logo Sign In

The Standalone Star Wars Films — Page 8

Author
Time

Wow, I'd forgotten all about the standalone films. They'll help bridge the gaps between episodes.

Author
Time

.Mac. said:

It was just confirmed that first standalone SW film, Rogue One, will be about a band of Rebels stealing the plans of the first Death Star. 

 Kyle Katarn stole the Death Star plans!

Rogue One is redundant. Just play the first mission of DARK FORCES.
The hallmark of a corrupt leader: Being surrounded by yes men.
‘The best visual effects in the world will not compensate for a story told badly.’ - V.E.S.
‘Star Wars is a buffet, enjoy the stuff you want, and leave the rest.’ - SilverWook

Author
Time

Wow. It- blbtbly...they deserve a pizza.

I was just in the big panel with Gareth Edwards....

First bit of news is that the standalone films are officially being titled Anthology films.

They showed a teaser.

It starts in a jungle above a raging river. The camera starts to travel along this canyon and above in the sky you can see a massive planetary mass in the sky. As the camera comes around a bend you see that the mass is in fact the Death Star!

Fade to black as the logo comes up and you can hear frantic chilling radio chatter before the logo glitches out and it all falls dead quiet.

More to come when I get a chance!

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Somebody recorded it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NELx1y8cr1M

Man, that's DARK...I approve!

Author
Time

I couldn't tell from the video--is the Death Star actually in the sky of that planet? Because if so, it looks way, way too big.

Author
Time

That planet could be a very small moon though.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Haarspalter said:

.Mac. said:

It was just confirmed that first standalone SW film, Rogue One, will be about a band of Rebels stealing the plans of the first Death Star. 

 Kyle Katarn stole the Death Star plans!

And seeing as I consider Kyle and his role in the EU as part of my personal canon, that means Rogue One is automatically disqualified from admittance into it.

And I was so looking forward to adding another live-action SW film to my canon. I'll guess I'll just have to wait for the second standalone to come along before that opportunity re-presents itself ... *sigh*

Author
Time

Haarspalter said:

Kyle Katarn stole the Death Star plans!

That is just one of maybe three or four (or more) stories in the EU, uh, sorry. "Legends", about how the plans were stolen.

Author
Time

But who is saying that Kyle Katarn won't be in the film? Maybe he'll be in the film after all...! 

Probably not.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

No, probably not.

As someone who has nothing but contempt for the way the "Legends" continuity (Lord, I hate referring to it that way; the EU was never one single continuity even at the best of times) unfolded, there are still loads of characters from it that I love, all of whom have loads of potential, and who I'd love to see brought into the "canon" continuity. So far, though, it's been a bust; the only EU-borne characters I've seen in the new continuity are the ones Lucas & co. brought into it prior to the sale of Lucasfilm to Disney. Frankly, the complete disregard of those characters is starting to annoy me.

Author
Time

I'm liking the term 'Anthology' to refer to these separate, standalone movies...and it seems this will encompass stories from various different eras which opens lots of possible directions for them to go in.

Here's an article which gives a bit more info. on this whole 'Rogue One' premise -  http://www.aintitcool.com/node/71179

Author
Time

I wonder if they'll continue the movies beyond the three they planned if they're successful? I'd love to see that happen, assuming they're good.

Author
Time

There is so much cool potential for standalone movies I'd imagine that there will be many more in the coming decades after this first batch.  Which would be awesome IMO. 

And the teaser "shot" looked dope, the fighter flying overhead towards the massive death star.. it's all about perspective BTW, if it's really close to the planet then sure it could look that big.  

Author
Time

That's true...most moons wouldn't be orbiting in the same place a space station would.

Author
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

That's true...most moons wouldn't be orbiting in the same place a space station would.

 Yea, check out this artist's rendering of how the moon would look if it orbited at the same distance as the ISS: 

So yeah it's feasible.  Regardless I'm really excited for all of the coming films! 

Author
Time

It'd have to be way closer than than though, which would probably require it to have a good portion of itself within the atmosphere. Assuming they haven't stretched the size of it or Alderaan insanely from previous canon, I don't see how it could possibly be large enough to fill up that much of the view on any planet with enough gravity to support an atmosphere, which this one clearly has. Did they confirm that's the Death Star itself though? It looks really different from the Death Star. To me, the dish looks too big. It'd be interesting if it was some kind of crater left by mining entire moon for materials for the Death Star and the Star Destroyer fleet.

Author
Time

valinkrai said:

It'd have to be way closer than than though, which would probably require it to have a good portion of itself within the atmosphere. Assuming they haven't stretched the size of it or Alderaan insanely from previous canon, I don't see how it could possibly be large enough to fill up that much of the view on any planet with enough gravity to support an atmosphere, which this one clearly has. Did they confirm that's the Death Star itself though? It looks really different from the Death Star. To me, the dish looks too big. It'd be interesting if it was some kind of crater left by mining entire moon for materials for the Death Star and the Star Destroyer fleet.

 I think you're over thinking things, the teaser shot honestly probably won't be part of the actual film first of all, they haven't even started filming yet.  

Secondly, the shot is pretty obviously zoomed in, which would cause the object to seem much bigger.  They wanted to show something cool and give a hit as to what time period the film will be set in, and that's it really.  

Author
Time
 (Edited)

mfastx said:

valinkrai said:

It'd have to be way closer than than though, which would probably require it to have a good portion of itself within the atmosphere. Assuming they haven't stretched the size of it or Alderaan insanely from previous canon, I don't see how it could possibly be large enough to fill up that much of the view on any planet with enough gravity to support an atmosphere, which this one clearly has. Did they confirm that's the Death Star itself though? It looks really different from the Death Star. To me, the dish looks too big. It'd be interesting if it was some kind of crater left by mining entire moon for materials for the Death Star and the Star Destroyer fleet.

 I think you're over thinking things, the teaser shot honestly probably won't be part of the actual film first of all, they haven't even started filming yet.  

Secondly, the shot is pretty obviously zoomed in, which would cause the object to seem much bigger.  They wanted to show something cool and give a hit as to what time period the film will be set in, and that's it really.  

Oh, I definitely am. But I just saw someone else posting about it, and figured I'd pipe in, because when I saw it, it was the first thing that I noticed.