
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I don't know Bingo if radical is the right word to say what AOTC needs. I'd rather say "deep" changes, not only in the plot, but in some messages the movie is sending to us.
First of all it needs, like most of the prequels, some visual catch up with the OT (Bob Garcia's giving an excellent example of how to make it with his EPIII edit).
Secondly, plot-dialogue editing.
And mainly, AOTC gives us the fans a subtle yet ironical way to tweak what Lucas proposes with this movie, (on your face, George (?)).
I've been thinking on it for a while, and arrived to the conclussion that, as it is now, the saga is expressing that the fall of the Jedi, and the utter fall of the Republic is a consequence of Anakin getting involved with Padme (that stupid shit of forbidden love, and stuff); breaking the rules of the Jedi order. This is more a stupid set up, how could ever in a "matinée-souled" saga be love a problem? his falling in love just that!. Some writers of EU got it the other way and expressed the tragedy of Vader (and with his tragedy, the galaxy's) was more as a consequence of the Jedi Order misfunction, pressuring Anakin to a point wich exploded. This could be, of course, the other side of the coin. Love's not the problem, but those who pretend to repel it. And what's curious is that what defines if the movie is balancing to one perspective or to the other is the grade of conscience Anakin has about:
What's going on in general in the Republic context
The Jedi's double standards. (what you Bingo, brillantly pointed out)
So, if it's to make this little tough deep change in the movie, well, you could tell the "we're not allowed to love, but we are encouraged to support compassion" scene, is pure gold, isn't it?