- Time
- Post link
Please Google “Robert Patrick Testicles” and report back here.
Please Google “Robert Patrick Testicles” and report back here.
Why would I wish to do that?
Why would I wish to do that?
How will we ever know if this
it may be a situation of Robert Patrick never approving or wanting his private parts on screen.
is the case or not?
I don’t know if that is the case or not. I don’t know if doing the search you suggest would tell us whether or not it is the case. Also given what might come up in such a search, I don’t think it is worth it even if it tell if it was the case or not.
Then why tease us with this conjecture?
I was not attempting any sort of teasing.
Um…okay?
*sigh* typo corrected.
I didn’t even see the typo. As usual I just don’t know what you are getting at. You threw out a random hypothetical with no basis and have no interest in backing it up.
Also I was just trying to get you to search for balls because I’m immature, but that’s besides the point (now).
I sure do wonder what colors most seem pairable with dark grey. Oh well no way of knowing and don’t bother asking me about it!
I didn’t even see the typo. As usual I just don’t know what you are getting at. You threw out a random hypothetical with no basis and have no interest in backing it up.
Why is this so difficult to understand? All I am saying is that for all we know, Robert Patrick did give his permission nor want his private parts to be seen in that scene. They have been shown by mistake. If that happened to me I think I’d want the director to cover it up via cgi. What if it were a female’s private parts that were accidentally shown in the scene? Would object to having them covered via cgi, if that is what the actress wanted? And yes, of course it is a hypothetical. I am just saying it is a possibility.
Also I was just trying to get you to search for balls because I’m immature, but that’s besides the point (now).
*sigh*
And all Frink, and the rest of the world every time they read one of your posts I’m sure, is that instead of saying “For all we know”, why don’t you do a google search and find out?
If it is really worth it to you, you do the search.
It’s not. I don’t care either way. You’re the one who said “for all we know” as if it were impossible to find out.
If it is really worth it to you, you do the search.
For all you know, it is worth it to me, but I can’t do the search because my keyboard is missing the “g” key and the oogle search engine shut down two years ago. If that happened to you I think you’d want another forum member to find out via google. What if oogle was purposefully shut down by Robert Patrick to stop people for doing searches about his balls? Would you object to having oogle shut down, if that is what Robert Patrick wanted? And yes, of course this is a hypothetical. I am just saying it is a possibility.
And before you sigh, I am just saying that the above is what it is like to read what of your what-if/hypothetical/possibilities every single time.
But what if James just didn’t want any nudity in his films?
I think Ted Cruz is going to retweet a picture of Robert Patrick’s testicles, so we’re all covered.
I think Ted Cruz is going to retweet a picture of Robert Patrick’s testicles, so we’re all covered.
Lol.
Warbler seems to have an unhealthy obsession with Robert Patrick’s testicles.
It’s not. I don’t care either way. You’re the one who said “for all we know” as if it were impossible to find out.
I didn’t say it was impossible to find, that is not was “for all we know” means.
But what if James just didn’t want any nudity in his films?
possible, but he’d have to do a lot more cgi-ing than he has already done.
But what if James just didn’t want any nudity in his films?
possible, he’d have to do a lot more cgi-ing than he has already done.
If it is really worth it to you, you do the search.
For all you know, it is worth it to me, but I can’t do the search because my keyboard is missing the “g” key and the oogle search engine shut down two years ago.
I think that is rather unlikely. If it were the case, you could just tell me and politely ask me to do the search.
If that happened to you I think you’d want another forum member to find out via google.
I now think it especially unlikely given that you have know typed the letter g above.
What if oogle was purposefully shut down by Robert Patrick to stop people for doing searches about his balls? Would you object to having oogle shut down, if that is what Robert Patrick wanted? And yes, of course this is a hypothetical. I am just saying it is a possibility.
Robert Patrick can not shut google down.
google wouldn’t be the issue, it would be all the sites google is bringing up that host the pics of his private parts.
And before you sigh, I am just saying that the above is what it is like to read what of your what-if/hypothetical/possibilities every single time.
Oh come on, my what-ifs/hypotheticals/possibilities are nowhere near as bad as what you did above.
I think Ted Cruz is going to retweet a picture of Robert Patrick’s testicles, so we’re all covered.
I think Ted Cruz is going to retweet a picture of Robert Patrick’s testicles, so we’re all covered.
Lol.
Warbler seems to have an unhealthy obsession with Robert Patrick’s testicles.
*sigh*
But what if James just didn’t want any nudity in his films?
possible, he’d have to do a lot more cgi-ing than he has already done.