logo Sign In

The Philosophy Thread - Where Serious Questions "May" Be Discussed — Page 3

Author
Time

Post Praetorian said:

Possessed said:

Do chickens have personalities?  If so, should we be eating them?

Is not personality synonymous with flavor? 

 Not necessarily.  Everybody always wants the fattest cows, pigs, and chickens for their food, and being more fat would probably make them sluggish, therefor decreasing personality but increasing taste, so by this train of thought personality is inversely proportional to flavor.

Author
Time

Possessed said:

Post Praetorian said:

Possessed said:

Do chickens have personalities?  If so, should we be eating them?

Is not personality synonymous with flavor? 

 Not necessarily.  Everybody always wants the fattest cows, pigs, and chickens for their food, and being more fat would probably make them sluggish, therefor decreasing personality but increasing taste, so by this train of thought personality is inversely proportional to flavor.

 Ah, very good! This is acceptable: personality may yet be equated with flavor, but perhaps now in a negative sense...

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

Where are my serious philosophical questions? Am I not waiting patiently enough? 

I have condescended to adjust the topic heading to clarify several positions whilst confusing a myriad others. It was the least I could do...so, naturally, I did it.

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

I'd like to ask serious philosophical questions, but my absurdism gets in the way.

 Then you are most absurdedly in the right place...ask away and we shall peel the onion together, eh?

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

Possessed said:

Post Praetorian said:

Possessed said:

Do chickens have personalities?  If so, should we be eating them?

Is not personality synonymous with flavor? 

 Not necessarily.  Everybody always wants the fattest cows, pigs, and chickens for their food, and being more fat would probably make them sluggish, therefor decreasing personality but increasing taste, so by this train of thought personality is inversely proportional to flavor.

                         VINCENT
                              (to Jules, who's
                              nursing his coffee)
                         Want a sausage?

                                     JULES
                         Naw, I don't eat pork.

                                     VINCENT
                         Are you Jewish?

                                     JULES
                         I ain't Jewish man, I just don't dig
                         on swine.

                                     VINCENT
                         Why not?

                                     JULES
                         They're filthy animals. I don't eat
                         filthy animals.

                                     VINCENT
                         Sausages taste good. Pork chops taste
                         good.

                                     JULES
                         A sewer rat may taste like pumpkin
                         pie.  I'll never know 'cause even if
                         it did, I wouldn't eat the filthy
                         motherfucker. Pigs sleep and root in
                         shit. That's a filthy animal. I don't
                         wanna eat nothin' that ain't got
                         enough sense to disregard its own
                         feces.

                                     VINCENT
                         How about dogs? Dogs eat their own
                         feces.

                                     JULES
                         I don't eat dog either.

                                     VINCENT
                         Yes, but do you consider a dog to be
                         a filthy animal?

                                     JULES
                         I wouldn't go so far as to call a
                         dog filthy, but they're definitely
                         dirty. But a dog's got personality.
                         And personality goes a long way.

                                     VINCENT
                         So by that rationale, if a pig had a
                         better personality, he's cease to be
                         a filthy animal?

                                     JULES
                         We'd have to be talkin' 'bout one
                         motherfuckin' charmin' pig. It'd
                         have to be the Cary Grant of pigs.

<span>The statement below is true
The statement above is false</span>

Author
Time

I'd like to ask a serious question - why the thread title change?

Author
Time

There may be a good answer for this...but, then again, there "may" not...

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

Davnes007 said:

Without the quotes, people may think that they're only supposed to post here during the month of May.

 My "fear" precisely!

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

"Thank you!"

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

If mankind were on the brink of discovering time travel, would it be better that the knowledge be shared universally or banned outright?

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

Post Praetorian said:

If mankind were on the brink of discovering time travel, would it be better that the knowledge be shared universally or banned outright?

 That would be dependent on what the expected effects of time travel would be. Would it be possible to alter the present, or would the present have already been affected by a past time travel? Or would it simply start a new timeline? Would it be possible for a time traveler to return to the same time he had come from, or would he be stuck in the alternate timeline he had created?

Author
Time

Let us assume, for the sake of laziness, that any changes in the past would alter the present without an alternate timeline.

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

. . . or what if it was never possible to alter history, and whatever you ended up doing made the future turn out the way it always had?

Author
Time

If such might be the case it would seem unnecessary to ban the practice...but then how might one be certain of such a thing?

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time

Post Praetorian said:

Let us assume, for the sake of laziness, that any changes in the past would alter the present without an alternate timeline.

That way lies paradoxical madness. 

Author
Time

...and laziness...

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”

Author
Time
 (Edited)

On Sunday, 2.5 of the greatest minutes ever were broadcast on Irish Televison...

Stephen Fry on God / The Meaning Of Life / RTÉ One

The slightly horrified looks on the interviewer's (Gay Byrne) face make it all the better.

To borrow the title from Oolon Colluphid's 4th book "Well, That About Wraps It Up For God" ;-)

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

Thank you for that...though I am not sure what the interviewer was expecting, I think the rest of us knew what was coming...

I was once…but now I’m not… Further: zyzzogeton

“It wasn’t the flood that destroyed the pantry…”