muddyknees2000 said:
The only real interesting way to change the Dooku character into something meaningful is to have him mean something in the overall story or better yet in Anakin's specific story arc.....it makes Anakin's killing of him a bit awkward........AND then you can show Anakin struggling with the fact that he ENJOYED killing him
You've blown my mind with it. Very strong idea. I think that with the material we've got, one very plausible way to have Dooku be influential on Anakin's arc should be centered on how Anakin killed Dooku, the fact that he enjoyed it, and that Palpatine is the only witness of what happened. Like officially Dooku died in the duel, but only Anakin and the chancellor know the "little secret" that he was killed as an un-armed prisoner.
Good reason to remove or reuse some bad lines too. I think of the sequence like this...
Anakin defeats Dooku, and cuts his hands off. Then the Chancellor orders to kill him and Anakin does it without hesitation at all. Cut to a shot of Palpatine showing some interest or curious face about what happened. Finally, Anakin's face of doubt or strangeness, like he's feeling something he's never felt before.
It might not even be needed to have Palpatine order to kill Dooku at all, that way Anakin's violence would take the Chancellor by surprise and therefore the "impressive" face.
After that, no dialogue, just cut to them escaping.
The following scenes in the Emperor's office during the movie should show how this new "sensation" weighs on Anakin, and how he trusts it to his new confident. One of this scenes features them walking away though the office, and having them backwards is a good chance to reimplant lines from another part in which case I suggest one of two dialogues:
A: "I know there are things of the force they're not telling me" (based on what he felt when he killed dooku
P: "It is only natural, he cut off your arm, you wanted revenge"...
Or:
A: "I shouldn't have done that, it's not the jedi way"
P: "It is only natural..."
A: "I know there are things of the Force they're not telling me"
I think the elliptical way of referring to what happened would help a lot to give depth to the characters as well as it would imply that there have been similar dialogues between Anakin and the Emperor about the subject which haven't been shown in the movie... this meaning that Anakin is getting "obsesed" with the matter.
Another nice instance would be to have the Emperor, later, tell Anakin that he has to kill Padmé, though I don't know how to pull that out with the existing dialogue. All I can think of is "...including your wife is now an enemy of the republic" but that hardly fits in the context of "every single jedi".
I just don't like the line, mainly because of the fact that while Palpatine can lie to the Senate about what happened, he can't ever tell Vader what really happened in that office. Anakin is smart enough to know that the republic is an excuse, he must know it's a coup d'Etat.
A less epic, but more grounded line would feel more natural in the context, or at least it wouldn't show the Emperor lying to Vader as if he was dumb:
Every single Jedi is now our enemy./ enemy of the Sith.
Our enemy, not the Republic, because at this point Vader should clearly know Palpatine doesn't give a f*ck about "the republic". It's a pivotal part of the movie, Vader must show a change of values, from "duty" (the Republic) to "interest" (I, me, mine) and make that clear is the neat difference between a full bad Vader and a "confused" Sith Anakin.