logo Sign In

Star Wars OT & 1997 Special Edition - Various Projects Info (Released) — Page 76

Author
Time

I don't see it now either, after the above comment, it got me thinking about my HDTV settings, well it is a good thing I checked, I was watching Dr. NO on Blu over the weekend and noticed some of the same problems on that Blu as I do my sample, and it was all blue sky scenes, well somehow the settings on my HDTV were messed with, the brightness was cranked all the way up, and so was the damn contrast, once I went through and checked everything, and moved those 2 previously mentioned settings back to where I like them, my issues were gone.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Darth, What's His Name? said:

I don't see that at all. Either on my 24" wide screen monitor or my 58" tv.

I took a few screenshots to illustrate what I think dark_jedi is talking about.  It's especially noticeable in the shot where Luke is running to Beru.  The blue sky nearly disappears with the blockiness, and the blocks are "dancing" like crazy.

http://img339.imageshack.us/g/26606916.png/

 

EDIT: After reading dark_jedi's post about tv settings, maybe my monitor is just wonky.  I'm gonna try them on my 42" plasma. 

“Yes, it speaks of the trinity; casting light at the sun with its wandering eye”

Author
Time

Ok, I don't know if I'm the last tester out or not, but I think it's pretty safe to let these beasts out now, d_j's V3 that is. I didn't notice any sync issues at all on any of the audio tracks, though I'm not as familiar with Jedi as with the other films, but everything sounds correct on that one as well.

Just to have the two 35mm Dolby Stereo mixes for Empire and Jedi synced to the GOUT on its own is a reason to get this set and a great gift to the SW-community. Well done, d_j! And let's not forget hairy_hen's beautiful reconstruction! :)

I also think you struck a quite good balance in the color tweaking of SW, I know this is already too late, but for Empire and Jedi I think you could've boosted the colors a little bit more without hurting the picture, maybe something to consider for your current project.

Unfortunately I must echo what the other reviewers have said about slightly overscanned menus, layer-breaks and chapter points issues, but that is minor things that you may be able to correct before uploading.

Thanks to everyone involved in this set, and to dark_jedi for compiling it all together! 

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Sorry D_J for being somewhat of a spaz during the last 24 hours but crap dude, look at how good your 720p GOUT looks like. Its hard not to be passionate about that.

I got to relax and know that its in good hands. But let me cast my vote one more time for the grain that's there to be left in...it looks so good on my big screen.

Author
Time

FunkyDays said:

dark_jedi said:

This is a sample I whipped up to show you the problems I am having, look at where the sky meets the ground, watch when Luke runs over to Beru, look over Owens shoulder, and when Owen calls Luke over with him and 3PO, this is a very small clip with no audio.

I still have other setting to try but this is my problem.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/sg0l1o

Whoa!  I see it plain as day even on my computer monitor.  In the first shot that shows the entire sky, blocks are dancing around like a "spectrum analyzer".  When Luke is running to Beru it kind of looks like he's in a sandstorm, and when he's looking down speaking to her it looks like plagues of locusts are flying around, but seem to fly up and out of the shot.  Very weird.  I wish I knew what to tell you :-(  Adywan's explanation of why the grain is so heavy in these shots makes perfect sense, but what I'm seeing is definitely not normal film grain, or even "heavy" film grain. I would think that it is possible that the heavy handed noise reduction originally used in the GOUT mastering made the "heavy" grain look blocky and upsampling to a higher resolution only makes it more apparent.  But it also looks like something going crazy during the encoding.

Without looking at the video, it sounds like DCT blocks?

Read here --
http://kvcd.net/sansgrip/avisynth/Noise_Generators-readme.html
http://kvcd.net/sansgrip/avisynth/Blockbuster-readme.html

The Monkey King - Uproar In heaven (1965) Restoration/Preservation Project

Nezha Conquers the Dragon King (1979) BBC 1.66:1 & Theatrical 2.35:1 preservations

Author
Time

Can anybody post some captures of the JSC RotJ? I'd like to know if it looks as awful as the letterbox VHS.

This signature uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:

Author
Time

Wrong thread?

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time

Shouldn't be the wrong thread, I'm referring to the v2 bonuses DJ released to a few people.

Or any other capture will do, I suppose.

This signature uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:

Author
Time
 (Edited)

lol at "BluGOUT."

Note that I think it's a great title, it just struck me as funny.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

lol at "BluGOUT."

Note that I think it's a great title, it just struck me as funny.

It is pretty funny, truth be told, I actually HATE the term GOUT, just sounds stupid to me, like a disease or something, Ricardo and I make fun of this term all the time, but that is what you guys here use, so I guess I will have to as well.

Author
Time

Well, I think that's the whole point of the name GOUT. It is supposed to be funny and it is a name for a diseased release ;-)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Harmy said:

Well, I think that's the whole point of the name GOUT. It is supposed to be funny and it is a name for a diseased release ;-)

Well funny or not, when I talk about this set with Friends and Family I do not use that term at all, never liked it, and never will, but I have to use it here because you guys all do.

Author
Time

Well, I try not to use that term outside of this forum (because a lot of people don't know it) but sometimes it's hard to know what else to call it. I usually call it "the shitty DVD" or "the DVD from the laserdisc master" or of course "the 2006 DVD" but that is all quite long. What do you call it?

Author
Time

Harmy said:

Well, I try not to use that term outside of this forum (because a lot of people don't know it) but sometimes it's hard to know what else to call it. I usually call it "the shitty DVD" or "the DVD from the laserdisc master" or of course "the 2006 DVD" but that is all quite long. What do you call it?

I hear what your saying, that is what I call it to LOL.

Author
Time

dark_jedi: For the V3 DVD set; now that we know it's possible to get a lot closer to the vibrant original film colors without causing overly red skin tones (a big thanks to everyone for working on finding color correction settings that can actually do that), will you be applying the latest color correction methods to the V3 lossless AVI before releasing the V3 DVD set, similar to what LeeThorogood has done with his newest color correction settings (but perhaps with adjustments to what you think is more accurate)?

And if you are, will you also adjust that color correction in some scenes where the general setting might be more problematic?

Thanks for any info. :)

The Star Wars trilogy. There can be only one.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Dunedain said:

dark_jedi: For the V3 DVD set; now that we know it's possible to get a lot closer to the vibrant original film colors without causing overly red skin tones (a big thanks to everyone for working on finding color correction settings that can actually do that), will you be applying the latest color correction methods to the V3 lossless AVI before releasing the V3 DVD set, similar to what LeeThorogood has done with his newest color correction settings (but perhaps with adjustments to what you think is more accurate)?

And if you are, will you also adjust that color correction in some scenes where the general setting might be more problematic?

Thanks for any info. :)

NO I will not, I applaud what Lee is doing but I do not like it at all, Luke does not look like a white guy anymore, it is just way to overboard for my tastes, plus I thought I read(and I could be mistaken) that once he has his settings for SW he is going to apply the same settings to ESB and Jedi? well that isn't going to work, so if he does the other 2 then he will be just guessing, I'll pass.

Once these are shared I don't care what you do with them, you can color correct them all you want, once they are yours, there yours.

I am really sorry in advance because some here think I come off strong, but I am NOT going to re do a whole set because 1 person thinks his color is right and all others are wrong, no way mang!

Once again, once these are released they are yours to do with whatever you want, does not matter to me at all.

*edit - plus remember how long it took for most of us to agree on the Star Wars tweak a while back? color correcting is a pain in the ass, and it never satisfies all, very hard process LOL.

Author
Time

Just got done watching your latest sample...

What can I say but I want it and I need it. :)  You seem to have kept most if not all of the grain and/or detail. People aren't plastic looking. Case in point, Uncle owen's face still has stubble and folds in his skin. Before you couldn't see that.But at the same time Tatooine's sky looks better as well.

And the color is very nice as well. People's complexions and overall color just looks nice to me. Sorry I am not technically trained to judge but to me it looks very good.

This is exciting work D_J. You should be proud of what you've been able to accomplish with George's scraps. very nice.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

dark_jedi: I just meant using the new adjustment methods posted by mother and others that were able to get stronger more accurate colors without the flesh tones going too red, I didn't mean copying LeeThorogood's particular settings as exactly as they are (I also think the flesh tones are too dark, at least in many of the scenes).

And I only mentioned it because you seemed interested in trying to get the colors more accurate using these new methods of fine color adjustment for this HD set, so I thought to might want to apply it to the V3 set also. Since most who have seen these new screen shots using the new color correction methods that have been posted in several threads here have liked them overall, even if there is still some significant fine tuning needed to get them right. :)

The Star Wars trilogy. There can be only one.

Author
Time

Well I thought you were asking about redoing the V3 Lossless avi, and that is a definite NO, but if I, or someone can come up with an avisynth command or commands for better color, than I would definitely consider it on the BLU version, I have Ady's presets for his color correction but it is for After Effects, and I have not actually tried yet, but plan to, but I would prefer, if at all possible, to do it during the rendering of the final lossless avi file, I don't really want to keep running the lossless avi file through other treatments to get this right, hopefully I make sense LOL.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Ah, I see what you mean. Well, I figured if you thought these new color correction methods were so good that they should be in the Blu-Ray set, then they must be good enough for the V3 DVD set also. :)

Since I assume you're not also going to make a separate Blu-Ray without the new color corrections (assuming you think they are that good), meaning the Blu-Ray would only be available with the new color corrections, that you'd want the DVD set to have it also.

And I agree that there were lots of debates about the color correction in the V3 set before, but most agreed that your current V3 settings are very good, while avoiding the problem of red flesh tones. But that was before these new color correction methods were available, some of the new screen shots posted look amazing and most seem to like them better than anything we've seen before. And with your good eye towards avoiding flesh tone problems, I imagine you would choose an excellent set of color correction values that would bring the colors closer to the original film colors than ever before on home video, while avoiding the skin tone problems. Anyhow, just a thought. :)

The Star Wars trilogy. There can be only one.

Author
Time

well whether I see something that looks good or not, the V3 DVD will not get redone, it is finished and it is final, no more DVD work for me, this took far to long as it is, so no revisiting on my end, and you say you have seen "amazing" shots, well I have not, most of what I have seen are way overboard(or hardly any difference at all) as I said, and I think you agreed at least on some scenes, Luke does not even look like a white guy anymore, so for right now, the Blu set will be exactly the same as the V3 DVD, will this please every one, nope, but that is why we are all free to do our own projects right? and again I apologize for sounding harsh but I don't mean to be, but color correcting is a hard thing to do to please everyone, I think some here think Star Wars should look all bright ass colorful like friggin Wizard of Oz when it switches to color LOL, well that is not how I remember it at all.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

All the same, looking forward to downloading the DVD version... when you make it available for everyone to see.

personally im not into Blu-Ray.

You can never go home again, but i guess you can shop there.