logo Sign In

Star Wars coming to Blu Ray (UPDATE: August 30 2011, No! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!) — Page 220

Author
Time

I hate to say it, but, in all seriousness, I think LucasFilm does know its consumer base.  Granted, it's also responsible for creating this consumer base, so it's a vicious circle... but in the home video industry, the goal is to persuade consumers to buy what they've already bought before.  And for a fanbase that's largely as crazy as George, they actually get off on buying the movies repeatedly just to see what batshit insane, completely pointless changes have happened this time!  I mean, I can just imagine the nerds sitting around now, scruitinizing pictures going, "Ooooooh, look at those rocks around R2 now!  That's new!"

So... yeah, basically what we're doing, only happier about it. =P

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

Oh my; those new changes are truly awful. Vader saying "No!"; I wouldn't even expect that of a bad fan edit... Obi-Wan's new call is way too overemphasized. It seems that Frink shouldn't do a version of Episodes IV-VI; these are humorous enough.

It would be truly mind boggling if people defended these changes...

Author
Time
 (Edited)

How many people pre-ordered these sets expecting more Noooooooo! Theatre?

This may work to our advantage.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I really don't care about additional changes because what's two changes or two hundred? And it's an interesting oddity and the unintentional hilarity resulting is awesome.

But I rhetorically ask why?

What magnificent new technology was created in the last seven years that allowed George to add eyelids to Wicket? Did this lack of blinking ewok creating technology in 2004 prevent George from achieving his original vision and finally completing his masterpiece?

It's all pretty fucking pointless. These are old movies, let them be old movies.

And thanks for all the clips and screencaps. I weep for Adywan having to do this. That Krayt Dragon was as horrible today as it was when you posted it months ago.

"Well here's a big bag of rock salt" - Patton Oswalt

Author
Time

adywan said:

That bloody Jabbas door shot is horrendous. They didn't even bother to add any lens distortion to it. It just looks flat. Must have took them a good few hours to create that shot. ;)

dont mention the repeated texture and details on the door ;)

 

-Angel

–>Artwork<–**

Author
Time

If the originals were maintained these sometimes interesting and frequently silly changes wouldn't do any harm.

The tragedy is the loss of the original films.

The SEs are becoming more and more self parody.

Some of these alterations are beyond Frink.

Author
Time

Does this phrase have a place in this conversation?

Princess Leia said (sorta):

The more you tighten your grip screw with the OT, Lucas, the more star systems fans will slip through your fingers. 

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

It's quite telling that the 97 SEs are now seen as acceptable. By 2020 when the movies are released in whatever new format, we'll be praying that George just gives us the 2011 "R2 in the rocks & blinking Wicket" versions.

It's also amazing not only the terrible decisions to make the changes but how poorly they are made, even if some twisted mind thinks it's great to have Vader yell NOOOOO!!! at the end of Jedi, it just sounds horrible, you can tell right away that it wasn't recorded at the same time.

Anyway, the movies need more NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

They should add the NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! to Empire when Luke cuts Vader head in Dagobah.

And in Jedi after Luke says that he feels the conflict in his father and Vaders throws his saber, another perfect scene for more NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Bingowings wrote: The tragedy is the loss of the original films.

http://originaltrilogy.com/Lucasfilm_PR_response.cfm

The negatives of the movies were permanently altered for the creation of the Special Editions

 

 

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions.

Author
Time

Gaffer Tape said:

I hate to say it, but, in all seriousness, I think LucasFilm does know its consumer base.  Granted, it's also responsible for creating this consumer base, so it's a vicious circle... but in the home video industry, the goal is to persuade consumers to buy what they've already bought before.  And for a fanbase that's largely as crazy as George, they actually get off on buying the movies repeatedly just to see what batshit insane, completely pointless changes have happened this time!  I mean, I can just imagine the nerds sitting around now, scruitinizing pictures going, "Ooooooh, look at those rocks around R2 now!  That's new!"

Yeah, you're probably right.  Sure, we here are laughing (and crying) at the changes, but I dare not visit TFN, BR.com or SW.com, because I imagine in more populous places like those, everyone is rebounding off the walls with glee over all the "improvements".  Next they'll be scoffing at us for not appreciating all the great work that went into these disks.  I really don't care to witness that, and am just grateful to be here and that this tiny den of sanity exists.

Our best hope is that some of GL's peers in the movie industry will start openly criticizing what he's doing... then the throngs of sheep might start bending back in the right direction.  Until then, I agree that there is no point in carrying any illusions that the general public will have the slightest appreciation of what is going on.

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time

Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

Our best hope is that some of GL's peers in the movie industry will start openly criticizing what he's doing... then the throngs of sheep might start bending back in the right direction.  Until then, I agree that there is no point in carrying any illusions that the general public will have the slightest appreciation of what is going on.

Spielberg said it best:

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49921

Steven Spielberg: George goes his own way and I respect him for it, but my new philosophy about this is to let sleeping dogs lie.

Quint: That’s great news for film geeks. Anybody who appreciates film, that's like music to their ears.

Steven Spielberg: When people ask me which E.T. they should look at, I always tell them to look at the original 1982 E.T. If you notice, when we did put out E.T. we put out two E.T.s. We put out the digitally enhanced version with the additional scenes and for no extra money, in the same package, we put out the original ‘82 version. I always tell people to go back to the ’82 version.

Quint: Having the option is the big deal for me. Using the Star Wars example, I don’t think there’d be an outcry if we could watch a nice transfer of the original versions. We’d be like, “George can do what he wants and I’ll watch it… but you know maybe the fans would like the option of watching the movie they fell in love with, too.”

Steven Spielberg: Yeah. And I think the other good thing is that they understand when they see a movie and they suddenly see something that could have been done much better today and could have been corrected in the DVD/Blu-Ray transfer, they really appreciate seeing the strings attached.

If somebody put out George Pal’s War of the Worlds and took the strings off the machines I’d be very upset. When that machine crashes in downtown Hollywood, and you see the strings going from taut to slack, that’s the thing that allows me to both understand this movie is scaring the hell out of me and at the same time this movie is a creation of the human race.

That little taut-to-slack moment of those wires on that wingtip makes the original George Pal War of the Worlds work for me. It embraces my fears and it also alleviates them in the same breath.

“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”

Author
Time

adywan said:

And they have added a bloody Dug into jabbas Palace walking down the steps. Definitely forcing the prequels down our throats

 

A Dug? As in fucking Sebulba? 

And after what they did to poor Wicket, those rumors about Jabba being "digitally more expressive" or whatever shit it was could very well be true.

Author
Time

Oh, geez, I'd forgotten about that!  It probably is then.  Sigh...

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

Yeah, you're probably right.  Sure, we here are laughing (and crying) at the changes, but I dare not visit TFN, BR.com or SW.com, because I imagine in more populous places like those, everyone is rebounding off the walls with glee over all the "improvements".  Next they'll be scoffing at us for not appreciating all the great work that went into these disks.  I really don't care to witness that, and am just grateful to be here and that this tiny den of sanity exists.

Actually, over at tfn , i've been surprised by just how many hate these changes, same over at BR.com. A lot are still in denial and think these rips are fake (i've even had emails and PMs with threats from people who are convinced they are fake and that i have something to do with it), and a lot are saying that the changes are the best thing since sliced bread, but there are many many people who are outraged at these changes, people that at one point were all for whatever GL does to the films "because they are his vision".

Oh  and has anyone noticed that a certain person seems to have disappeared off the face of the Earth. I would have thought that with all this talk of the leaked blu-rays and all the details coming out he would be shouting it from the top of the world in every place that even mentions Star Wars.  Very strange indeed.........

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

Wait, I just had a thought. It isn't possible that that awful Obi-Wan call is Matthew Wood vocalizing is it? He said he was going to be in every movie...

Author
Time

Diego said:

adywan said:

And they have added a bloody Dug into jabbas Palace walking down the steps. Definitely forcing the prequels down our throats

 

A Dug? As in fucking Sebulba? 

And after what they did to poor Wicket, those rumors about Jabba being "digitally more expressive" or whatever shit it was could very well be true.

I haven't got ROTJ yet but someone posted a video of it over on facebook. I'm just about to start watching ESB now. Wish me luck......

If you don't hear from me in the next few days i've probably died from excessive projectile vomiting. lol

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

It is Matthew Wood, Obi-Wan's new "Little Richard being tortured" scream has been known since the book Star Wars sounds came out, I'm pretty sure the book says it's Wood and some other dude screaming.

Author
Time

The Aluminum Falcon said:

Wait, I just had a thought. It isn't possible that that awful Obi-Wan call is Matthew Wood vocalizing is it? He said he was going to be in every movie...

The thought had certainly crossed my mind...

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

adywan said:

I haven't got ROTJ yet but someone posted a video of it over on facebook. I'm just about to start watching ESB now. Wish me luck.....

Adywan, "I can't lie to you about your chances but you have my sympathies..."

Author
Time

So I wasn't wrong when I said every day gets a little worse than the day before. The changes are making the 04 sets look appealing. 

Author
Time

Ok, I found my copy of "The Sounds of Star Wars":

 

An interim crow sound was tried before Burtt arrived and recorded Wood and Acord in the parking lot behind the Tech Building. "He sourced from Dave and me yelling" Wood says. "We screamed and screamed. I was trying to model mine off this terrible, cheesy element that I love from a Disneyland ride, The Haunted Mansion: ah, ah, ahooooooah!"

Utimately, Burtt blended the screams -with Acord starting the scream and Wood ending the scream. "It sounds like some kind of weird animal but coming from a human" says Wood