Originally posted by: Master Sifo-DyasOriginally posted by: battlewars
maybe lucas shouldnt have made the prequels if he didnt want to be defined by it. it seems to me he ended up doing the prequels just for the money despite what he has said to the contrary.
I don't think this was primarily about money. In my view today it must have been George Lucas wanting to experiment with his ideas of an entirely digital filmproduction and moving further towards the goal to create a method of filmmaking that enables "the average guy with cool ideas" to just realise his ideas - without being dependant on high budgets, quirky actors and rebellious directors. The only economically viable way to do this and get enough attention drawn on his methods of filmmaking again was utilizing the StarWars franchise.
All he wanted was toying with new technology and pushing the envelope on that as much as possible - to me proof of this can be found in any "making of" on the prequel DVDs. His focus always seems to have been on to be able to be virtually barrier free in the terms of were you want the action to take place, to remove the complexity of the film-making process.
Eventually he also wanted to proove that he can create a StarWars trilogy with him at the helms of every relevant aspect of it's creaton and still be successful. And if it was meant as a "finger" it isn't directed at the fans, but moreso at the people who - from his point of view - caused him grief during the production of the original trilogy. He told the parts of the story he wanted to add and filled up the rest with "roller coaster material" he felt people would enjoy.
just as pointless a reason