media we grew up with that would celebrate and cover the saga, but also cast a critical eye at it are long defunct. And official Lucasfilm media outlets aren't going run anything remotely critical. I'm not sure how many younger fans get info from anything other than the net these days.

Guess what I should have said is, did Tarkin know Vader when he was a Jedi?

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Yeah, Lucas was such a brilliant director, that he was able to get the characters to act as if they had a particular backstory without their even knowing such a backstory existed.  In fact, he was such an insanely brilliant director, that he was able to get the characters to act as if they had a particular backstory without even HE knowing such a backstory existed!  The greatest, most subtle and ingenious mind in the history of all time!

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook

Guess what I should have said is, did Tarkin know Vader when he was a Jedi?

 Wait....what?  When was Tarkin ever a Jedi?

  j/k

Author
Time

I think a key point is in SW how Vader's subordinated treat him. While he's plainly the boss, they aren't afraid of him and are free to disagree and almost argue.

By ESB Vader's moved up in the world. He has a bigger ship, commands other ships, and NO ONE gives him instructions and you question him at your peril.

How much of this can be accounted by a change in Vader the person, and how much can be accounted by a change in Imperial power structure?

One possibility is that his discovery of having a son (and planning a father/son coup) has made him more motivated/aggressive.

The other possibility is that Vader's now "off the leash." He's plainly been promoted, either because of the power vacuum above him after the DS went boom, or because his apparent mandate of hunting down the Rebels has now become the main focus of the Imperial navy.

Since Vader had a rise in status between SW and Empire, what does this tell us about his relationship with Tarkin?

In SW when Vader choked the douchebag in the confrence scene, everyone is shocked and appalled. Plainly this isn't normal... the dude pushed Vader a little too hard. After Star Wars, everyone almost expects to be choked... even Moff Jerjerood in ROTJ. This seems to indicate that Vader wasn't in a position to go around choking people willy-nilly in SW and one is left to wonder what would have followed if he hadn't obeyed Tarkin's order to release him.

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

No, to me Vader was obviously the villain, he could choke people by putting his fingers  together!!!

Tarkin was his superior, a thinker....who got to his position by respect.....no-one in the boardroom would dare to speak to him the way that Motti did to Vader....Vader is a throw-back to an ancient religion....the force in the 'first film' was a more mystical ideal

J

Author
Time

Finally watching the Bast/Vader scene last week without HS dubbing, and that is actually a really cool scene.  It undermines Tarkin's authority to a great degree, and really would have affected my perspective had it been included in the final film.

Author
Time

darth_ender said:

Finally watching the Bast/Vader scene last week without HS dubbing, and that is actually a really cool scene.  It undermines Tarkin's authority to a great degree, and really would have affected my perspective had it been included in the final film.

 hmm...you mean this scene? not sure how it shows undermining - unless it just means vader is ignoring a request from tarkin to call off the search and he went ahead anyways

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nuHNBY9vMg

click here if lack of OOT got you down

Author
Time

That is the right scene with the wrong audio.  It was cut from the original film, then used in the Star Wars Holiday Special with new dubbing, which is what you have in that video there.  I will try to find the right audio for you.

Author
Time

darth_ender said:

That is the right scene with the wrong audio.  It was cut from the original film, then used in the Star Wars Holiday Special with new dubbing, which is what you have in that video there.  I will try to find the right audio for you.

 Found it (obviously flipped):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nG3tGmUeZA4

Author
Time

darth_ender said:

darth_ender said:

That is the right scene with the wrong audio.  It was cut from the original film, then used in the Star Wars Holiday Special with new dubbing, which is what you have in that video there.  I will try to find the right audio for you.

 Found it (obviously flipped):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nG3tGmUeZA4

 thanks

 

hmm....that is interesting.  normally i view cuts as 'out of sight out of mind'..but i sometimes make exceptions for character development (even if the guy was only in the movie for like a minute)

certainly doesn't care much for tarkin.  then again, maybe he was just trying to curry favor with vader.

[guffaws] man..now everytime i see that scene with tarkin scoffing at his suggestion for evacuation, im gonna picture in my mind that guy thinking "suit yourself, asshole" and then taking the ship for himself!! bwaahahahahaha 

click here if lack of OOT got you down

Author
Time

^Seriously!  It gives you a new perspective when he suggests the evacuation.  He's thinking the whole time that Tarkin is a moron.