logo Sign In

Ultimate Trilogy Set — Page 2

Author
Time

hairy_hen said:

captainsolo said:

SW: The 6 channels were done this way originally- Left, Center, Right, Mono surround and two baby booms on each side of the center channel. These only augmented the bass instead of being discrete. You essentially would just need a 4.0 channel mix and a sub to get the idea. If you added in two speakers you could recreate the full experience but this would necessitate a 6.0 mix or a 7.1 receiver where you could just turn on extra speakers as mirrors cut out the treble and place them accordingly.

ESB and ROTJ were done in stereo surround without the baby booms so this would be much easier.

Not so; in addition to augmenting the low end of the main channels, all three films had real LFE content in their 70mm releases.  This seems to be a point of confusion, but the research I've done on the topic indicates it to be the case, most particularly the remarks of THX engineer Tomlinson Holman (who incidentally is responsible for the adoption of 5.1 as the industry standard audio format).  Also, none of the movies ever had stereo surrounds originally.

In fact, the reason the second and fourth channels of 70mm magnetic sound were used for bass purposes in the first place was because that was the only way to achieve a 'thunderous low end' when the Star Destroyer first goes by overhead.  It's possible that it wasn't quite as loud as you'd expect of such things these days, true, what with subwoofers not yet being standard issue and headroom not quite as high as digital formats, but it was definitely there.  Even listening to a low-fi tape recording made at a 70mm screening the discrete bass content can sometimes be discerned as clearly distinct from the rest of the mix.

The augmented portions of the boom tracks would be a bit problematic for fitting into modern formats, particularly for the first movie since the low pass filter was first set at 250 hz, though by the time the other two came out that had been changed to 125 hz to avoid noticeable crosstalk with the main channels.  Dolby Digital only allows for LFE going up to 120 hz: a flat limit, not just a rolloff, in order to save bandwidth by taking advantage of the Nyquist frequency and only using a sample rate of 240 for the LFE.  In general mixing practice, it tends to be rolled off around 80 hz to avoid the upper limit, and is only used for discrete effects and never as a general crossover.  In making the 1993 mixes for the Definitive Collection laserdiscs, the boom tracks were deemed unsuitable because of these conditions, and the low end was instead added from separate sound effects masters as is the present custom.

So—the 70mm mixes cannot be presented exactly as they are in a remastering.  The LCRS main channels could simply be ported over directly, but the bass needs some care taken to achieve an optimal effect.  Either it would have to take the same path as the '93 mixes and be created over again, hopefully following the aesthetic of the original; or else the actual LFE content isolated from the boom tracks and summed together into one at a proper level.  Either way, the result would be a 4.1 mix with monaural surround, similar to what appears on the Bluray releases of Alien and Aliens.  (The fact that those include their 70mm audio shows that it can be done easily enough as long as proper care is taken.)

Ahh..I figured I was probably goofing up somewhere. Darned late night posts!

Hmm...everything I've read says it just enhanced the bass content...but it does make sense that people would actually try and create some added LFE content-especially with SW being the first Dolby 70mm presentation.

The 4.1 idea seems the most appropriate format to playback the 70mm mixes, but it would probably be better to add in a second sub to have two firing at you like the baby booms would have. Or maybe I just like big speakers..;)

Ioan Allen describes 70mm Dolby 6track development:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaXiJSofaMY&feature=related

 

What got me thinking about these again was the 5.1 mix of The Wild Bunch. It's a mix derived from the 6-track masters from the 70mm run, and only in a lossy ac3. I didn't know if it was originally made in ProLogic stereo or presented in 5.1 for the restoration. It's an odd mix that's primarily centered in the front with very little rear activity. Now I've got to try and find the original mono to compare the two.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Very few Dolby Six-Track mixes were done with stereo surrounds early on, Superman and Apocalypse Now were the first, why Empire and Jedi didn't utilize it I don't know.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

msycamore said:

LexX said:

But still, the video has been touched for some reason, even though Ridley Scott is usually a good preservationist.

What do you mean by touched? Are you talking about the "Director's Cut" or the new timing on the blu-ray that caused some controversy? Either way, when it comes to Ridley's films, there's always a choice and they are treated like films and not like some computer software.

EDIT: Started a thread about the Alien audio: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Dolby-Digital-41-Surround-Alien-Anthology/post/568250/#TopicPost568250 so that we don't derail this thread any further.

They fixed a hole in the floor and the colortiming was considered pretty bad as in not original. Haven't seen the film so I don't know that much about it. :P Unnecessary fixes just get on my nerve, LOL.

And in the time of greatest despair, there shall come a savior, and he shall be known as the Son of the Suns.

Author
Time

LexX said:

They fixed a hole in the floor and the colortiming was considered pretty bad as in not original. Haven't seen the film so I don't know that much about it. :P Unnecessary fixes just get on my nerve, LOL.

Yeah, I agree but you're confusing it with Cameron's Aliens. It was the sequel that was tweaked here and there when it was time for the blu-ray release.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

msycamore said:

LexX said:

They fixed a hole in the floor and the colortiming was considered pretty bad as in not original. Haven't seen the film so I don't know that much about it. :P Unnecessary fixes just get on my nerve, LOL.

Yeah, I agree but you're confusing it with Cameron's Aliens. It was the sequel that was tweaked here and there when it was time for the blu-ray release.

Oh, whoops! Got them mixed up, sorry.

And in the time of greatest despair, there shall come a savior, and he shall be known as the Son of the Suns.

Author
Time

thecolorsblend said:


I think a lot of that content is similar to the point of being redundant.
That's okay, I'm pretty sure a lot of this thread is redundant.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

 

thecolorsblend said:


I think a lot of that content is similar to the point of being redundant.
That's okay, I'm pretty sure a lot of this thread is redundant.

 

you mean like this comment? haha

later

-1

[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]