logo Sign In

Star Wars coming to Blu Ray (UPDATE: August 30 2011, No! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!) — Page 97

Author
Time

adywan said:

There was a young LAIR name of Ken
Who created a clip in his den
But when they found out it was fake
His pants filled with butt cake

Now he's gone, No he's here back again

 

Honest to God, I just busted out laughing at my desk.  Damn you guys.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

Well, based on what we have heard from LFL, they will just reuse the master they used for the 04 dvds and upscale it to 1080p. It is not going to transferred from actual film elements like most BDs, just reused masters. The same thing happened with the GOUT- they reused the 93 master. So why bother releasing this if it is going to be a half-assed job? But of course it is SW, its going to make millions in its first day, so of course it will be released. But based on discussion on this thread, its going to be a horrible product.

This isn't 100% accurate - the 2004 masters are already at 1080p, so they wouldn't need to upscale them for the Blu-Ray release.  But it's true that everything we've heard leads to the conclusion that they'll just be the same 2004 masters as seen in the HD broadcasts and on the DVDs.

This doesn't mean that this is what will happen, though - maybe they're working on a new master right now.  But based on LFL's history, I doubt it.

Author
Time

ChainsawAsh said:

This doesn't mean that this is what will happen, though - maybe they're working on a new master right now.  But based on LFL's history, I doubt it.

Acutally, I thought based on LFL's history, they would work on a new master. However, since all we have is the trailer, it seems we will have the 2004 versions.

Author
Time

Trailers don't always represent the final colour grading. If they were fixing the colour issues, it's possible, maybe even likely, that the trailer from a year before its release would not feature this. So, personally, I'm not using that trailer as proof of anything, they probably just used whatever footage was onhand.

No doubt, the 2004 master is being used again, as in that particular scan. However, films usually get tweaked visually for BD compared to the same master on DVD--sometimes its just a matter of adding some DNR, sometimes its crushing the blacks a bit more, sometimes they do a better colour pass; depends on the film.

But, based on LFLs history of releasing crappy transfers, being okay with them, and re-releasing them year after year, I'm not betting on any significant new work for the OT transfers, although I do think the hues and levels might be slightly different--not corrected or better, but perhaps slightly different--just because each pressing and broadcast tweaks things ever so slightly. There's no need for DNR, since Lowry basically did that, and Lucas not only personally supervised the transfer but also has seen it screened a number of times since. I have to believe that if he actually noticed Luke had a green lightsaber or all the other issues that he would have pulled the release and issued a correction right there. So, either he's never noticed, or he's never cared, in either case we would be getting the same thing. That's my view, anyway.

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

Trailers don't always represent the final colour grading. If they were fixing the colour issues, it's possible, maybe even likely, that the trailer from a year before its release would not feature this. So, personally, I'm not using that trailer as proof of anything, they probably just used whatever footage was onhand.

I agree. However, that's the only piece of Blu-ray related material that we have. If there is any indication of something, is that nothing has been changed from 2004 based on the trailer. Then again, it's only an indication. Not proof.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

It's not an indication though, as far as I am concerned. It's meaningless. People are just latching onto it because its the only thing we have, but IMO it's a red herring that has been blown out of preportion for lack of any other tangible material (that dearth of material is possibly because there is no such final material available to show yet). But having said that, I do agree with the consensus that the problems won't be fixed, I'm just basing it on different criteria.

Author
Time

I have to give the trailer a small amount of credibility because it somehow has the "treated" TPM footage.

Author
Time

Who was it from LFL who said a while back that they've had the transfers done for years now? I wish I'd kept track of that quote.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

Not only is that trailer horribly put together, but came completely unheralded.

I would not even know about it but by the mention in this thread. TFN never mentioned it in a headline and the official site which is now shit and impossible to navigate it is hard to find unless you find the article on the blu rays and the attached video.

The bad 2004 colors of the SE 2004 OT completely unfixed, blacks still crushed and now phantom menace with even worse colors than the original DVD, pinks might be gone but now the colors are bumped up and overly bright and super saturated nothing like the 35mm release in 1999.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

skyjedi2005 said:

The bad 2004 colors of the SE 2004 OT completely unfixed, blacks still crushed and now phantom menace with even worse colors than the original DVD, pinks might be gone but now the colors are bumped up and overly bright and super saturated nothing like the 35mm release in 1999.

Actually the clips i saw of the new TPM transfer at the Star Wars concert looked very close to how it originally looked in the cinemas and not overly bright or oversaturated and they are the same in the trailer (click to view larger):

The worse thing about all this is that they seem to have taken a lot of care with the TPM transfer, yet seem to not care less about the way the OT looks at all. It's depressing to think that TPM will be the best looking transfer out of all the films and the only film transfer that is close to its original look.

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

Yeah apparently they put some effort into ep. I. It's too bad the '77-'83 trilogy is such an unsurmountable task for LFL. (on a totally unrelated note they are completely rebuilding 198 episodes of THAT '70s SHOW for hd)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Those clips look fine indeed.

But still the Phantom Menace won't be the theatrical.  Won't have the theatrical audio will have those added scenes and a new badly added cgi yoda.

 

I hope its only because of the lowres on the trailer, but the phantom menace scenes look not very well detailed as if there is too much dvnr.

And i still say that it looks over saturated and like video and not filmlike because of theire being little to no grain and overly bright colors, but to each their own.

I did not see Phantom in DLP so perhaps this is how it is supposed to look. Overly soft and colors too bright was a symptom of the prequels if i remember.  So they did the same with the 2004 original trilogy to match which was horrendously done.

They probably only did a 1080 or 2k scan at the most for menace when because the effects were rendered at a fixed resolution.  But the film itself should be scanned ,i mean the o-neg,at least at 4k.

The oot should be scanned in at least 4k, if not 8k like Wizard of Oz. 

All  I know from Zombies article is that the saga is stuck in less than film quality because of Lucas.  DLP and video are garbage and no substitute for the real thing.

But then can get as close as possible if they scan at a high enough resolution and do no dvnr on the blu ray.

I mean the original King Kong Blu ray looks almost as good or better than a release print, if only some scenes look very dupy because of stop motion and its limitations.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Alexrd said:

I have to give the trailer a small amount of credibility because it somehow has the "treated" TPM footage.

 That's a good point, however the "corrected" TPM footage has been seen for years now, case in point it was used in the SW Concert tour of 2010.

My theory? TPM was never "corrected", rather the previous transfers were simply "uncorrected". In other words, this is from the actual DI. It's been there since 1999--this is how it looked in theatres, and it came from a DI. The video transfer from this was messed up from the beginning, possibly because it came from a print or some non-negative source (it certainly looks a bit on the rough side). So, a couple years ago they finally made an HD transfer from the DI itself, seen in SW Concert in 2010 and debuting on home video in the BD in 2011.

This would be consistent with the theory that the trailer guys are just using whatever video material had been floating around for a couple years on-site, and that if the OT was being worked on it probably wouldn't have been in any shape to show by winter 2010. However, this is also consistent with the theory that there is no work being done period, because the only "new" correction--to TPM--was actually already done long ago. Incidentally, while SW Concert featured the authentic TPM colouring, the OT still contained the same basic colouring of the 2004 masters.

But why are we giving a shit about correct colours for the SE in the first place? I hope the SE gets correct colouring the day the OOT gets a correct transfer, so at least some of the SE gushers can understand what it's like to have to watch a crappy version of a film you love when it's very easy to do it right. Maybe if SE lovers and OOT lovers could unite against the LFL quality control they'll wake up and realize what happens when you screw over your supporters and your customers.

Author
Time

Wouldn't they have to be working from a film negative of some kind with Ep. I? (I thought there were no DIs before O Brother Where art thou.)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Every shot except one was treated inside the computer for Ep1. So, even so it wasn't a DI in the traditional sense, it was still a digital finish, they just didn't have the technology to output it at the time. They probably had to do some mild colour timing, but whatever the case, this has existed since at least last year according to reports.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Countdown to Blu-ray

The new Star Wars Insider #126 is slated to come out on May 25th.

It looks like this is the issue where we're going to get the Blu-ray details.

EDIT: LOL. Look at that picture. Love those baggy pants. Who do they have dressed up in that suit, a twelve-year old?

My pants are falling down!

 Jeez!

 

“Anakin had those qualities so rarely seen, exuding an unmistakable confidence and yet still able to touch one’s heart in simply knowing how he was so flawed… wounded.”

Author
Time
 (Edited)

More like the unmaking of an icon! :P

Love him or loathe him, Prowse looked great in the suit. I don't think a skinny fellow would have worked in 1977.

And what idiot during the photo shoot thought tucking the gloves into the sleeves was a good idea?

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

I think that's Hayden in the suit.

 

 

Go figure

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

Wasn't the Insider #125 going to have the Blu-ray preview?

Author
Time

Darth Hade said:

Countdown to Blu-ray

The new Star Wars Insider #126 is slated to come out on May 25th.

It looks like this is the issue where we're going to get the Blu-ray details.

EDIT: LOL. Look at that picture. Love those baggy pants. Who do they have dressed up in that suit, a twelve-year old?

My pants are falling down!

 Jeez!

 

I thought that six year old in the Super Bowl ad was a better Vader than Hayden. ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Alexrd said:

Wasn't the Insider #125 going to have the Blu-ray preview?

It looks like they pushed it back one issue.

SWI

 

 

 

 

“Anakin had those qualities so rarely seen, exuding an unmistakable confidence and yet still able to touch one’s heart in simply knowing how he was so flawed… wounded.”

Author
Time

I'm still hung up on the "no comment" thing re: the original versions. Any thoughts?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

If they are bigging up special features and not mentioning the original versions I imagine that's for a good reason.

If you are trying to get people to buy something you set out a full menu (and only try to hide unpleasant surprises), you only keep pleasant surprises if you are giving something away for free and somehow I just can't see that happening.

Author
Time

I'm just wondering if perhaps there is a planned release in 2012 for the 35th anniversary. Of course they won't say anthing about it cause they want people to buy the box set. Then they will release the original the following year on the hype of the 3d release and anniversary. Maybe I'm just thinking a little to positive.

Author
Time

May the Fourth is approaching. I bet that's when they'll officially release the details.

Let's not forget the wonderful announcement we got 5 years ago on May the Fourth.

You know of the rebellion against the Empire?