
- Time
- Post link
QuoteIf they're plagiarized material then Sophia Stewart owns all revenue and income associated with them, and should sue for damages on top of that. She was robbed of credit, and of creative control - assuming that her allegations are true. There is nothing worse than plagiarism, and those responsible deserve to be put in gaol for at least 5 years.
Originally posted by: Count Dushku
What a bunch of bull...
QuoteRubbish. If I "take inspiration" from a book and directly convert that to film (with minor alterations) that is plagiarism. Apparently half an hour of material was cut out of the Matrix to lessen the similarities between it and The Third Eye.
Originally posted by: Windexed
Well, there's a seemingly finer line between plagiarism and 'inspiratation' these days.
Princess Leia: I happen to like nice men.
Han Solo: I'm a nice man.
QuoteFox is another studio! How could it be in a studio's best interest to run a story against a studio? A story that makes a fellow studio the bad guy?
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Can this really be true? I mean you'd think someone would have picked the story up...
Why not Fox, or a Viacom network???
QuoteShe's not getting payment of anything yet, the trial begins later this year. The FBI were the ones to establish a link between the third eye and the terminator. Stewart was only interested in pursuing The Matrix - she hadn't seen the Terminator, however the FBI established a link and that is why the Terminator has been bought into it.
Originally posted by: Starboy
It says she's getting payment for the terminator movies as well, and all three matrix movies. I wonder...why didn't she sue after T2 did so well? And why would Time-Warner continue making the other two movies along the same lines, after a suit was filed in 99?
Quote
Originally posted by: GundarkHunter
This whole thing stinks of a cash grab.
QuoteYour legal system sucks.
Originally posted by: Bossk
Doesn't just about any lawsuit these days? C'mon. A woman sued two teenaged girls in her neighborhood because they left cookies on her doorstep. But since they rang her doorbell at 10:30 at night, they gave her an anxiety attack and she sued. She won. Just medical costs and court fees. No punitive damages. But seriously, though.
Quote
Originally posted by: DanielBQuoteFox is another studio! How could it be in a studio's best interest to run a story against a studio? A story that makes a fellow studio the bad guy?
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Can this really be true? I mean you'd think someone would have picked the story up...
Why not Fox, or a Viacom network???
Wouldn't fox love to see Warner Bros fall?
Princess Leia: I happen to like nice men.
Han Solo: I'm a nice man.
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: Sadly, I believe the prequels are beyond repair.
<span class=“Bold”>JediRandy: They’re certainly beyond any repair you’re capable of making.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: You aren’t one of us.
<span class=“Bold”>Go-Mer-Tonic: I can’t say I find that very disappointing.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>JediRandy: I won’t suck as much as a fan edit.</span>
QuoteThree things will happen if they do that: the public gets the idea that studios are mean and nasty ... two, the public think that Fox are bastards employing dirty anti-branding tactics against WB. And three the friendship between fox and warner is jeopardized.
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
But Fox could point fingers at Warner and say: LOOK HOW EVIL BOTH SETS OF W BROTHERS ARE!...