logo Sign In

The new Star Wars comics - a general discussion thread — Page 5

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

SilverWook said:

Sounds like the same sort of greedy speculation that pretty much ruined the hobby for many people in the 90's.

Which is why I have no respect for Marvel anymore. Gimmicks have come to be of greater importance to them than good writing. 

Who calls the shots at Marvel? Editor-in-chief? CEO?

Author
Time

New York, NY – December 16, 2014 – Next year, the original Marvel Comic adaptations of the iconic Star Wars trilogy return for new, oversized graphic novels with remastered coloring! It all starts this May as the first original comic adaptation of the greatest space-fantasy film of all time is reborn for the modern age as STAR WARS™: EPISODE IV A NEW HOPE makes it’s triumphant return to comic shops!

Weeks before George Lucas’ first STAR WARS film hit theatres, Marvel gave eager fans their very first look at Luke Skywalker, boldly asking “Will he save the galaxy, or destroy it?” Over 30 years later, you know the answer, but that doesn’t spoil the excitement of reliving this now classic adaptation like you’ve never seen it before – including scenes that never made it to the silver screen! Written by Roy Thomas with art by Howard Chaykin, this iconic story has been remastered for the modern age all-new coloring by Chris Sotomayor.

“When Star Wars took the world by storm in 1977, Marvel Comics was right there with exciting comic adaptations and new stories set in a galaxy far, far away,” says Marvel SVP Sales & Marketing David Gabriel. “With new Star Wars comics being published by Marvel in 2015, we’re proud to look back on this exciting remastered adaptation of the original film, with remastered adaptations of The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi coming later in 2015.”

Debuting in an oversized hardcover format with sophisticated packaging and a new cover by famed artist Adi Granov, relive the original Marvel Comics adventure of Luke, Han, Leia, Chewbacca, C-3PO, R2-D2 and the villainous Darth Vader again – or for the very first time. It’s six against an entire galaxy – one that’s far, far away and a long time ago!

May the Force be with you, and in the mighty Marvel manner this May when the remastered STAR WARS™: EPISODE IV A NEW HOPE OGN HC comes to comic shops and bookstores in 2015!

Source

Bleh.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

I dunno, I think it looks good. I've never liked the funny colours look that a lot of comics from that era have.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Sweet zombie Jebus! They're going to SE the original comics now? This is as bad as colorizing old movies. And I thought the Dark Horse reprints in the 90's had bad coloring.

Who wants to bet they "remaster" this scene? ;)

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Maybe they'll Photoshop regular jabba over that alien Marvel used. Its always interesting to see how dumb things can get when Star Wars, anal retentiveness, and greedy repackaging collide.

Author
Time

If Disney was behind this ill conceived bantha poodoo, it bodes ill for getting the OOT.

Do the Dark Horse omnibus volumes retain their original coloring?

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Maybe it's a good thing, it certainly shows they are willing to sell absolutely anything that can be sold. 

And hasn't Lucas spent years and millions of dollars trying to open a museum dedicated to the importance and significance of pop art? Maybe all the exhibits can be smeared with generic looking photoshop.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook said:

They're going to SE the original comics now? This is as bad as colorizing old movies.

 They kind of hinted at this back in November when they revealed the cover for one of their omnibus volumes that used the original line art from a cover but recolored it:

And I thought the Dark Horse reprints in the 90's had bad coloring.

To be fair, Dark Horse made up for that in the early 2000's when they came out with the A Long Time Ago... anthology reprints. They went to great lengths to try and recreate the comics original coloring. It wasn't absolutely perfect but it was very faithful.

I don't think I'll care for Marvel's new modernized recolorings but at least Dark Horse's compilations are still available for purchase.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

Provided this is like The Killing Joke where the original is still easily available in a different edition down the line (or now, considering I doubt the Dark Horse reprints are too hard to find right now) I don't really care.

Though I will say I am definitely, definitely not a fan. It's so bland looking that way.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

Baronlando said:

Maybe it's a good thing, it certainly shows they are willing to sell absolutely anything that can be sold. 

And hasn't Lucas spent years and millions of dollars trying to open a museum dedicated to the importance and significance of pop art? Maybe all the exhibits can be smeared with generic looking photoshop.

In the Episode 7 thread on the chud.com forums, two people were recently debating the likelihood of the OOT getting a restoration anytime soon.

One person said it's unlikely to happen while Lucas was still alive. Disney wouldn't want to upset their biggest shareholder and they'll be making too much money off of all the merch to even care about spending the time and money on a restoration just to please a relative handful of people out there.

The other person responded that Lucas was just paid a handsome sum of money in return for the franchise. Disney is going to maximize their profits, and the OOT would be very profitable. The question isn't "why should they," it's "why shouldn't they."

It's only becoming more and more shocking what they'll dig up and repackage with the OOT still languishing in laserdisc quality. First the deleted scenes and ancient BTS on the blu-ray, now this.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

If Disney was behind this ill conceived bantha poodoo, it bodes ill for getting the OOT.

Do the Dark Horse omnibus volumes retain their original coloring?

Marvel's also publishing the original-colored versions.

Author
Time

If they republish the originals, that would make up for it a tad. (If only they could include the original ads and letters page.) It's still shabby treatment of the book that arguably turned Marvel's fortunes around in the 70's. They sold a ton of the movie adaptation, and it was reprinted so many times, I've lost count.

It's a safe bet Thomas and Chaykin don't benefit from this financially?

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Baronlando said:

Maybe it's a good thing, it certainly shows they are willing to sell absolutely anything that can be sold.

That's a good thing?!

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Marvel Comics: sucking all the life and fun out of their comics since the 1990s.

Who at Marvel do you blame? Editor-in-chief? President? CEO?

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Baronlando said:

Maybe it's a good thing, it certainly shows they are willing to sell absolutely anything that can be sold.

That's a good thing?!

 Sure, if they will sell anything that can yield a few bucks, that would include the OT. 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

bkev said:

Provided this is like The Killing Joke where the original is still easily available in a different edition down the line 

 Yeah that was a great recolour IMHO.

It doesn't always suit the material though. That sample that is posted above does not look good. Recolouring Vader to be all shiny doesn't really work to add glamour, when he's poorly drawn in the first place (The details are all wrong). The original "cheap" and gritty colours work better with the original inks. Also the original features a careful and striking colour compositionwhich is totally gone in the recolouring. All visual contrast is erased. The SE indeed.

btw I much prefer the original version of that Boba cover. The original is waaay more striking and less bland.

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

Number of variants for issue #1 has spiked to FIFTY TWO!

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

darklordoftech said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Marvel Comics: sucking all the life and fun out of their comics since the 1990s.

Who at Marvel do you blame? Editor-in-chief? President? CEO?

The editor-in-chief would be my prime suspect. 

Author
Time

Baronlando said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Baronlando said:

Maybe it's a good thing, it certainly shows they are willing to sell absolutely anything that can be sold.

That's a good thing?!

 Sure, if they will sell anything that can yield a few bucks, that would include the OT. 

Ah, yes, seen in that light, I suppose it can be a good thing.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

If they republish the originals, that would make up for it a tad. (If only they could include the original ads and letters page.) It's still shabby treatment of the book that arguably turned Marvel's fortunes around in the 70's. They sold a ton of the movie adaptation, and it was reprinted so many times, I've lost count.

It's a safe bet Thomas and Chaykin don't benefit from this financially?

 Weren't Chaykin and co trying to do something else so they sabotaged Star Wars, that's why ended up with so much delightful goofy nonsense?

Author
Time

Koryo Songhay said:

SilverWook said:

If they republish the originals, that would make up for it a tad. (If only they could include the original ads and letters page.) It's still shabby treatment of the book that arguably turned Marvel's fortunes around in the 70's. They sold a ton of the movie adaptation, and it was reprinted so many times, I've lost count.

It's a safe bet Thomas and Chaykin don't benefit from this financially?

 Weren't Chaykin and co trying to do something else so they sabotaged Star Wars, that's why ended up with so much delightful goofy nonsense?

 What? Roy Thomas is the one who lobbied Stan Lee to adapt the movie in the first place. And this is after Lucas initially approached Marvel about a Star Wars comic and was turned down.

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Thomas created Jaxxon as a Bugs Bunny homage, not to "sabotage" the comic. (Lucas was a Looney Tunes fan, and even wanted Duck Dogers in the 24 1/2 Century to play in front of the film at one point.) Seriously, like a six foot rabbit would look out of place in the cantina scene?

Where were you in '77?