logo Sign In

Star Wars on Super8 (Released) — Page 11

Author
Time

msycamore said:

team_negative1 said:

This is the new version, that should become a standard, especially replacing Puggo's 16mm for film fans of the original.

What are you, George Lucas?

 :)

Donations welcome: paypal.me/poit
bitcoin:13QDjXjt7w7BFiQc4Q7wpRGPtYKYchnm8x
Help get The Original Trilogy preserved!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Of course, big thanks to Poita. For Team Negative1 presents Poita's Star Wars Super 8mm Grindhouse v1.

And thanks to Anctufaalb for distribution.

Team Negative1

Author
Time

Here is a short sample from Reel 1: 

Note that the color has not been corrected,  and the large amount of grain.

=============================================

https://vimeo.com/123359322

Password : OT

Team Negative1

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I'm lovin the high quality rip of the lo-res format :D

May the Schwartz be with you.

Author
Time

team_negative1 said:

Here is a short sample from Reel 1: 

Note that the color has not been corrected,  and the large amount of grain.

=============================================

https://vimeo.com/123359322

Password : OT

Team Negative1

 I love that despite the grain (that doesn't look that bad) it looks very detailed, I love the retro look of smaller prints!

<span>The statement below is true
The statement above is false</span>

Author
Time

We're close to posting our version. Note, that if you adjust the colors, by decreasing the red and adjusting the contrast, you get a very pleasant looking picture for most of the film.

Team Negative1

Author
Time

# aviSynth

cSWS8=ffVideoSource("Reel1RAW.mov")\
.showFrameNumber(scroll=true)

c5of6=merge(\
cSWS8.selectEvery(6, 0,2,3,4,5)\
,cSWS8.selectEvery(6, 1,2,3,4,5))

cSync=\
trim(c5of6, 00291, 28112)\
+trim(c5of6, 28114, 00000)

return cSync
__END__



However, in practice you must take into account the “fuckwit factor”. Just talk to Darth Mallwalker…
-Moth3r

Author
Time

age said:

Wow! This is a very high quality scan.Thanks for sharing.

What wide gamut color profile was used for this?

I am trying to setting the black point on the reel 4,it's possible that the original  footage is a bit dark?

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k4uX2fI4HC5M69aCijV

 I'm actually not all that happy with the quality of the scan, and will be rescanning next month.

Donations welcome: paypal.me/poit
bitcoin:13QDjXjt7w7BFiQc4Q7wpRGPtYKYchnm8x
Help get The Original Trilogy preserved!

Author
Time

poita said:

age said:

Wow! This is a very high quality scan.Thanks for sharing.

What wide gamut color profile was used for this?

I am trying to setting the black point on the reel 4,it's possible that the original  footage is a bit dark?

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k4uX2fI4HC5M69aCijV

 I'm actually not all that happy with the quality of the scan, and will be rescanning next month.

 Why is that? Did you see issues?

<span>The statement below is true
The statement above is false</span>

Author
Time

Ok!! I'm excited because this current scan is already excellent in my opinion and I have don't see any big issues, but I'm sure you can improve it  ;-)

Author
Time

We have no issues with the current scan. The alternate Reel 4, has slightly more contrast, but thats about it.

Any improvement over the current one will be subtle. There's only so much you can get out of 8mm, and this is pushing it as it is for us.

Team Negative1

Author
Time

# aviSynth

cReel2= ffVideoSource("Reel2RAW.mov")\
.showFrameNumber(scroll=true)

c41112= trim(cReel2, 00245, 00482)
c41352= trim(cReel2, 00483, 40737)
c81607= trim(cReel2, 40738, 41869)
c82740= trim(cReel2, 41870,-1)
c82741= merge(\
trim(cReel2, 41871,-1)\
,trim(cReel2, 41872,-1))
c82743= trim(cReel2, 41873, 45806)
#86677

cSync=\
blankClip(cReel2, 41112)+ c41112\
+blankClip(cReel2, 00002)+ c41352+ c81607\
+blankClip(cReel2, 00001)+ c82740+ c82741\
+blankClip(cReel2, 00001)+ c82743

cReel3= ffVideoSource("Reel3RAW.mov")\
#showFrameNumber(scroll=true)

c81607 = trim(cReel3, 00286, 05355)
c86677 = trim(cReel3, 05356, 19362)
c100686= trim(cReel3, 19363, 20256)
c101582= trim(cReel3, 20257, 29049)
c110377= trim(cReel3, 29050, 46703)
c128032= trim(cReel3, 46704, 49493)
c130822= trim(cReel3, 49497, 49499)
#130825

cSync=\
blankClip(cReel2, 41112)+ c41112\
+blankClip(cReel2, 00002)+ c41352+ c81607+ c86677\
+blankClip(cReel3, 00002)+ c100686\
+blankClip(cReel3, 00002)+ c101582\
+blankClip(cReel3, 00002)+ c110377\
+blankClip(cReel3, 00001)+ c128032+ c130822

return cSync
__END__

Clip variable names correspond to GOUT frame numbers,
so for example, c689 would be the title card

However, in practice you must take into account the “fuckwit factor”. Just talk to Darth Mallwalker…
-Moth3r

Author
Time

We hope to have this version appear on myspleen in awhile also:

======================================

This is the new version, that should become a standard, especially replacing Puggo's 16mm for film fans of the original.

We have made a combined version:

======================

1 Cropped and resized to correct 1080p

2 Patched 2 minutes+ that was missing after Reel 2, with LPP scan

3 Added stereo audio (NOT GOUT compatible)

4 Fixed duplicate scene in Reel 3

This new Grindhouse 8mm version is a much more reasonable 8 Gigs,

without much loss in quality.

Things left as an exercise for viewers:

======================

1 Color correction

2 Altering 35mm LPP footage to a lower resolution, and grain

3 Adding Greedo subtitles

4 Adding other soundtracks

5 Fixing a few sound sync issues, due to missing and damaged frames

6 Clean up and dirt scratch removal on the first half of film.

We figure someone will make it work with GOUT, subtitles, etc.

Have fun with it.

Team Negative1

Author
Time

We are in the process of testing dirt and scratch cleanup on the 8mm version, that will NOT be included in this release.

Depending on how this goes and demand, there may be a future update to it.

Team Negative1

Author
Time

Some preliminary shots from the work in progress version, with a first pass at cleanup, and color correction:

TOP - original release (our Grindhouse version)

BOTTOM - new cleaned and corrected version

=========================================

Video comparison:

==========================

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k56TZnN4Df3pt9bclv1

Team Negative1

Author
Time

Why does the "corrected" version have much worse colours than the original?

Author
Time

Wow, the corrected version is awfull !
The non corrected one is better in colour !
Is it a joke or what ?

Author
Time

If Poita & T-1 can make to looks like this it can be really nice to have preservation on Blu-Ray (menu, subtitles, few audio tracks ...)   ;)

Cheers!

Author
Time

Fantomas said:

Wow, the corrected version is awfull !
The non corrected one is better in colour !
Is it a joke or what ?

 Perhaps they mixed up which sample was the top/bottom image. Otherwise, it seems 'it blue itself'.

Author
Time

team_negative1 said:

This is the new version, that should become a standard, especially replacing Puggo's 16mm for film fans of the original.

 Being a big fan of your work, the last thing I want to do is sound defensive.  And I have never, ever claimed the PG was anything but a grungy curiosity with mild research value.  But comparing our respective posted screenshots, I'm a bit confused by your above comment:

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars